Regime interplay in Arctic shipping governance: Explaining regional niche selection

International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 65-85

  Stokke, Olav Schram ^a  

^a FRIDTJOF NANSEN INSTITUTE   (Norway)

Author keywords

Arctic; Governance; Institutional interplay; International regimes; Shipping

Indexed keywords

ARCTIC ENVIRONMENT; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION; SHIPPING; TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE;

ARCTIC;

EID: 84874389546     PISSN: 15679764     EISSN: 15731553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10784-012-9202-1     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Aldridge, H. (1999). Organizations evolving. London: SAGE.
2. AMAP (Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme). (2007). Assessment 2007: Oil and gas activities in the Arctic-effects and potential effects. Oslo. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme.
3. Andresen, S., Skodvin, T., Underdal, A., & Wettestad, J. (2000). Science and politics in international environmental regimes. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
4. Arctic Council. (1998a). Rules of procedure of the Arctic council. http://www. arctic-council. org/index. php/en/about/documents/category/4-founding-documents. Accessed January 2, 2012.
5. Arctic Council. (1998b). Iqualit declaration. http://www. arctic-council. org/index. php/en/about/documents/category/5-declarations. Accessed January 2, 2012.
6. Arctic Council. (2000). Barrow declaration. http://www. arctic-council. org/index. php/en/about/documents/category/5-declarations. Accessed January 2, 2012.
7. Arctic Council. (2009). Tromsø declaration. http://www. arctic-council. org/index. php/en/about/documents/category/5-declarations. Accessed January 2, 2012.
8. Arctic Council. (2011). Nuuk declaration. http://www. arctic-council. org/index. php/en/about/documents/category/5-declarations. Accessed January 2, 2012.
9. Barrett, S. (2003). Environment and statecraft: The strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Bartenstein, K. (2011). The "Arctic exception" in the Law of the Sea Convention: A contribution to safer navigation in the Northwest Passage? Ocean Development and International Law, 42, 22-52.
11. BEATA (Steering Committee for the Barents Euro-Arctic Pan-European Transport Area). (2011). Norwegian Chair BEATA SC 2012-2014. Presentation to the Committee of Senior Officials of the Barents Euro-Arctic Council, Oslo, 7-8 December 2011. http://www. barentsinfo. fi/beac/docs/BEATA_presentation_at_CSO_Oslo_7_December_2011. pdf. Accessed January 2, 2012.
12. Beluga Shipping. (2010). The Arctic shortcut. www. northnorway. org/files/beluga. pdf. Accessed January 2. 2012.
13. Borgerson, S. G. (2008). Arctic meltdown: The economic and security implications of global warming. Foreign Affairs, 87, 63-77.
14. Boyle, A. (2000). Globalism and regionalism in the protection of the marine environment. In D. Vidas (Ed.), Protecting the polar marine environment: Law and policy for pollution prevention (pp. 19-33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Brigham, L. W. (2000). The emerging international polar navigation code: Bi-polar relevance? In D. Vidas (Ed.), Protecting the polar marine environment: Law and policy for pollution prevention (pp. 221-243). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Brigham, L. W. (2011). Globalization and challenges for the maritime Arctic. In D. Vidas & P. J. Schei (Eds.), The world ocean in globalization: Climate change, sustainable fisheries, biodiversity, shipping, regional issues (pp. 305-320). Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
17. Brubaker, R. D. (2001). Straits in the Russian Arctic. Ocean Development and International Law, 32, 263-287.
18. Campe, S. (2009). The secretariat of the international maritime organization: A tanker for tankers. In F. Biermann & B. Siebenhüner (Eds.), Managers of global change: The influence of environmental bureaucracies (pp. 143-168). Cambridge: MIT Press.
19. Chircop, A. (2005). Particularly sensitive sea areas and international navigation rights: Trends, controversies and emerging issues. In I. Davies (Ed.), Issues in international commercial law (pp. 217-243). Aldershot: Ashgate.
20. Chircop, A. (2009). The growth of international shipping in the Arctic: Is a regulatory review timely? International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 24, 355-380.
21. Deggim, H. (2009). International requirements for ships operating in polar waters. London: International Maritime Organization. http://www. imo. org/KnowledgeCentre/PapersAndArticlesByIMOStaff/Documents/International%20requirements%20for%20ships%20operating%20in%20polar%20waters%20-%20H.%20Deggim. pdf. Accessed January 2, 2012.
