Environmentally reformed travel habits during the 2006 congestion charge trial in Stockholm-A qualitative study

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Volumn 8, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 3202-3215

  Henriksson, Greger ^a   Hagman, Olle ^b   Andréasson, Håkan ^b  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Congestion charge; Everyday life; Habits; Policy innovation; Sustainable travel; Transportation; Travel demand management

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEMALE; HABIT; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; POLICY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; TRAFFIC; TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT; TRAVEL;

EID: 80052174749     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16604601     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph8083202     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Santos, G. London congestion charging. In Brooking-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs; Brookings Institution Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2008; pp. 177-234.
2. Siemiatycki, M. The International diffusion of radical transportation policy: The case of congestion charging. Plann. Theor. Pract. 2004, 5, 510-514.
3. Hagman, O.; Andréasson, H. Vägvisare mot en hållbar stad? En intervjustudie i tre bostadsområden i samband med Stockholmsförsöket 2005-2006. Huvudrapport för Vägverket, Projektnummer 1958; Science and Technology Studies, University of Gothenburg: Gothenburg, Sweden, 2006 (in Swedish).
4. Henriksson, G. Stockholmarnas Resvanor-Mellan Trängselskatt och Klimatdebatt (Travel habits of Stockholmers-Congestion charging and climate debate). Ph.D. Thesis, Lund University: Lund, Sweden, 2008 (in Swedish).
5. Franklin, J.P.; Eliasson, J.; Karlström, A. Traveller responses to Stockholm congestion pricing trial: Who changed, where did they go, and what did it cost them? In Travel Demand Management and Road user Pricing: Success, Failure and Feasibility; Saleh, W., Sammer, G., Eds.; Ashgate: Burlington, VT, USA, 2009.
6. Facts and Results from the Stockholm Trial-Final version-December 2006. Miljöavgiftskansliet/Congestion Charge Secretariat: City of Stockholm, Sweden, 2006; Available online: http://www.stockholmsforsoket.se/upload/Sammanfattningar/English/Final Report_The Stockholm Trial.pdf (accessed on 30 July 2011).
7. Winslott-Hiselius, L.; Brundell-Freij, K.; Vagland, Å.; Byström, C. The development of public attitude towards the Stockholm congestion trial. Transp. Res. PT A 2009, 43, 269-282.
8. Kottenhoff, K.; Brundell-Freij, K. The role of public transport for feasability and acceptability of congestion charging-The case of Stockholm. Transp. Res. PT A 2009, 43, 297-305.
9. Henriksson, G. What did the trial mean for stockholmers. In Congestion Taxes in City Traffic: Lessons Learnt from the Stockholm Trial; Gullberg, A., Isaksson, K., Eds.; Nordic Academic Press: Lund, Sweden, 2009.
10. Fox, M. Transport planning and the human activity approach. J. Transport Geogr. 1995, 3, 105-116.
11. Sammer, G. Non-negligible side effects of traffic demand management. In Travel Demand Management and Road User Pricing: Success, Failure and Feasability; Saleh, W., Sammer, G., Eds.; Ashgate: Farnham, UK, 2009.
12. Maxwell, S. Negotiating car use in everyday life. In Car Cultures; Miller, D., Ed.; Berg: Oxford, UK, 2001.
13. Miller, D. Driven societies. In Car Cultures; Miller, D., Ed.; Berg: Oxford, UK, 2001.
14. Sheller, M. Automotive emotions: Feeling the car. Theor. Cult. Soc. 2004, 21, 221-242.
15. Axhausen, K.W.; Urry, J.; Larsen, J. The network society and the networked traveller. In Travel Demand Management and Road User Pricing: Success, Failure and Feasability; Saleh, W., Sammer, G., Eds.; Ashgate: Farnham, UK, 2009.
16. Hannam, K.; Sheller, M.; Urry, J. Editorial: Mobilities, immobilities and moorings. Mobilities 2006, 1, 1-22.
17. Godskesen, M. Rutiner og Brud i Hverdagens Transport. Et Tekniksociologisk Studie af Børnefamiliers Transport (Transport in Everyday Life: Routines and Changes). Ph.D. Thesis, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2002 (in Danish).
18. Eliasson, J. Expected and unexpected in the Stockholm Trial. The views of a transport researcher. In Congestion Taxes in City Traffic: Lessons Learnt from the Stockholm Trial; Gullberg, A., Isaksson, K., Eds.; Nordic Academic Press: Lund, Sweden, 2009.
19. Latour, B. Aramis, or the Love of Technology; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1996.
20. Law, J. Technology and heterogeneous engineering: The case of Portuguese expansion. In The Social Construction of Technological Systems; Bijker, W., Hughes, T.P., Pinch, T., Eds.; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1987.
21. Gustavsson, H.-Å. Kunskapen om och attityder till Stockholmsförsöket. Försöket med miljöavgifter/trängselskatt och utbyggd kollektivtrafik. Slutrapport. Resultat från intervjuer med boende i Stockholms, Stockholms, Sweden, 2 maj-23 maj 2006; Available online: http://www.stockholmsforsoket.se (accessed on 25 July 2011).
22. Eliasson, J.; Hultkrantz, L.; Smidfelt Rosqvist, L. Introduction. Transp. Res. PT A 2009, 43, 237-239.