Single-row vs. double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Clinical and 3 Tesla MR arthrography results

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 14, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Tudisco, Cosimo ^a   Bisicchia, Salvatore ^a   Savarese, Eugenio ^a   Fiori, Roberto ^a   Bartolucci, Dario A ^a   Masala, Salvatore ^a   Simonetti, Giovanni ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Arthroscopic repair; Clinical result; MR arthrography; Rotator cuff tear; Shoulder

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROGRAPHY; ARTHROSCOPY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONSTANT-MURLEY SCALE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ARTHROGRAPHY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPERATION DURATION; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; ROTATOR CUFF INJURY; SIMPLE SHOULDER TEST; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

AGED; ARTHROGRAPHY; ARTHROSCOPY; BIOMECHANICS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RECURRENCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROTATOR CUFF; TENDON INJURIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84874053055     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-43     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Cuff integrity after arthroscopic versus open rotator cuff repair: a prospective study. Bishop J, Klepps S, Lo IK, Bird J, Gladstone JN, Flatow EL, J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006 15 290 299 10.1016/j.jse.2005.09.017 16679227
2. Early outcome of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a matched comparison with mini-open rotator cuff repair. Kang L, Henn RF, Tashjian RZ, Green A, Arthroscopy 2007 23 573 582 e1-2 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.01.011 17560471 (Pubitemid 46873897)
3. Systematic review of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and mini-open rotator cuff repair. Nho SJ, Shindle MK, Sherman SL, Freedman KB, Lyman S, MacGil-livray JD, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007 89 Suppl 3 127 136 17908878 (Pubitemid 47556796)
4. Prospective randomised comparison of arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair of the supraspinatus tendon. Kasten P, Keil C, Grieser T, Raiss P, Streich N, Loew M, Int Orthop 2011 35 1663 1670 10.1007/s00264-011- 1262-2 21533643
5. Ropiak RR, Zmistowski BM, Ciccotti MC, Rynning R, Williams GR Jr, Fenlin JM Jr, Postoperative Pain after Open versus Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Scottsdale, AZ: ASES 2010 closed meeting 2010
6. Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: double-row compared with single-row fixation. Ma CB, Comerford L, Wilson J, Puttlitz CM, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006 88 403 410 10.2106/JBJS.D.02887 16452754 (Pubitemid 43185144)
7. The effect of double-row fixation on initial repair strength in rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study. Meier SW, Meier JD, Arthroscopy 2006 22 493 497
8. Comparison between single-row and double-row rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study. Milano G, Grasso A, Zarelli D, Deriu L, Cillo M, Fabbriciani C, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008 16 75 80 10.1007/s00167-007-0382-0 17684730
9. Outcomes of single-row and double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. Saridakis P, Jones G, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010 92 732 742 10.2106/JBJS.I.01295 20194334
10. A biomechanical comparison of single and double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Smith CD, Alexander S, Hill AM, Huijsmans PE, Bull AM, Amis AA, De Beer JF, Wallace AL, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006 88 2425 2431 10.2106/JBJS.E.00697 17079400 (Pubitemid 44713830)
11. Rotator cuff repair. A biomechanical comparison of three techniques. Waltrip RL, Zheng N, Dugas JR, Andrews JR, Am J Sports Med 2003 31 493 497 12860534 (Pubitemid 36875378)
12. Rotator cuff tears: the effect of the reconstruction method on three-dimensional repair site area. Apreleva M, Ozbaydar M, Fitzgibbons PG, Warner JJ, Arthroscopy 2002 18 519 526 10.1053/jars.2002.32930 11987064 (Pubitemid 36114564)
