The emotional impact of European tobacco-warning images

Tobacco Control

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 123-129

  Munoz M A ^a   Viedma del Jesus M I ^b   Rossello F ^a   Sanchez Nacher N ^a   Montoya, P ^a   Vila, J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITAT DE LES ILLES BALEARS   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; AROUSAL; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EMOTION; EUROPEAN UNION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PACKAGING; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AROUSAL; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EMOTIONS; EUROPEAN UNION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PRODUCT LABELING; PSYCHOMETRICS; SEX FACTORS; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84874199577     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: 14683318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050070     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. The ASPECT Consortium. Tobacco or health in the European Union. Past, present and future. Brussels: European Commission, 2004, http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/health/ph_determinants/life_style/Tobacco/ev_20041022_en.htm
2. Aftab M, Kolben D, Lurie P. International cigarette labelling practices. Tob Control 1999;8:368-72.
3. Borland R, Hill D. Initial impact of the new Australian tobacco health warnings on knowledge and beliefs. Tob Control 1997;6:317-25.
4. Strahan EJ, White K, Fong GT, et al. Enhancing the effectiveness of tobacco package warning labels: a social psychological perspective. Tob Control 2002;11:183-90.
5. Borland R. Tobacco health warnings and smoking-related cognitions and behaviours. Addiction 1997;92:1427-35.
6. Hammond D, Fong GT, McNeill A, et al. Effectiveness of cigarette warning labels in informing smokers about the risks of smoking: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control 2006;15(Suppl 3): 19-25.
7. Donovan RJ, Boulter J, Borland R, et al. Continuous tracking of the Australian National Tobacco Campaign: advertising effects on recall, recognition, cognitions, and behaviour. Tob Control 2003;12(Suppl 2):30-9.
8. Crespo A, Cabestrero R, Grzib G, et al. Visual attention to health warnings in tobacco advertisements: an eye-tracking research between smokers and non-smokers. Studia Psychologica 2007;49:39-51.
9. Moodie C, MacKintosh AM, Hammond D. Adolescents' response to text-only tobacco health warnings: results from the 2008 UK Youth Tobacco Policy Survey. Eur J Public Health 2010;20:463-9.
10. Nascimento BE, Oliveira L, Vieira AS, et al. Avoidance of smoking: the impact of warning labels in Brazil. Tob Control 2008;17:405-9.
11. Commission_of_the_European_Union. Commission decision of 5 September 2003 on the use of colour photographs or other illustrations as health warnings on tobacco packages. In: Communities cote, ed. Brussels: Official Journal n8 L226, 2003:2.
12. Willemsen MC. The new EU cigarette health warnings benefit smokers who want to quit the habit: results from the Dutch continuous survey of smoking habits. Eur J Public Health 2005;15:389-92.
13. Farrelly MC, Davis KC, Duke J, et al. Sustaining 'truth': changes in youth tobacco attitudes and smoking intentions after 3 years of a national antismoking campaign. Health Educ Res 2009;24:42-8.
14. White V, Webster B, Wakefield M. Do graphic health warning labels have an impact on adolescents' smoking-related beliefs and behaviours? Addiction 2008;103:1562-71.
15. Payne S. Gender, women and the tobacco epidemic. GAD 2011;19:344-5.
16. Lang PJ. The emotion probe. Studies of motivation and attention. Am Psychol 1995;50:372-85.
17. Sabatinelli D, Lang PJ, Keil A, et al. Emotional perception: correlation of functional MRI and event-related potentials. Cereb Cortex 2007;17:1085-91.
18. Schupp HT, Cuthbert BN, Bradley MM, et al. Affective picture processing: the late positive potential is modulated by motivational relevance. Psychophysiology 2000;37:257-61.
19. Bradley MM, Hamby S, Low A, et al. Brain potentials in perception: picture complexity and emotional arousal. Psychophysiology 2007;44:364-73.
20. Lang PJ, Simons RF, Balaban M. Attention and Orienting: Sensory and Motivational Processes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997.
21. Hagenaars MA, Stins JF, Roelofs K. Aversive life events enhance human freezing responses. J Exp Psychol Gen. Published Online First: 18 July 2011. doi:10.1037/ a0024211.
22. Cacioppo JT, Priester JR, Berntson GG. Rudimentary determinants of attitudes. II: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. J Pers Soc Psychol 1993;65:5-17.
23. Bradley MM, Codispoti M, Cuthbert BN, et al. Emotion and motivation I: defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. Emotion 2001;1:276-98.
24. [CSEA-NIMH] CftSoEaA. The International Affective Picture System: Digitized Photographs. Gainesville, FL: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida, 1994.
25. Bradley MM, Lang PJ. Fearfulness and affective evaluations of pictures. Motiv Emotion 1999;23:1-13.
26. Bradley MM, Lang PJ. Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 1994;25:49-59.
27. Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN. International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Technical Manual and Affective Ratings. University of Florida. Gainesville: NIMH Center for the Study of Emotional and Attention, 2008.
28. Moltó J, Montañés S, Poy R, et al. Un método para el estudio experimental de las emociones: el International Affective Picture System (IAPS). Adaptación española. RPGA 1999;52:55-87.
29. Vila J, Sánchez M, Ramírez I, et al. El Sistema Internacional de Imágenes Afectivas (IAPS): adaptación española: II. RPGA 2001;54:635-57.
30. Potthoff RF, ed. Statistical Aspects of the Problem of Biases in Psychological Tests. North Carolina, Chapel Hill: EEUU, University of North Carolina, Department of Statistics, 1996.
31. Bradley MM, Codispoti M, Sabatinelli D, et al. Emotion and motivation II: sex differences in picture processing. Emotion 2001;1:300-19.
32. Hammond D, Doxey J, Daniel S, et al. Impact of female-oriented cigarette packaging in the United States. Nicotine Tob Res 2011;13:579-88.
33. Smith DP, Hillman CH, Duley AR. Influences of age on emotional reactivity during picture processing. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2005;60:P49-56.
34. Gruhn D, Scheibe S. Age-related differences in valence and arousal ratings of pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS): do ratings become more extreme with age? Behav Res Methods 2008;40:512-21.
35. Hafez N, Ling PM. How Philip Morris built Marlboro into a global brand for young adults: implications for international tobacco control. Tob Control 2005;14:262-71.
36. Cummings KM, Morley CP, Horan JK, et al. Marketing to America's youth: evidence from corporate documents. Tob Control 2002;11(Suppl 1):i5-17.
37. Hoek J, Wong C, Gendall P, et al. Effects of dissuasive packaging on young adult smokers. Tob Control 2011;20:183-8.
38. Carter BL, Robinson JD, Lam CY, et al. A psychometric evaluation of cigarette stimuli used in a cue reactivity study. Nicotine Tob Res 2006;8:361-9.
39. Muñoz M, Viedma-del-Jesus M, Fernández-Santaella M, et al. Assessment of tobacco craving by means of the affective image visualization paradigm. Motiv Emotion 2010;34:93-103.
40. Wakefield MA, Germain D, Durkin SJ. How does increasingly plainer cigarette packaging influence adult smokers' perceptions about brand image? An experimental study. Tob Control 2008;17:416-21.
41. Freeman B, Chapman S, Rimmer M. The case for the plain packaging of tobacco products. Addiction 2008;103:580-90.