Percutaneous image-guided implantation of totally implantable venous access ports in the forearm or the chest? A patients' point of view

Supportive Care in Cancer

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 505-510

  Goltz, Jan Peter ^a   Petritsch, Bernhard ^a   Kirchner, Johannes ^b   Hahn, Dietbert ^a   Kickuth, Ralph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^b Allgemeines Krankenhaus Hagen gem GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Central venous access; Interventional radiology; Patients' satisfaction; Totally implantable venous access port; Vascular access port

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BLOOD SAMPLING; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER PATIENT; CATHETER THROMBOSIS; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMFORT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DEVICE INFECTION; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; ESTHETICS; FEAR; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PARENTERAL NUTRITION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; TOTALLY IMPLANTABLE VENOUS ACCESS CHEST PORT; TOTALLY IMPLANTABLE VENOUS ACCESS FOREARM PORT; TREATMENT INDICATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CATHETERIZATION, CENTRAL VENOUS; FEMALE; FOREARM; HUMANS; KARNOFSKY PERFORMANCE STATUS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RADIOLOGY, INTERVENTIONAL; THORAX; VASCULAR ACCESS DEVICES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84874110343     PISSN: 09414355     EISSN: 14337339     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-012-1544-2     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Kock HJ, Pietsch M, Krause U et al (1998) Implantable vascular access systems: experience in 1500 patients with totally implanted central venous port systems. World J Surg 22:12-16
2. Teichgraber UK, Kausche S, Nagel SN et al (2011) Outcome analysis in 3,160 implantations of radiologically guided placements of totally implantable central venous port systems. Eur Radiol 21:1224-1232
3. Goltz JP, Scholl A, Ritter CO et al (2010) Peripherally placed totally implantable venous-access port systems of the forearm: clinical experience in 763 consecutive patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 33(6):1159-1167
4. Sakamoto N, Arai Y, Takeuchi Y et al (2010) Ultrasound-guided radiological placement of central venous port via the subclavian vein: a retrospective analysis of 500 cases at a single institute. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 33(5):989-999
5. Kuriakose P, Colon-Otero G, Paz-Fumagalli R (2002) Risk of deep venous thrombosis associated with chest versus arm central venous subcutaneous port catheters: a 5-year single-institution retrospective study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13:179-184
6. Goltz JP, Schmid JS, Ritter CO et al (2011) Identification of risk factors for catheter-related thrombosis in patients with totally implantable venous access ports in the forearm. J Vasc Access 13(1):79-85
7. Lorch H, Zwaan M, Kagel C et al (2001) Central venous access ports placed by interventional radiologists: experience with 125 consecutive patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 24:180-184
8. Marcy PY, Chamorey E, Amoretti N et al (2008) A comparison between distal and proximal port device insertion in head and neck cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 34:1262-1269
9. Marcy PY, Magne N, Castadot P et al (2005) Radiological and surgical placement of port devices: a 4-year institutional analysis of procedure performance, quality of life and cost in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 92:61-67
10. Maurer MH, Beck A, Hamm B et al (2009) Central venous port catheters: evaluation of patients' satisfaction with implantation under local anesthesia. J Vasc Access 10:27-32
11. Johansson E, Engervall P, Bjorvell H et al (2009) Patients' perceptions of having a central venous catheter or a totally implantable subcutaneous port system - results from a randomised study in acute leukaemia. Support Care Cancer 17:137-143
12. Teichgraber UK, Nagel SN, Kausche S et al (2011) Clinical benefit of power-injectable port systems: a prospective observational study. Eur J Radiol 21(6):1224-1232
13. Lenhart M, Schatzler S, Manke C et al (2010) Radiological placement of peripheral central venous access ports at the forearm. Technical results and long term outcome in 391 patients. Fortschr Röntgenstr 182(1):20-28
14. Plumhans C, Mahnken AH, Ocklenburg C et al (2011) Jugular versus subclavian totally implantable access ports: catheter position, complications and intrainterventional pain perception. Eur J Radiol 79(3):338-342
15. Marcy PY, Figl A, Ianessi A et al (2010) Central and peripheral venous port catheters: evaluation of patients' satisfaction under local anesthesia. J Vasc Access 11:177-178, author reply 178
16. Polak JF, Anderson D, Hagspiel K et al (1998) Peripherally inserted central venous catheters: factors affecting patient satisfaction. Am J Roentgenol 170:1609-1611
17. Nagel SN, Teichgraber UK, Kausche S et al (2011) Satisfaction and quality of life: a survey-based assessment in patients with a totally implantable venous port system. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 21:197-204