13. Evaluation of residual rotator cuff defects after in vivo single- versus double-row rotator cuff repairs. Brady PC, Arrigoni P, Burkhart SS, Arthroscopy 2006 22 1070 1075 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.05.007 17027404 (Pubitemid 44485391)
14. Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair. Mazzocca AD, Millett PJ, Guanche CA, Santangelo SA, Arciero RA, Am J Sports Med 2005 33 1861 1868 10.1177/0363546505279575 16210578 (Pubitemid 41720586)
15. Single-row modified mason-allen versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical and surface area comparison. Nelson CO, Sileo MJ, Grossman MG, Serra-Hsu F, Arthroscopy 2008 24 941 948 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.03. 011 18657744
16. Part I: Footprint contact characteristics for a transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique. Park MC, ElAttrache NS, Tibone JE, Ahmad CS, Jun BJ, Lee TQ, J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007 16 461 468 10.1016/j.jse.2006.09.010 17321161 (Pubitemid 47081400)
17. Contact area, contact pressure, and pressure patterns of the tendon-bone interface after rotator cuff repair. Tuoheti Y, Itoi E, Yamamoto N, Seki N, Abe H, Minagawa H, Okada K, Shimada Y, Am J Sports Med 2005 33 1869 1874 10.1177/0363546505278256 16157853 (Pubitemid 41720587)
18. Tendon-bone interface motion in transosseous suture and suture anchor rotator cuff repair techniques. Ahmad CS, Stewart AM, Izquierdo R, Bigliani LU, Am J Sports Med 2005 33 1667 1671 10.1177/0363546505278252 16093532 (Pubitemid 41546740)
19. Tendon-to-bone pressure distributions at a repaired rotator cuff footprint using transosseous suture and suture anchor fixation techniques. Park MC, Cadet ER, Levine WN, Bigliani LU, Ahmad CS, Am J Sports Med 2005 33 1154 1159 10.1177/0363546504273053 16000662 (Pubitemid 41045187)
20. Can a double row anchorage technique improve tendon healing in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? A prospective, nonrandomized, comparative study of double-row and single-row anchorage techniques with computed tomographic arthrography tendon healing assessment. Charousset C, Grimberg J, Duranthon LD, Bellaiche L, Petrover D, Am J Sports Med 2007 35 1247 1253 10.1177/0363546507301661 17452513 (Pubitemid 47084205)
21. The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears. Galatz LM, Ball CM, Teefey SA, Middleton WD, Yamaguchi K, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004 86 219 224 14960664 (Pubitemid 38141554)
22. The outcome and structural integrity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with use of the double-row suture anchor technique. Lafosse L, Brozska R, Toussaint B, Gobezie R, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007 89 1533 1541 10.2106/JBJS.F.00305 17606793 (Pubitemid 47041531)
23. Comparative analysis of single-row versus double-row repair of rotator cuff tears. Pennington WT, Gibbons DJ, Bartz BA, Dodd M, Daun J, Klinger J, Popovich M, Butler B, Arthroscopy 2010 26 1419 1426 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.03.013 20875720
24. A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing arthroscopic single- and double-row rotator cuff repair: magnetic resonance imaging and early clinical evaluation. Burks RT, Crim J, Brown N, Fink B, Greis PE, Am J Sports Med 2009 37 674 682 10.1177/0363546508328115 19204365
25. Equivalent clinical results of arthroscopic single-row and double-row suture anchor repair for rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled trial. Franceschi F, Ruzzini L, Longo UG, Martina FM, Zobel BB, Maffulli N, Denaro V, Am J Sports Med 2007 35 1254 1260 10.1177/0363546507302218 17554104 (Pubitemid 47084206)
26. Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized clinical study. Grasso A, Milano G, Salvatore M, Falcone G, Deriu L, Fabbriciani C, Arthroscopy 2009 25 4 12 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.09.018 19111212
27. Comparison of the clinical outcomes of single- and double-row repairs in rotator cuff tears. Park JY, Lhee SH, Choi JH, Park HK, Yu JW, Seo JB, Am J Sports Med 2008 36 1310 1316 10.1177/0363546508315039 18413680 (Pubitemid 352000014)
28. Fast high-spatial-resolution MRI of the ankle with parallel imaging using GRAPPA at 3 T. Bauer JS, Banerjee S, Henning TD, Krug R, Majumdar S, Link TM, AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007 189 240 245 10.2214/AJR.07.2066 17579177 (Pubitemid 46983219)
