Wind power deployment outcomes: How can we account for the differences?

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1129-1147

  Toke, David ^a   Breukers, Sylvia ^b   Wolsink, Maarten ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Financial support; Landscape; Local ownership; Planning; Resource

Indexed keywords

GEOGRAPHICAL REGIONS; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STRATEGIC PLANNING; VALUE ENGINEERING;

FINANCIAL SUPPORT SYSTEMS; LANDSCAPE PROTECTION; WIND POWER DEPLOYMENT;

WIND POWER;

EID: 33947658617     PISSN: 13640321     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2006.10.021     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. IEA. Off-shore experiences (2005), International Energy Agency, Paris
2. Hall P., and Taylor R. Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Polit Stud 44 (1996) 936-957
3. Thelen K. How institutions evolve: insights from comparative historical analysis. In: Mahoney J.R., and Mahoney D. (Eds). Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 208-240
4. Mahoney J. Path dependency in historical sociology. Theory Soc 29 (2000) 507-548
5. Interview of Gonzalo Saenz de Miera, Iberdola, Spain, 9 December 2004.
6. Interview of Alfonso Cano, APPA (Association of Producers of Renewable Energy, Spain), 9 December 2004.
7. Interview of Enrique Monasterio, EVE (Basque Energy Agency, Spain), 10 December 2004.
8. Interview of Javier Marques, EVE (Basque Energy Agency, Spain), 10 December 2004.
9. Interview of Mrs. Joke Stoop, Waddenvereniging (National Environmental Oganization, Netherlands), 11 November 2005.
10. Interview of Kai Worsaee, Head of Office for Renewable Energies, Ministry of Energy and Environment, Denmark, 22 June 1999.
11. Interview of Mrs. Leinweber, Umweltrat, Germany, 28 April 2004.
12. Interview of Danyel Reiche, University Berlin, Germany, 18 September 2004.
13. Interview of Mathieu Kortenoever, Pawex, The Netherlands, 12 August 2004.
14. Interview of Godfrey Bevan, Department of Trade and Industry, England, 11 November 1999.
15. Interview of Hans Detlef Feddersen, Independent Wind Power Consultant, Germany, 2 September 2004.
16. Interview of Henning Holst, Independent wind power consultant, Germany, 18 July 1999, giving data from Enercon, 15 November 2005.
17. Interview of Frank Musiol, Naturschutz Bund, National Environmental Organization, Germany, 15 April 2004.
18. Interview of Ruud de Bruijne, SenterNovem, The Netherlands, 29 March 2005.
19. Interview of Per Nielsen, Director Energi Mileu Data, Denmark, 10 August 2004.
20. Interview of Mrs. Susanne Agterbosch, Utrecht University of The Netherlands, 10 February 2005.
21. Yin R.K. Case study research: design and methods (1994), Beverly Hills, Sage
22. Thayer R.L., and Freeman C. Public perceptions of a wind energy landscape. Landscape Urban Plan 14 (1987) 379-398
23. Wolsink M. Planning of renewables schemes. Deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation. Energy Policy 2007;35: in press, doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.002.
24. Devine-Wright P. Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy 7 (2005) 125-139
25. Hukkinen J. Institutions in environmental management: constructing mental models and sustainability (1999), Routledge, London/New York
26. Van Wijk A.J.M., and Coelingh J.P. Wind potential in OECD countries (1993), University Utrecht, Utrecht
27. Troen I., and Petersen E. European wind atlas (1988), Risø DK, Roskilde
28. Toke D. Explaining wind power planning outcomes: some findings from a study in England and Wales. Energy Policy 33 (2005) 1527-1539
29. KEMA. Route Naar Een Hoog Implementatietempo: Windenergie op Land [Route towards a high implementation tempo: wind power onshore] (2002), KEMA, Arnhem NL
30. Koeslag J. Vergunningstraject Van Windenergie; Een Onderzoek Naar de Doorlooplijd en de Slagingskans van de Juridische Procedures Voor Het Plaatsen Van Windturbines (2002), CEA, Rotterdam
31. BUND. Windkraft in Nordrhein-Westfalen. Regionalplanerische Steuerungselemente und Argumente (2004), Bund für Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland, Düsseldorf
32. Faulin J., Lera F., Pintor J.M., and García J. The outlook of renewable energy in Navarre: an economic profile. Energy Policy 34 (2006) 2201-2216
33. Dinica V. Sustained diffusion of renewable energy (2003), Twente University Press, Enschede
34. Wolsink M. Dutch wind power policy-stagnating implementation of renewables. Energy Policy 24 (1996) 1079-1088
35. Breukers S., and Wolsink M. Wind energy policies in the Netherlands: Institutional capacity-building for ecological modernisation. Environmental Politics 16 (2007) 92-112
36. Miles N, Odell K. Spatial planning for wind energy: lessons from the Danish case. Master thesis, University Roskilde DK, 2004.
