Team-Based Activities to Promote Engaged Learning

College Teaching

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 5-18

  Lightner, Sharon ^a   Bober, Marcie J ^a   Willi, Caroline ^b  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

collaboration; problem solving; social constructivism; team dynamics

Indexed keywords

EID: 69249196261     PISSN: 87567555     EISSN: 19308299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/CTCH.55.1.5-18     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Accounting Education Change Commission and the American Accounting Association. 1990. Position and issues statements of the Accounting Education Change Commission. Accounting Education Series, vol. 13. Sarasota, FL: Accounting Education Change Commission and the American Accounting Association, (accessed November 12, 2003). http://aaahq.org/AECC/PositionsandIssues/cover.htm
2. Angelo, T. A., and K. P. Cross. 1993. Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Bickford, D. J. 2002. Navigating the white waters of collaborative work in shaping learning environments. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 92:43-52.
4. Bonwell, C. C. 1997. Using active learning as assessment in the postsecondary classroom. Clearing House 71 (2): 73-76.
5. Borich, G. D. 2003. Observation skills for effective teaching. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
6. Boyd, D. T., S. C. Boyd, and W. L. Boyd. 2000. Changes in accounting education: Improving principles content for better understanding. Journal of Education for Business 76 (1): 36-42.
7. Chen, I. 2001. Social constructivism. In An electronic textbook on instructional technology. (accessed October 17, 2003). http://coe.uh.edu/~ichen/ebook/ET-IT/social.htm
8. Cook, E. D., and A. C. Hazelwood. 2002. An active learning strategy for the classroom—"Who Wants to Win … Some Mini Chips Ahoy?" Journal of Accounting Education, 20 (4): 297-306.
9. Davis, B. G. 1993. Tools for teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Dwyer, D. C. 2002. Since computers came to school. Educational Technology 42 (4): 17-18.
11. Frisbie, S. H., and E. J. Mitchell. 2001. An experiment with student-centered learning. Syllabus 15 (2): 30-32.
12. Gay, G., M. Stefanone, M. Grace-Martin, and H. Hembrooke. 2001. The effects of wireless computing in collaborating learning environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 13 (2): 257-76.
13. Johnson, D. W., and R. T. Johnson. 1998. Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. 5th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
14. Johnson, D. W., R. T. Johnson, and E. J. Holubec. 1998. Cooperation in the classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
15. Jonassen, D. H., J. Howland, J. Moore, and R. M. Marra. 2003. Learning to solve problems with technology: A constructivist perspective. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
16. Jones, B. F., G. Valdez, J. Nowakowski, and C. Rasmussen. 1994. Designing learning and technology for educational reform. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
17. Kearsley, G., and B. Shneiderman. 1999. Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning, (accessed October 2, 2002). http://home.sprynet.com/~gkearsley/engage.htm
18. Lancaster, K. A. S., and C. A. Strand. 2001. Using the team-learning model in a managerial accounting class: An experiment in cooperative learning. Issues in Accounting Education 16 (4): 549-67.
19. Levine, L. E. 2002. Using technology to enhance the classroom environment. T.H.E. Journal 29 (6): 16-18.
20. Llewellyn, D. 2002. Inquire within: Implementing inquiry-based science standards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
21. McDonough, J. 2000. Engaged learning. American School and University 72 (9): 60-64.
22. Michaelsen, L. K. 1992. Team learning: A comprehensive approach for harnessing the power of small groups in higher education. In To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development, ed. D. H. Wulff and J. D. Nyquist, 107-22. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
23. Murphy, E. A., and C. J. Hoeppner. 2002. Using technology and library resources in financial accounting courses. Journal of Accounting Education, 20 (4): 331-46.
24. Raymond, J. 2002. Laptop programs: An alternative view. New Curriculum, (accessed October 7, 2002). http://www.newcurriculum.com/2002/ed5-20.htm
25. Sambataro, M. 2000. Just-in-time learning. Computerworld (April), (accessed July 5, 2003). http://www.computerworld.com/news/2002/story/0,11280,44312,00.html
26. Shulman, J. H., R. A. Lotan, J. A. Whitcomb, and L. Darling-Hammond, eds. 1998. Groupwork in diverse classrooms: A casebook for educators. New York: Teachers College Press.
27. Strand, N. C., A. M. Rose, and C. M. Lehmann. 2004. Cooperative learning: Resources from the business disciplines. Journal of Accounting Education 20 (1): 1-28.
28. Sundem, G. L., ed. 1999. The accounting education change commission: Its history and impact. Accounting Education Series, vol. 15. Sarasota, FL: Accounting Education Change Commission and American Accounting Association, http://www.aaahq.org/AECC/history/cover.htm (accessed November 7, 2003).