The Exercising Commuter: Is Commuting a Healthy Way to Be Active?

Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 299-306

  Shephard, Roy J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Air pollution; Cardiovascular risk factors; Cycling; Obesity; Physical activity requirements; Traffic injuries; Urban design; Walking

Indexed keywords

ATHEROSCLEROSIS; BODY MASS; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CONSENSUS; CYCLING; EXERCISE; HUMAN; MENTAL HEALTH; OSTEOPOROSIS; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; SARCOPENIA; URBAN POPULATION; WALKING;

EID: 84874071220     PISSN: 19329520     EISSN: 19329563     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12170-012-0240-6     Document Type: Review

References (73)

1. • Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011; 43: 1334-59. This paper summarizes the latest statement on the type and amount of physical activity needed by the adult population as agreed by a panel of the American College of Sports Medicine.
2. US Department of Health and Human Services PHS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Nutrition and Physical Activity. Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 1996.
3. •• Warburton DE, Charlesworth S, Ivey A, et al. A systematic review of the evidence for Canada's Physical Activity Guidelines for Adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activ. 2010; 7: 3913. Published online. This paper offers an exhaustive summary of the evidence-base for current exercise recommendations in the adult population, as researched by the authors and reviewed by a consensus panel of the Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology.
4. World Health Organization. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
5. de Nazelle A, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Antó JM, et al. Improving health through policies that promote active travel: a review of evidence to support integrated health impact assessment. Environ Int. 2011; 37: 766-77.
6. • Department of Health and Department for Transport. Active travel strategy. London: Department of Health and Department for Transport, 2010. This report includes many helpful graphs comparing exercise commuting among various European countries.
7. Tin Tin S, Woodward A, Thornley S, et al. Cycling and walking to work in New Zealand, 1991-2006: regional and individual differences, and pointers to effective interventions. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009; 6: 64. Published online.
8. Friends of the Earth. Cycling and health. Friends of the Earth Conference Proceedings, London. London: Friends of the Earth; 1990.
9. Morris JN, Hardman E. Walking to health. Sports Med. 1997; 23: 306-32.
10. Ogilvie D, Foster CE, Rothie H, et al. Interventions to promote walking: systematic review. BMJ. 2007; 334: 1204-7.
11. Shephard RJ. Is active commuting the answer to population health? Sports Med. 2008; 38: 751-8.
12. Shephard RJ. Physiology and biochemistry of exercise. New York, NY: Praeger; 1982.
13. Kesaniemi YK, Danforth E, Jensen PJ, et al. Dose-response issues concerning physical activity and health: an evidence-based symposium. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001; 33: S351-8.
14. •• Aoyagi Y, Shephard RJ. Steps per day. The road to seniors health. Sports Med. 2009; 39: 423-38. This paper summarizes pedometer/accelerometer based evidence on the relationship between one potential mode of commuting (walking) and health status. It suggests that differing amounts of such activity are needed to enhance different components of health.
15. Daugbjerg SB, Kahlmeier S, Racioppi F, et al. Promotion of physical activity in the European region: content analysis of 27 national policy documents. J Phys Act Health. 2009; 6: 805-17.
16. Martin BW, Mäder U, Stamm HP, et al. Physical activity and health - what are the recommendations and where do we find the Swiss population? Schweiz Z Sportmed Sport Traumatol. 2009; 57: 37-43.
17. US Department of Health and Human Services PHS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Physical activity guidelines for Americans. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report. http://www. health. gov/paguidelines, 2008.
18. Engbers LH, Hendriksen IJ. Characteristics of a population of commuter cyclists in the Netherlands: perceived barriers and facilitators in the personal, social and physical environment. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010; 7: 89. Published online.
19. World Health Organization. Obesity. Preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1998.
20. Löfgren B, Stenevi-Lundgren S, Dencker M, et al. The mode of school transportation in pre-pubertal children does not influence the accrual of bone mineral or the gain in bone size - two year prospective data from the paediatric osteoporosis preventive (POP) study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010; 11: 25. Published online.
21. Oja P, Bull FC, Fogelholm M, et al. Physical activity recommendations for health: what should Europe do? BMC Publ Health. 2010; 10: 10. Published online.
22. Janssen I, LeBlanc AG. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010; 7: 40. Published online.
23. Mountjoy A, Andersen LB, Armstrong N, et al. International Olympic Committee consensus statement on the health and physical fitness of young people through physical activity and sport. Br J Sports Med. 2011; 45: 839-48.