37. Breukers S. Institutional capacity building for wind power, a geographical comparison. PhD. thesis, University of Amsterdam, 2007.
38. Strachan P.A., and Lal D. Wind energy policy, planning and management practice in the UK: hot air or a gathering storm?. Region Stud 38 (2004) 551-571
39. Loring A. Wind development in England, Wales and Denmark-the role of community participation and network stability in project acceptance and planning success. Doctoral thesis, University of Sussex, Falmer, 2004.
40. Walker G. Renewable energy and the public. Land Use Policy 12 (1995) 49-59
41. Söderholm P., Ek K., and Petterson M. Wind power development in Sweden: global policies and local obstacles. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 11 (2007) 365-400
42. Wolsink M. Wind power implementation: The nature of public attitudes: equity and fairness instead of backyard motives. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 11 (2007) 1188-1207
43. Nadai A. "Planning", "siting" and the local acceptance of wind power: some lessons from the French case. Energy Policy 2007;35: in press.
44. Gross C. Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia, The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance. Energy Policy 2007;35: in press, doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.013.
45. In: Pasqualetti M.J., Gipe P., and Righter R.W. (Eds). Wind power in view. Energy Landscapes in a crowded world (2002), Academic Press, San Diego, CA
46. Devlin E. Factors affecting public acceptance of wind turbines in Sweden. Wind Eng 29 (2005) 503-511
47. Lange E., and Hehl-Lange S. Combining a participatory planning approach with a virtual landscape model for the siting of wind turbines. J Environ Plan Manage 48 (2005) 833-852
48. Pasqualetti M.J. Wind power. Obstacles and opportunities. Environment 46 (2004) 23-38
49. Pedersen E., and Persson-Waye K. Perception and annoyance due to wind turbine noise-a dose-response relationship. J Accoust Soc Am 116 (2005) 3460-3470
50. Firestone J., and Kempton W. Public opinion about large offshore wind power: underlying factors. Energy Policy 35 (2007) 1584-1598 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.04.010
51. Lowenthal D. British national identity and the English landscape. Rural History 2 (1991) 205-230
52. Alvarez-Farizo B., and Hanley N. Using conjoint analysis to quantify public preferences over the environmental impacts of wind farms. An example from Spain. Energy Policy 30 (2002) 107-116
53. Van der Horst D. Nimby or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies. Energy Policy 2007;35: in press, doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.012.
54. Toke D. Are green electricity certificates the way forward for renewable energy? An evaluation of the UK's renewables obligation in the context of international comparisons. Environ Plan C 23 (2005) 361-374
55. Breukers S, Wolsink M. Wind power implementation in changing institutional landscapes: An international comparison. Energy Policy 2007;35: in press, doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.004.
56. Szarka J. Wind power, policy learning and paradigm change. Energy Policy 34 (2006) 3041-3048
57. Reijnders L. Imports as a major complication: liberalisation of the green electricity market in the Netherlands. Energy Policy 30 (2002) 723-726
58. Meyer N.I., and Koefoed A.L. Danish energy reform: policy implications for renewables. Energy Policy 31 (2003) 597-607
59. Mitchell C. The England and Wales non-fossil fuel obligation: history and lessons. Ann Rev Energy Environ 25 (2000) 297-310
60. Loiter J.M., and Norberg-Bohm V. Technology policy and renewable energy: public roles in the development of new energy technologies. Energy Policy 27 (1999) 85-97
61. Geels F.W. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems. Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Res Policy 33 (2004) 897-920
62. Olesen G. Large scale implementation of renewable and sustainable energy (1998), Danish Organisation for Renewable Energy, Aarhus
63. Christensen P., and Lund H. Conflicting views of sustainability: the case of wind power and nature conservation in Denmark. Eur Environ 8 (1998) 1-6
64. Andersen P.D. Wind power in Denmark (1998), Ministry of Energy and Environment, Copenhagen
65. Jamison A., Eyerman R., Cramer C., and Læssoe J. The making of the new environmental consciousness. A comparative study of the environmental movements in Sweden, Denmark and the Netherlands (1990), Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh
66. Markovits A., and Gorski P. The German left-red green and beyond (1993), Polity Press, Cambridge
67. Hall T. Nuclear politics (1986), Penguin, Harmondsworth, Middlesex
68. Toke D. Community wind power in Europe and in the UK. Wind Eng 29 (2005) 301-308
69. Pastor X. Society organized in defense of the environment+Spain's ecological movement. Rev Occidente 194-195 (1997) 128-142