A framework for resource recommendations for learners using social bookmarking

Proceedings - 2012 8th International Conference on Computing and Networking Technology (INC, ICCIS and ICMIC), ICCNT 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 71-76

  Sharif, Nauman ^a   Afzal, Muhammad Tanvir ^b   Helic, Denis ^a  

^a GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^b CAPITAL UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

e learning; Knowledge management; Recommender system; social networks; Social web

Indexed keywords

CITATION INDEXES; CLASSROOM LEARNING; COURSE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; E-LEARNING SYSTEMS; E-LEARNING TOOL; EXTERNAL SOURCES; LEARNING RESOURCE; LOCAL CONTEXTS; PARTIAL MATCHES; RESOURCE RECOMMENDATION; SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY; SOCIAL BOOKMARKING; SOCIAL COMMUNITIES; SOCIAL NETWORKS; SOCIAL WEBS; WEB 2.0;

DIGITAL LIBRARIES; E-LEARNING; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS; SEARCH ENGINES; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); TEACHING;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84874177191     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Wrubel, J., White, D., Allen, J. 2009. High Fidelity eLearning : SEI's Virtual Training Environment (VTE), Technical Report, CMU/SEI-2009-TR-005 ESC-TR-2009-005, CERT program. Hanscom AFB, MA 01731-2100, Carnegie Mellon University.
2. Stojanovic, L., Staab, S. Studer, R.2001. eLearning based on the Semantic Web. In: Fowler, W., Hasebrook, J. (eds.) Proc. of WebNet'2001, World Conference of the WWW and Internet. AACE (2001)
3. Lennon, J., Maurer H. Why it is Difficult to Introduce eLearning into Schools and Some New Solutions; J.UCS, Volume 9, Issue 10, 2003.
4. Markellou, P., Mousourouli, I., Spiros, S.,Tsakalidis, A. 2005. Using semantic web mining technologies for personalized e-Iearning experiences. In Proceedings of the web-based education, Grindelwald, Switzerland (pp. 461-826).
5. Maurer, H. & Sapper, M. 2001. E-Learning Has to be Seen as Part of General Knowledge Management. In C. Montgomerie & 1. Viteli (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2001
6. Cheung, K.S., 2006. A Comparison Of WebCT, Blackboard And Moodie For The Teaching And Learning Of Continuing Education Courses, International Conference On ICT In Teaching And Learning, Enhancing Learning Through Technology, pp 219-228.
7. Black board stats: http://www.blackboard.com/AboutBb/Who-We-Are/At-a- glance.aspx, accessed on 20th April, 2012. 76
8. Moodie stats: http://moodle.org/stats, accessed on 20th April, 2012.
9. Downes,S.2005. E-Learning 2.0 ACM eLearn Magazine, 2005 , Publications in Trade Journals
10. Cooze, M., & Barbour, M. K .. 2007. Learning styles: A focus upon e-Iearning practices and pedagogy and their implications for successful instructional design ,Journal of Applied Educational Technology, 4 (1) http://www.eduquery.com/jaet/JAET4-1-Cooze.pdf
11. Beldarrain, Y. 2006. Distance Education Trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration. Distance Education, 27, 139-153.
12. Lightner, S., Bobier, M.I., Willi, C. 2007. Team-based activities to promote engaged learning. College Teaching, Winter 2007, 55(1).
13. Broder, A. 2006. The Next generation Web Search: From Information Retrieval to Information Supply, IEEE talk, Stanford University, November 16, 2006
14. Henze, N. 2005. Personalized Learning Object Readers for the Semantic Web. In: Looi, Proc. of 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, AIED'200S. lOS Press 2005 274-281.
15. Saeed, A.U. Afzal, M.T. Latif, A. and Tochtermann, K. 2010. Disseminating Knowledge through Tags: Recommending Tags for Scientific Resources, volume 3, pp. 25-36, 2010.
16. Milne, D. Witten, I.H. 2008. Learning to link with Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management CIKM'2008.