Application of genomics/proteomics technologies in the research of biocompatibility of biomaterials

Wuji Cailiao Xuebao/Journal of Inorganic Materials

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 21-28

  Lü, Xiao Ying ^a   Huang, Yan ^a   Yu, Ya Dong ^a   Yang, Ya Min ^a  

^a SOUTHEAST UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Biomaterials; Genomics; High throughput; Molecular biocompatibility; Proteomics; Review

Indexed keywords

CELLULAR LEVELS; EFFECTIVE TOOL; GENOMICS; GENOMICS/PROTEOMICS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT; HUMAN BODIES; INTERACTION MECHANISMS; MOLECULAR BIOCOMPATIBILITIES; MOLECULAR LEVELS; PROTEOMICS; SCIENTIFIC ISSUES;

BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; BIOMATERIALS; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; RESEARCH; REVIEWS;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY;

EID: 84874491618     PISSN: 1000324X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1077.2013.12269     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Hegyeli R J. Limitations of current techniques for assessing biohazards and biocompatibility of new candidate materials-orpl. Abstracts of papers of the American Chemical Society, 1970, 1.
2. Homsy C A, Ansevin KD, Obannon W, et al. Rapid in-vitro screening of polymers for biocompatibility. J. Macromol. Sci. A, 1970, 4(3): 615.
3. 1993: 92.
4. Williams D F. Definitions in biomaterials. Progress in biomedical engineering, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1987: 72.
5. Rickert D, Lendlein A, Peters I, et al. Biocompatibility testing of novel multifunctional polymeric biomaterials for tissue engineering applications in head and neck surgery: an overview. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol., 2006, 263(3): 215-222.
6. Williams D F. On the mechanisms of biocompatibility. Biomaterials, 2008, 29(20): 2941-2953.
7. Lü XY, Bao X, Huang Y, et al. Mechanisms of cytotoxicity of nickel ions based on gene expression profiles. Biomaterials, 2009, 30(2): 141-148.
8. Chou L S, Firth J D, Uitto V J, et al. Substratum surface topog- raphy alters cell shape and regulates fibronectin mRNA level, mRNA stability, secretion and assembly in human fibroblasts. J. Cell Sci., 1995, 108(4): 1563-1573.
9. Chou L S, Firth J D, Nathanson D, et al. Effects of titanium on transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of fibronectin inhuman fibroblasts. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1996, 31(2): 209-217.
10. Chou L S, Firth J D, Uitto V J, et al. Effects of titanium substratum and grooved surface topograhy on metalloproteinase-2 expression in human fibroblasts. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1998, 39(3): 437-445.
11. Ripamonti U, Crooks J, Khoah L, et al. The induction of bone formation by coral-derived calcium carbonate/hydroxyapatite constructs. Biomaterials, 2009, 30(7): 1428-1439.
12. Park S H, Gil E S, Shi H, et al. Relationships between degradability of silk scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials, 2010, 31(24): 6162-6172.
13. Im D D, Kruger E A, Huang W B R, et al. Extracellular-signal- related kinase 1/2 is responsible for inhibition of osteogenesis in three-dimensional cultured MC3T3-E1 cells. Tissue Eng. A, 2010, 16(11): 3485-3494.
14. Brown P O, Botstein D. Exploring the new world of the genome with DNA microarrays. Nat. Genet.(Suppl), 1999, 21(1): 33-37.
15. Peng J, Gygi S P. Proteomics: the move to mixtures. J. Mass Spectrom,. 2001, 36(10): 1083-1091.
16. Yuan Q, Zhao F K. New frontiers in the proteome research: quantitative proteomics. Acta Biochimica Et Biophysica Sinica., 2001, 33(5): 477-482.
