Central and peripheral venous port catheters: Evaluation of patients' satisfaction under local anesthesia

Journal of Vascular Access

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 177-178

  Marcy, Pierre Yves ^a   Figl, Andrea ^a   Ianessi, Antoine ^a   Chamorey, Emmanuel ^a  

^a CENTRE ANTOINE LACASSAGNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIDOCAINE;

CANCER PATIENT; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERIZATION; CENTRAL VENOUS PORT CATHETER; CEPHALIC VEIN CUTDOWN; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; DRUG INFUSION; HUMAN; JUGULAR VEIN; LETTER; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PORTAL PHLEBOGRAPHY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; VASCULAR ACCESS; VEIN SURGERY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 78649405736     PISSN: 11297298     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/112972981001100221     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Maurer MH, Beck A, Hamm B, Gebauer B. Central venous port catheters: evaluation of patients' satisfaction with implantation under local anesthesia. J Vasc Access 2009; 10: 27-32.
2. Lilienberg A, Bengtsson M, Starkhammar H. Implantable devices for venous access: nurses' and patients' evaluation of 3 different port systems. J Adv Nurs1994; 19: 21-8.
3. Marcy PY, Magne N, Castadot P, et al. Radiological and surgical placement of port devices: a 4-year institutional analysis of procedure performance, quality of life and cost in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005; 92: 61-7. (Pubitemid 40875079)
4. Marcy PY. Central venous access: techniques and indications in oncology. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 2333-44.
5. Povoski SP. Cephalic vein cutdown approach for long-term indwelling central venous access. Arch Surg 2002; 137: 746-7.