22. DNV (Det Norske Veritas). (2006). Port reception facilities in the PAME region. Technical Report 2006-1517. Høvik, Norway: Det Norske Veritas.
23. DNV (Det Norske Veritas). (2011). Heavy fuel in the Arctic (phase 1). Technical Report 2011-0053. Høvik, Norway: Det Norske Veritas.
24. de La Fayette, L. A. (2001). The Marine Environmental Protection Committee: The conjunction of the Law of the Sea and international environmental law. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 16, 155-238.
25. Fauchald, O. K. (2011). Regulatory frameworks for maritime transport in the Arctic: Will a polar code contribute to resolve conflicting interests? In J. Grue & R. H. Gabrielsen (Eds.), Marine transport in the high north (pp. 7-91). Oslo: Det norske vitenskaps-akademi.
26. Franck, T. M. (1990). The power of legitimacy among nations. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Haas, P. M. (1989). Do regimes matter? Epistemic communities and Mediterranean pollution control. International Organization, 43, 377-405.
28. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 929-964.
29. Hasanat, W. (2010). Cooperation in the Barents Euro-Arctic Region in the light of international law. Yearbook of Polar Law, 2, 279-309.
30. Holland, G. (2002). The Arctic Ocean-the management of change in the northern seas. Ocean and Coastal Management, 45, 841-851.
31. Hovi, J., Stokke, O. S., & Ulfstein, G. (2005). Introduction and main findings. In O. S. Stokke, J. Hovi, & G. Ulfstein (Eds.), Implementing the climate regime: International compliance (pp. 1-14). London: Earthscan.
32. IMO (International Maritime Organization). (2011a). Outcome of DE 55-Legal opinion on making the Polar Code mandatory: Note by the Secretariat. MEPC 62/11/4/Add. 1, 6 May 2011. London: IMO.
33. IMO (International Maritime Organization). (2011b). Development of a mandatory code for ships operating in polar waters: Report of the working group (Part 2). DE 56/10, 7 July 2011. London: IMO.
34. Jensen, Ø. (2008). Arctic shipping guidelines: Towards a legal regime for navigation safety and environmental protection? Polar Record, 44, 107-114.
35. Kankaanpää, P., & Young, O. R. (2012). The effectiveness of the Arctic Council. Rovaniemi, Finland: Arctic Centre. www. arcticcentre. org. Accessed January 2, 2012.
36. Kao, S.-M., Pearre, N. S., & Firestone, J. (2012). Adoption of the arctic search and rescue agreement: A shift of the Arctic regime toward a hard law basis? Marine Policy, 36, 832-838.
37. Koivurova, T. (2010). Governing Arctic shipping: Finding a role for the Arctic Council. Yearbook of Polar Law, 2, 115-138.
38. Koivurova, T., & Molenaar, E. J. (2009). International governance and regulation of the marine Arctic. Oslo: WWF International Arctic Programme.
39. Lasserre, F. (2011). Arctic shipping routes. International Journal, 64, 793-808.
40. Mitchell, R. B. (1998). Sources of transparency: Information systems in international regimes. International Studies Quarterly, 42, 109-130.
41. Mitchell, R. B., Clark, W. C., & Cash, D. W. (2006). Information and influence. In R. B. Mitchell, W. C. Clark, D. W. Cash, & N. M. Dickson (Eds.), Global environmental assessments: Information and influence (pp. 307-338). Cambridge: MIT Press.
42. Molenaar, E. J. (2007). Port state jurisdiction: Towards comprehensive, mandatory and global coverage. Ocean Development and International Law, 38, 225-257.
43. Molenaar, E. J. (2009). Arctic marine shipping: Overview of the international legal framework, gaps and options. Journal of Transnational Law & Policy, 18, 289-325.
44. Norway (2011). Protokoll fra det 17. møte i den blandede norsk-russiske miljøvernkommisjonen. Oslo: Ministry of the Environment. http://www. regjeringen. no/upload/MD/2011/Norsk_russisk_miljovernssamarbeid/Protokoll_2011_16_kommisjonsmote. pdf. Accessed January 2, 2012.
45. Oberthür, S., & Stokke, O. S. (Eds.). (2011). Institutional interaction and global environmental change: Interplay management and institutional complexes. Cambridge: MIT Press.
46. PAME (Working Group on the Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment). (2009). Arctic marine shipping assessment 2009 report. http://www. pame. is/amsa/amsa-2009-report. Accessed January 2, 2012.
47. PAME (Working Group on the Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment). (2011). PAME work plan 2011-2013. http://www. pame. is. Accessed January 2, 2012.
48. Pharand, D. (2007). The Arctic waters and the Northwest passage: A final revisit. Ocean Development and International Law, 38, 3-69.
49. Pietri, D., Soule, A. B, I. V., Kershner, J., Soles, P., & Sullivan, M. (2008). The Arctic shipping and environmental management agreement: A regime for marine pollution. Coastal Management, 36, 508-523.
