Peripherally placed totally implantable venous-access port systems of the forearm: Clinical experience in 763 consecutive patients

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1159-1167

  Goltz, Jan P ^a   Scholl, Anne ^a   Ritter, Christian O ^a   Wittenberg, Günther ^b   Hahn, Dietbert ^a   Kickuth, Ralph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^b EVANGELISCHES KRANKENHAUS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Arm port; Central venous access; Complications; Interventional radiology; Percutaneous placement

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; CEFTRIAXONE; CEFUROXIME AXETIL; DIMETINDENE; HEPARIN; PENICILLIN DERIVATIVE; PREDNISOLONE SODIUM SUCCINATE; RANITIDINE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CATHETER COMPLICATION; CATHETER INFECTION; CATHETER OCCLUSION; CATHETER REMOVAL; CATHETER THROMBOSIS; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER; CHEMOPROPHYLAXIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; FOREARM; HUMAN; IMPLANTABLE PORT SYSTEM; IMPLANTATION; LOW DRUG DOSE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDIASTINUM MASS; NAUSEA; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SKIN MANIFESTATION; SUBCLAVIAN VEIN; THERAPY EFFECT; UNSPECIFIED SIDE EFFECT; VASCULAR ACCESS; VASCULAR FRAGILITY; VEIN THROMBOSIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOGRAPHY; ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS; CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; CATHETERS, INDWELLING; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FOREARM; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 78649325976     PISSN: 01741551     EISSN: 1432086X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00270-010-9854-6     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. K Jordan T Behlendorf A Surov, et al. 2008 Venous access ports: frequency and management of complications in oncology patients Onkologie 31 404 410 10.1159/000140451 18596390
2. DA Koolen HW van Laarhoven T Wobbes, et al. 2002 Single-centre experience with tunnelled central venous catheters in 150 cancer patients Neth J Med 60 397 401 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2FptlyhtA%3D%3D 12607590
3. F Ng H Mastoroudes E Paul, et al. 2007 A comparison of Hickman line-and Port-a-Cath-associated complications in patients with solid tumours undergoing chemotherapy Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 19 551 556 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2svls1Giuw%3D%3D
4. H Lorch M Zwaan C Kagel, et al. 2001 Central venous access ports placed by interventional radiologists: experience with 125 consecutive patients Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 24 180 184 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzovVGhsQ%3D%3D 10.1007/s002700001721 11443406
5. LJ Bodner JL Nosher KM Patel, et al. 2000 Peripheral venous access ports: outcomes analysis in 109 patients Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 23 187 193 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3osFeiuw%3D%3D 10.1007/s002700010041 10821892
6. HJ Kock M Pietsch U Krause, et al. 1998 Implantable vascular access systems: experience in 1500 patients with totally implanted central venous port systems World J Surg 22 12 16 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7is12jsQ%3D%3D 10.1007/s002689900342 9465755
7. JE Silberzweig D Sacks AS Khorsandi, et al. 2003 Reporting standards for central venous access J Vasc Interv Radiol 14 S443 S452 14514860
8. D Sacks TE McClenny JF Cardella, et al. 2003 Society of Interventional Radiology clinical practice guidelines J Vasc Interv Radiol 14 S199 S202 14514818
9. H Kreis CR Loehberg MP Lux, et al. 2007 Patients' attitudes to totally implantable venous access port systems for gynecological or breast malignancies Eur J Surg Oncol 33 39 43 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s%2Flt1Smtg%3D%3D 17029869
10. PY Marcy N Magne P Castadot, et al. 2005 Radiological and surgical placement of port devices: a 4-year institutional analysis of procedure performance, quality of life and cost in breast cancer patients Breast Cancer Res Treat 92 61 67 10.1007/s10549-005-1711-y 15980992
11. MC Horattas J Trupiano S Hopkins, et al. 2001 Changing concepts in long-term central venous access: catheter selection and cost savings Am J Infect Control 29 32 40 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzgtV2ktg%3D%3D 10.1067/mic.2001.111536 11172316
12. B Gebauer M El-Sheik M Vogt, et al. 2009 Combined ultrasound and fluoroscopy guided port catheter implantation-high success and low complication rate Eur J Radiol 69 517 522 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.10.018 19340958
13. CM Seiler BE Frohlich UJ Dorsam, et al. 2006 Surgical technique for totally implantable access ports (TIAP) needs improvement: a multivariate analysis of 400 patients J Surg Oncol 93 24 29 10.1002/jso.20410 16353193
14. B Gebauer U Teichgraber M Werk, et al. 2007 Periinterventional prophylactic antibiotics in radiological port catheter implantation Rofo 179 804 810 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2srgvFahsQ%3D%3D 17729433
15. A Da Costa G Kirkorian M Cucherat, et al. 1998 Antibiotic prophylaxis for permanent pacemaker implantation: a meta-analysis Circulation 97 1796 1801 1:STN:280:DyaK1c3msVKqtQ%3D%3D 9603534
16. E Bertaglia F Zerbo S Zardo, et al. 2006 Antibiotic prophylaxis with a single dose of cefazolin during pacemaker implantation: incidence of long-term infective complications Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 29 29 33 10.1111/j.1540-8159. 2006.00294.x 16441714
17. DC McGee MK Gould 2003 Preventing complications of central venous catheterization N Engl J Med 348 1123 1133 10.1056/NEJMra011883 12646670
18. BE Cil M Canyigit B Peynircioglu, et al. 2006 Subcutaneous venous port implantation in adult patients: a single center experience Diagn Interv Radiol 12 93 98 16752357
19. S Kurul P Saip T Aydin 2002 Totally implantable venous-access ports: local problems and extravasation injury Lancet Oncol 3 684 692 10.1016/S1470-2045(02)00905-1 12424071
20. S Vescia AK Baumgartner VR Jacobs, et al. 2008 Management of venous port systems in oncology: a review of current evidence Ann Oncol 19 9 15 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c%2FgtVantw%3D%3D 10.1093/annonc/mdm272 17846025
21. JR Gilsdorf K Wilson TF Beals 1989 Bacterial colonization of intravenous catheter materials in vitro and in vivo Surgery 106 37 44 1:STN:280: DyaL1M3pvVKitA%3D%3D 2500724
22. P Samaras S Dold J Braun, et al. 2008 Infectious port complications are more frequent in younger patients with hematologic malignancies than in solid tumor patients Oncology 74 237 244 10.1159/000151393 18716418
23. McNulty NJ, Kiley DP, Silas AM et al (2009) Implantable subcutaneous venous access devices: is port fixation necessary? A review of 534 cases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. doi: 10.1007/s00270-009-9758-5