17. Mueller P P, May T, Perz A, et al. Control of muscle cell proliferation by ferrous iron. Biomaterials, 2006, 27(10): 2193-2200.
18. Lü X Y, Lu H Q, Zhao L F, et al. Genome-wide pathways analysis of nickel ion-induced differential genes expression in fibroblasts. Biomaterials, 2010, 31(8): 1965-1973.
19. Kasprzak K S, Sunderman F W, Salnikowa K. Nickel carcinogenesis. Mutat. Res.-Fund. Mol. M., 2003, 533(1/2): 67-97.
20. Zhao L F, Hong Y, Yang D Y, et al. The underlying biological mechanisms of biocompatibility differences between bare and TiN-coated NiTi alloys. Biomed. Mater., 2011, 6(2): 025012-1-12.
21. Hong Y, Zhao L F, Yang D Y, et al. Analyses of differentially expressed genes in human cell in response to uncoated and Ti-coated NiTi alloys. The 2011 International Conference on Information Science and Technology (ICIST 2011), Nanjing, 2011: 1377-1381.
22. Yang D Y, Hong Y, Zhao L F, et al. Proteomic analysis of human endothelial cells in response to bare and titanium nitride-coated NiTi alloys. 3rd Chinese-Europe Symposium on Biomaterials in Regenerative Medicine, Nanjing, 2011: 159.
23. Lee H, Ko S H. Microarray analysis of MC3T3-E1 osteoblastic cell response to machined titanium surface and resorbable blast material titanium surface. Bone, 2011, 48(Suppl 2): S111.
24. Sollazzo V, Palmieri A, Pezzetti F, et al. Genetic effect of zirconium oxide coating on osteoblast-like cells. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B, 2008, 84B(2): 550-558.
25. Derhami K, Zheng J, Li L, et al. Proteomic analysis of human skin fibroblasts grown on titanium: novel approach to study molecular biocompatibility. J. Biomed Mater Res., 2001, 56(2): 234-244.
26. Leven R M, Virdi A S, Sumner D R. Patterns of gene expression in rat bone marrow stromal cells cultured on titanium alloy discs of different roughness. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A, 2004, 70A(3): 391-401.
27. Zhao M, An M, Wang Q, et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis of human osteoblast-like MG-63 cells in response to bioinert implant material titanium and polyetheretherketone, J. Proteomics, 2012, 75(12): 3560-3573.
28. Xie J, Baumann M J, McCabe L R. Osteoblasts respond to hydroxyapatite surfaces with immediate changes in gene expression. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 2004, 71A(1): 108-117.
29. Song J H, Kim J H, Park S, et al. Signaling responses of osteoblast cells to hydroxyapatite: the activation of ERK and SOX9. J. Bone Miner. Metab., 2008, 26(2): 138-142.
30. Xu J L, Khor K A, Sui J J, et al. Comparative proteomics profile of osteoblasts cultured on dissimilar hydroxyapatite biomaterials: an iTRAQ-coupled 2-D LC-MS/MS analysis. Proteomics, 2008, 8(20): 4249-4258.
31. Xu J L, Khor K A, Sui J J, et al. Protein expression profiles in osteoblasts in response to differentially shaped hydroxyrapatite nanoparticles. Biomaterials, 2009, 30(29): 5385-5391.
32. 2010.
33. Wang J D, Lü X Y, Li B, et al. Mechanism Study on Osteoinductive Property of Natural Hydroxyapatite to Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell. National Conference on Biomaterials, Chengdu, 2010.
34. Zhang Z W, Lü X Y, Wang J D. Pilot Study of Osteoinduction mechanism of Natural Hydroxyapatite. 9th World Biomaterials Congress, Chengdu, 2012.
35. Carinci F, Piattelli A, Degidi M, et al. Genetic effects of anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss®) on osteoblast-like MG63 cells. Arch. Oral Biol., 2006, 51(2): 154-163.
36. Zhang L L, Hanagata N, Maeda M, et al. Porous hydroxyapatite and biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics promote ectopic osteoblast differentiation from mesenchymal stem cells. Sci. Tech. Adv. Mater., 2009, 10(2): 025003.
