Consumer behaviour and contraceptive decisions: Resolving a decades-long puzzle

Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 241-244

  Campbell, Martha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;

CONTRACEPTION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FAMILY PLANNING; FAMILY SERVICE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; LONG TERM CARE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; REVIEW; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL EDUCATION; SOCIOECONOMICS;

COMMUNICATION BARRIERS; CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; DEMOGRAPHY; FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 33750347608     PISSN: 14711893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1783/147118906778586705     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Leibenstein HM. Economic Backwardness and Economic Growth. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1957.
2. Becker GS. An economic analysis of fertility. Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries. Princeton, NJ: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1960.
3. Cleland J, Wilson C. Demand theories of the fertility transition: an iconoclastic view. Popul Stud 1987; 41: 5-30.
4. Shelton JD, Bradshaw L, Hussein B, Zubair Z, Drexler T, McKenna MR. Putting unmet need to the test: community-based distribution of family planning in Pakistan. Int Fam Plan Perspect 1999; 25: 191-195.
5. Population Reference Bureau. Women of Our World 2005. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau, 2005.
6. Chacko E. Women's use of contraception in rural India: a village-level study. Health Place 2001; 7: 197-208.
7. Magnani RJ, Hotchkiss DR, Florence CS, Shafer LA. The impact of family planning supply environment on contraceptive intentions and use in Morocco. Stud Fam Plann 1999; 30: 120-132.
8. Bertrand JT, Guerra de Salazar S, Mazariegos L, Salanic V, Rice J, Sow CK. Promoting birthspacing among the Maya-Quiche of Guatemala. Int Fam Plan Perspect 1999; 25: 160-167.
9. Bertrand JT, Seiber E, Escudero G. Contraceptive dynamics in Guatemala: 1978-1998. Int Fam Plan Perspect 2001; 27: 112-136.
10. Farooq GM, Adeokun LA. Impact of rural family planning program in Ishan, Nigeria, 1969-72. Stud Fam Plann 1976; 7: 158-169.
11. Freedman R. Do family planning programs affect fertility preferences? A literature review. Stud Fam Plann 1997; 28: 1-13.
12. D'Agnes T. From Condoms to Cabbages: The Authorized Biography of Mechai Viravaidya. Bangkok, Thailand: The Bangkok Publishing Public Company Ltd, 2001.
13. Potts M. Refugees - even those fleeing from genocide - do not want to start families. People 1980; 7: 28-29.
14. Sheth J. Models of Buyer Behavior. New York, NY: Harper & Row, 1974.
15. Rogers E. Diffusion of Innovations (3rd edn). New York, NY: The Free Press, 1983; 166.
16. Campbell M, Sahin-Hodoglugil NN, Potts M. Barriers to fertility regulation: a review of the literature. Stud Fam Plann 2006; 37: 87-98.
17. Stanback J, Thompson A, Hardee K, Janowitz B. Menstruation requirements: a significant barrier to contraceptive access in developing countries. Stud Fam Plann 1997; 28: 245-250.
18. Lassner KJ, Janowitz B, Rodrigues CM. Sterilization approval and follow-through in Brazil. Stud Fam Plann 1986; 17: 188-198.
19. Tomeczuk B. Summary from a reproductive health survey among Afghan refugees in Pakistan. Unpublished Technical Report, 2000.
20. Grubb GS. Women's perception of the safety of the pill: a survey in eight developing countries. J Biosoc Sci 1987; 19: 313-321.
21. Bhatia S. Contraceptive intentions and subsequent behavior in rural Bangladesh. Stud Fam Plann 1982; 13: 24-31.
22. Phillips JF, Simmons R, Koenig MA, Chakraborty J. Determinants of reproductive chuntie in a traditional society: evidence from Matlab, Bangladesh. Stud Fam Plann 1988; 19: 313-334.
23. Caldwell P, Caldwell J. What does the Matlab fertility experience really show? Stud Fam Plann 1992; 23: 292-310.
24. Haaga JG, Maru RM. The effect of operations research on program changes in Bangladesh. Stud Fam Plann 1991; 27: 76-87.
25. Jain A. Fertility reduction and the quality of family planning services. Stud Fam Plann 1989; 20: 1-16.
26. Freedman R, Berelson B. The record of family planning programs. Stud Fam Plann 1976; 7: 3.
27. Curtis, SL, Westoff CF. Intention to use contraceptives and subsequent contraceptive behavior in Morocco. Stud Fam Plann 1996; 27: 239-250.
28. Central Statistical Authority (Ethiopia) and ORC Macro. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2000. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and Calverton, MD: Central Statistical Authority and ORC Macro, 2001.
29. Sibanda A, Woubalem Z, Hogan DP, Lindstrom DP. The proximate determinants of the decline to below-replacement fertility in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Stud Fam Plann 2003; 34: 1-7.
30. Potts M, Diggory P, Peel J. Abortion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
31. Potts M. Sex and the birth rate: human biology, demographic change, and access to fertility-regulation methods. Popul Dev Rev 1997; 23: 1-39.
32. Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education. Demographic and Health Survey Iran 2000. Tehran, Iran: Ministry of Health. 2002.
33. Noble J, Potts M. The fertility transition in Cuba and the Federal Republic of Korea: the impact of organized family planning. J Biosoc Sci 1996; 28: 211-225.
34. Ravenholt RT. AID's family planning program. Science 1969; 163: 124-127.
35. Freedman R, Berelson B. The record of family planning programs. Stud Fam, Plann 1976; 7: 3-40.
36. Potts M, Campbell M. Reverse gear: Cairo's dependence on a disappearing paradigm. Reprod Contracept 2005; 16: 179-186.
37. Caldwell JC. The globalization of fertility behavior. In: Bulatao R, Casterline J (eds), Global Fertility Transition. New York, NY: Population Council. 2001; 93-115.