24. Tremblay MS, LeBlanc AG, Janssen I, et al. Canadian Sedentary Behaviour Guidelines for Children and Youth. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011; 36: 59-64.
25. Coogan PF, White LF, Adler TJ, et al. Prospective study of urban form and physical activity in the Black Women's Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2009; 170: 1105-17.
26. Dogra S, Meisner BA, Ardern CI. Variation in mode of physical activity by ethnicity and time since immigration: a cross-sectional analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010; 7: 75. Published online.
27. Kitchen P, Williams A, Chowhan J. Walking to work in Canada: health benefits, socio-economic characteristics and urban-regional variations. BMC Publ Health. 2011; 11: 212. Published online.
28. Brockman R, Fox KR. Physical activity by stealth? The potential health benefits of a workplace transport plan. Publ Health. 2011; 125: 210-6.
29. Steinbach R, Green J, Datta J, et al. Cycling and the city: a case study of how gendered, ethnic and class identities can shape healthy transport choices. Soc Sci Med. 2011; 72: 1123-30.
30. Wahlgren L, Schantz P. The active commuting route environment scale (ACRES): development and evaluation. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010; 7: 58. Published online.
31. Wahlgren L, Schantz P. Bikeability and methodological issues using the active commuting route environment scale (ACRES) in a metropolitan setting. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011; 11: 6. Published online.
32. Saelens BE, Handy SL. Built environment correlates of walking: a review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008; 40 Suppl 7: S550-6.
33. Owen N, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Sugiyama T, et al. Bicycle use for transport in an Australian and a Belgian city: associations with built-environment attributes. J Urban Health. 2010; 87: 189-98.
34. • MacDonald JM, Stokes RJ, Cohen DA, et al. The effect of light rail transit on body mass index and physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2010; 39: 105-12. This study offers prospective insight into the effects of change in one component of urban design in Charlotte, NC.
35. Ogilvie D, Griffin S, Jones A, et al. Commuting and health in Cambridge: a study of a 'natural experiment' in the provision of new transport infrastructure. BMC Publ Health. 2010; 10: 703. Published online.
36. •• Lusk AC, Mekary RA, Feskanich D, et al. Bicycle riding, walking, and weight gain in premenopausal women. Arch Intern Med. 2010; 170: 1050-6. This report offers an unusually long period of follow-up (16 years) of participants in the US Nurses' Health Study. It shows that individuals who engaged in active commuting gained significantly less weight over the observation period.
37. Arango CM, Parra DC, Eyler A, et al. Walking or bicycling to school and weight status among adolescents from Montería, Colombia. J Phys Act Health. 2011; 8 Suppl 2: S171-7.
38. Landsberg B, Plachta-Danielzik S, Much D, et al. Associations between active commuting to school, fat mass and lifestyle factors in adolescents: the Kiel Obesity Prevention Study (KOPS). Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008; 47: 739-47.
39. Lubans DR, Boreham CA, Kelly P, et al. The relationship between active travel to school and health-related fitness in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011; 8: 5. Published online.
40. Faulkner GE, Buliung RN, Flora PK, et al. Active school transport, physical activity levels and body weight of children and youth: a systematic review. Prev Med. 2009; 48: 3-8.
41. Lee MC, Orenstein MR, Richardson MJ. Systematic review of active commuting to school and childrens physical activity and weight. J Phys Act Health. 2008; 5: 930-49.
42. Madsen KA, Gosliner W, Woodward-Lopez G, et al. Physical activity opportunities associated with fitness and weight status among adolescents in low-Income communities. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009; 163: 1014-21.
43. • Gordon-Larsen P, Boone-Heinonen JE, Sidney S, et al. Active commuting and cardiovascular disease risk: the CARDIA study. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169: 1216-23. This study is cross-sectional in type, but it does look at associations between a wide variety of cardiovascular risk factors and exercise commuting.
44. Cooper AR, Wedderkopp N, Jago R, et al. Longitudinal associations of cycling to school with adolescent fitness. Prev Med. 2008; 47: 324-8.
45. Andersen LB, Lawlor DA, Cooper AR, et al. Physical fitness in relation to school in adolescents: the Danish youth and sports study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009; 19: 406-11.
46. Chillón P, Ortega FB, Ruiz JR, Veidebaum T, et al. Active commuting to school in children and adolescents: an opportunity to increase physical activity and fitness. Scand J Public Health. 2010; 38: 873-9.
47. • Chillón P, Evenson KR, Vaughn A, et al. A systematic review of interventions for promoting active transportation to school. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011; 8: 10. Published online. A detailed review of 14 recent quasi-experimental studies intended to increase the proportion of children engaged in active commuting demonstrates only modest effect sizes.