50. Raustiala, K., & Victor, D. G. (2004). The regime complex for plant genetic resources. International Organization, 58, 277-309.
51. Richter-Menge, J. A. & Overland, J. E. (eds.), Arctic report card 2010. www. arctic. noaa. gov/reportcard. Accessed January 2 2012.
52. Ringbom, H. (2011). Regulatory layers in shipping. In D. Vidas & P. J. Schei (Eds.), The world ocean in globalization: Climate change, sustainable fisheries, biodiversity, shipping, regional issues (pp. 345-370). Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
53. Skjærseth, J. B., Stokke, O. S., & Wettestad, J. (2006). Soft law, hard law, and effective implementation of international environmental norms. Global Environmental Politics, 6, 104-120.
54. Stenlund, P. (2002). Lessons in regional cooperation from the Arctic. Ocean and Coastal Management, 45, 835-839.
55. Stokke, O. S. (1990). The northern environment: Is cooperation coming? Annals of the American Academy for Political and Social Science, 512, 58-69.
56. Stokke, O. S. (2000). Sub-regional cooperation and protection of the Arctic marine environment: The Barents Sea. In D. Vidas (Ed.), Protecting the polar marine environment: Law and policy for pollution prevention (pp. 124-148). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. Stokke, O. S. (2007). A legal regime for the Arctic? Interplay with the Law of the Sea Convention. Marine Policy, 31, 402-408.
58. Stokke, O. S. (2011a). Interplay management, niche selection, and Arctic environmental governance. In S. Oberthür & O. S. Stokke (Eds.), Institutional interaction and global environmental change: Interplay management and institutional complexes. Cambridge: MIT Press.
59. Stokke, O. S. (2011b). Environmental security in the Arctic: The case for multilevel governance. International Journal, 66, 835-848.
60. Stokke, O. S., & Hønneland, G. (Eds.). (2007). International cooperation and Arctic governance: Regime effectiveness and northern region building. London: Routledge.
61. Stokke, O. S., & Tunander, O. (Eds.). (1994). The Barents region: Cooperation in Arctic Europe. London: Sage.
62. Stokke, O. S., & Vidas, D. (1996). The effectiveness and legitimacy of international regimes. In O. S. Stokke & D. Vidas (Eds.), Governing the Antarctic: The effectiveness and legitimacy of the Antarctic Treaty System (pp. 13-31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63. Tan, A. K.-J. (2006). Vessel-source marine pollution: The law and politics of international regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64. Thürer, D. (2000). Soft law. In R. Bernhardt (Ed.), Encyclopedia of public international law (pp. 452-460). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
65. Underdal, A. (1989). The politics of science in international resource management: A summary. In S. Andresen & W. Østreng (Eds.), International resource management: The role of science and politics (pp. 253-268). London: Belhaven Press.
66. Underdal, A. (2002). One question, two answers. In E. L. Miles, A. Underdal, S. Andresen, J. Wettestad, J. B. Skjærseth, & E. M. Carlin (Eds.), Environmental regime effectiveness: Confronting theory with evidence (pp. 3-45). Cambridge: MIT Press.
67. VanderZwaag, D., Chircop, A., Franckx, E., Kindred, H., & MacInnis, K. et al. (2009). Governance of Arctic marine shipping. Arctic Council. http://arcticportal. org/uploads/bC/JU/bCJUaKAo52XTtHDZ359QNA/5. novAMSA-Governance-of-Arctic-Marine-Shipping-Final-Report-1-Aug. pdf. Accessed January 2, 2012.
68. Verhaag, M. A. (2003). It is not too late: The need for a comprehensive international treaty to protect the Arctic environment. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, 15, 555-579.
69. Wergeland, T. (2011). Historical transit passage through the Northern sea route-August 2010. Mercator, September 2011. www. mercatorinfo. dk. Accessed January 2 2012.
70. Young, O. R. (1985). The age of the Arctic. Foreign Policy, 61, 160-179.
71. Young, O. R. (1991). Political leadership and regime formation: On the development of institutions in international society. International Organization, 45, 281-309.
72. Young, O. R. (1996). Institutional linkages in international society: Polar perspectives. Global Governance, 2, 1-24.
73. Young, O. R. (1997). Rights, rules and resources in international society. In O. R. Young (Ed.), Global governance: Drawing insights from the environmental experience (pp. 1-23). Cambridge: MIT Press.
74. Young, O. R. (1998). Creating regimes: Arctic accords and international governance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
75. Young, O. R. (1999). Regime effectiveness: Taking stock. In O. R. Young (Ed.), The effectiveness of international regimes (pp. 249-279). Cambridge: MIT Press.