37. Khan J A, Pillai B, Das T K, et al. Molecular effects of uptake of gold nanoparticles in HeLa cells. ChemBioChem, 2007, 8(11): 1237-1240.
38. Kawata K, Osawa M, Okabe S. In vitro toxicity of silver nanoparticles at noncytotoxic doses to HepG2 human hepatoma cells. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2009, 43(15): 6046-6051.
39. Kim E, Chu Y C, Han J Y, et al. Proteomic analysis of silver nanoparticle toxicity in rat. Toxicol. Environ. Health. Sci., 2010, 2(4): 251-262.
40. Yang Y M, Qu Y H, LÜ X Y. Global gene expression analysis of the effects of gold nanoparticles on human dermal fibroblasts. J. Biomed Nanotechnol., 2010, 6(3): 234-246.
41. Ma J W, Lü X Y, Huang Y. Genomic analysis of cytotoxicity response to nanosilver in human dermal fibroblasts. J. Biomed Nanotechnol., 2011, 7(2): 263-275.
42. Lv X Y, Qu Y H, Yang Y M, et al. Proteomic analysis of molecular mechanism of interactions between gold nanoparticles and human dermal fibroblasts-fetal. Journal of Functional Materials, 2011, 42(6): 1016-1020.
43. Lü X Y, Huang Y, Ma J W. Mechanism study of cytotoxicity of silver nanoparticles based on biomics methods. Chinese Journal of Dental Materials and Devices, 2010, 19(4): 179-182.
44. Cui D X, Tian F R, Ozkan C S, et al. Effect of single wall carbon nanotubes on human HEK293 cells. Toxicol. Lett., 2005, 155(1): 73-85.
45. Ding L G, Stilwell J, Zhang T T, et al. Molecular characterization of the cytotoxic mechanism of multiwall carbon nanotubes and nano-onions on human skin fibroblast. Nano Lett., 2005, 5(12): 2448-2464.
46. 2 nanotubes on vascular cells. Nano Lett., 2010, 10(1): 143-148.
47. Chew S Y, Mi R, Hoke A, et al. The effect of the alignment of electrospun fibrous scaffolds on Schwann cell maturation. Biomaterials, 2008, 29(6): 653-661.
48. Agudelo-Garcia P A, De Jesus J K, Williams S P, et al. Glioma cell migration on three-dimensional nanofiber scaffolds is regulated by substrate topography and abolished by inhibition of STAT3 signaling. Neoplasia, 2011, 13(9): 831-840.
49. He W, Yong T, Ma Z W, et al. Biodegradable polymer nanofiber mesh to maintain functions of endothelial cells. Tissue Eng., 2006, 12(9): 2457-2466.
50. Yu Y D, Lü X Y. Integrin roles in Aligned Nanofiber influence PC12 Cell Differentiation. 9th World Biomaterials Congress, Chengdu, 2012.
51. Dinnes D L M, Marcal H, Mahler S M, et al. Material surfaces affect the protein expression patterns of human macrophages: a proteomics approach. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A, 2007, 80A(4): 895-908.
52. Rahman M A, Kumar S G, Kim S W, et al. Proteomic analysis for inhibitory effect of chitosan oligosaccharides on 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation. Proteomics, 2008, 8(3): 569-581.
53. Jaworski J, Klapperich C M. Fibroblast remodeling activity at two- and three-dimensional collagen-glycosaminoglycan interfaces. Biomaterials, 2006, 27(23): 4212-4220.
54. Klapperich C M, Bertozzi C R. Global gene expression of cells attached to a tissue engineering scaffold. Biomaterials, 2004, 25(25): 5631-5641.
55. Li G N, Livi L L, Gourd C M, et al. Genomic and morphological changes of neuroblastoma cells in response to three-dimensional matrices. Tissue Eng., 2007, 13(5): 1035-1047.
56. Xue M. Biological evaluation of medical devices-test animal welfare requirements. Chinese Journal of Dental Materials and Devices, 2007, 16(3): 117-124.
57. Johansson H, Lindstedt M, Albrekt A S, et al. A genomic biomarker signature can predict skin sensitizers using a cell-based in vitro alternative to animal tests. BMC Genomics, 2011, 12: 399-1-19.