48. Voss C, Sandercock G. Aerobic fitness and mode of travel to school in English school children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010; 42: 281-7.
49. • Lambiase MJ, Barry HM, Roemmich JN. Effect of a simulated active commute to school on cardiovascular stress reactivity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010; 42: 1609-16. This paper is of some interest because it looks at an aspect of active commuting not commonly considered - the reduction of stress.
50. Yang L, Sahlqvist S, McMinn A, et al. Interventions to promote cycling: systematic review. BMJ. 2010; 341: c5293.
51. Sloman L, Cavill N, Cope A, et al. Analysis and synthesis of evidence on the effects of investment in six cycling demonstration towns. London: Department for Transport; 2009.
52. Hemmingsson E, Udden J, Neovius M, et al. Increased physical activity in abdominally obese women through support for changed commuting habits: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Obes. 2009; 33: 645-52.
53. Henriksson G, Hagman O, Andréasson H. Environmentally reformed travel habits during the 2006 congestion charge trial in Stockholm - a qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011; 8: 3202-15.
54. Bos I, Jacobs L, Nawrot TS, et al. No exercise-induced increase in serum BDNF after cycling near a major traffic road. Neurosci Lett. 2011; 500: 129-32.
55. • Jacobs L, Nawrot TS, de Geus B, et al. Subclinical responses in healthy cyclists briefly exposed to traffic-related air pollution: an intervention study. Environ Health. 2010; 9: 64. Published online. Increased exposure to air pollutants is one negative consequence of cycling to work, but this study suggests that the effects upon the airways are not very serious.
56. de Hartog JJ, Boogaard H, Nijland H, et al. Do the health benefits of cycling outweigh the risks? Environ Health Perspect. 2010; 118: 1109-16.
57. • Rojas-Rueda D, de Nazelle A, Tainio M, et al. The health risks and benefits of cycling in urban environments compared with car use: health impact assessment study. BMJ. 2011; 343: d4521. Published online. This study from Barcelona theoretically compares increased deaths from traffic accidents and greater exposure to air pollutants with the enhanced prognosis resulting from the prevention of cardiovascular disease.
58. Buliung RN, Mitra R, Faulkner G. Active school transportation in the Greater Toronto Area, Canada: an exploration of trends in space and time. Prev Med. 2009; 48: 507-12.
59. Davison KK, Werder JL, Lawson CT. Children's active commuting to school: current knowledge and future directions. Prev Chronic Dis. 2008; 5(3): A100. Published online.
60. van der Ploeg HP, Merom D, Corpuz G, et al. Trends in Australian children traveling to school 1971-2003: burning petrol or carbohydrates? Prev Med. 2008; 46: 60-2.
61. Panter JR, Jones AP, van Sluijs EM. Environmental determinants of active travel in youth: a review and framework for future research. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008; 5: 34. Published online.
62. Yeung J, Wearing S, Hills AP. Child transport practices and perceived barriers in active commuting to school. Transp Res Part A. 2008; 42: 895-900.
63. Wen LM, Fry D, Rissel C, et al. Factors associated with children being driven to school: implications for walk to school programs. Health Educ Res. 2008; 23: 325-34.
64. Page AS, Cooper AR, Griew P, et al. Independent mobility, perceptions of the built environment and children's participation in play, active travel and structured exercise and sport: the PEACH Project. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010; 7: 17. Published online.
65. Voorhees CC, Ashwood JS, Evenson KR, et al. Neighborhood design and perceptions: relationship with active commuting. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010; 42: 1253-60.
66. McDonald NC. Critical factors for active transportation to school among low-income and minority students. Evidence from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 34: 341-4.
67. Brophy S, Cooksey R, Lyons RA, et al. Parental factors associated with walking to school and participation in organized activities at age 5: analysis of the Millennium Cohort Study. BMC Publ Health. 2011; 11: 14. Published online.
68. van Dyck D, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Cardon G, et al. Criterion distances and correlates of active transportation to school in Belgian older adolescents. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010; 7: 87. Published online.
69. Robertson-Wilson JE, Leatherdale ST, Wong SL. Social-ecological correlates of active commuting to school among high school students. J Adolesc Health. 2008; 42: 486-95.
70. Faulkner GE, Richichi V, Buliung RN, et al. What's "quickest and easiest?": parental decision making about school trip mode. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010; 7: 62. Published online.
71. Cooper AR, Andersen BL, Wedderkopp N, et al. Physical activity levels of children who walk, cycle, or are driven to school. Am J Prev Med. 2005; 29: 179-84.
72. Sirard JR, Alhassan S, Spencer TR, et al. Changes in physical activity from walking to school. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2008; 40: 324-6.
73. Mendoza A, Watson K, Baranowski T, et al. The walking school bus and children's physical activity: a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2011; 128: e537-44.