29. Diagnostic performance of MR arthrography after rotator cuff repair. Duc SR, Mengiardi B, Pfirrmann CW, Jost B, Hodler J, Zanetti M, AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006 186 237 241 10.2214/AJR.04.1818 16357409 (Pubitemid 46100388)
30. Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0 T: relaxation times and image contrast. Gold GE, Han E, Stainsby J, Wright G, Brittain J, Beaulieu C, AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004 183 343 351 15269023 (Pubitemid 38970323)
31. Three-dimensional isotropic shoulder MR arthrography: comparison with two-dimensional MR arthrography for the diagnosis of labral lesions at 3.0 T. Jung JY, Yoon YC, Choi SH, Kwon JW, Yoo J, Choe BK, Radiology 2009 250 498 505 10.1148/radiol.2493071548 19188318
32. Rotator cuff tears: value of 3.0T MRI. Lambert A, Loffroy R, Guiu B, Mejean N, Lerais JM, Cercueil JP, Krausé D, J Radiol 2009 90 583 588 10.1016/S0221-0363(09)74024-7 19503046
33. 3-T MRI of the shoulder: is MR arthrography necessary? Magee T, AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009 192 86 92 10.2214/AJR.08.1097 19098184
34. 3.0-T MRI of the supraspinatus tendon. Magee T, Williams D, AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006 187 881 886 10.2214/AJR.05.1047 16985129 (Pubitemid 44453936)
35. Evaluation of the glenoid labrum with 3-T MRI: is intraarticular contrast necessary? Major NM, Browne J, Domzalski T, Cothran RL, Helms CA, AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011 196 1139 1144 10.2214/AJR.08.1734 21512082
36. Cartilage MR imaging at 3.0 versus that at 1.5 T: preliminary results in a porcine model. Masi JN, Sell CA, Phan C, Han E, Newitt D, Steinbach L, Majumdar S, Link TM, Radiology 2005 236 140 150 10.1148/radiol.2361040747 15987970 (Pubitemid 40853306)
37. Clinical update: MR imaging of the shoulder. Murray PJ, Shaffer BS, Sports Med Arthrosc 2009 17 40 48 10.1097/JSA.0b013e31819602a6 19204551
38. High-field and ultrahigh-field magnetic resonance imaging: new possibilities for imaging joints. Trattnig S, Mamisch TC, Noebauer I, Z Rheumatol 2006 65 681 687 10.1007/s00393-006-0121-9 17106667 (Pubitemid 46020487)
39. Results of a second attempt at surgical repair of a failed initial rotator cuff repair. DeOrio JK, Cofield RH, J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984 66 563 567 6707035 (Pubitemid 14136831)
40. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Constant CR, Murley AH, Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987 214 160 164 3791738 (Pubitemid 17019681)
41. Matsen FA III, Lippitt SB, Sidles JA, Harryman DT II, Practical Evaluation and Management of the Shoulder Philadelphia: Saunders C 1996
42. The double-pulley technique for double-row rotator cuff repair. Arrigoni P, Brady PC, Burkhart SS, Arthroscopy 2007 23 675 e1-4 17560485
43. Retear patterns after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: single-row versus suture bridge technique. Cho NS, Yi JW, Lee BG, Rhee YG, Am J Sports Med 2010 38 664 671 10.1177/0363546509350081 20040768
44. Prospective randomized clinical trial of single- versus double-row suture anchor repair in 2- to 4-cm rotator cuff tears: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results. Koh KH, Kang KC, Lim TK, Shon MS, Yoo JC, Arthroscopy 2011 27 453 462 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.11.059 21444007
45. Functional and structural outcome after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: single-row versus dual-row fixation. Sugaya H, Maeda K, Matsuki K, Moriishi J, Arthroscopy 2005 21 1307 1316 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.08. 011 16325080 (Pubitemid 41735195)
46. The disabled throwing shoulder: spectrum of pathology Part III: The SICK scapula, scapular dyskinesis, the kinetic chain, and rehabilitation. Burkhart SS, Morgan CD, Kibler WB, Arthroscopy 2003 19 641 661 10.1016/S0749-8063(03) 00389-X 12861203 (Pubitemid 36807698)
47. Effect of fiber distribution and realignment on the nonlinear and inhomogeneous mechanical properties of human supraspinatus tendon under longitudinal tensile loading. Lake SP, Miller KS, Elliott DM, Soslowsky LJ, J Orthop Res 2009 27 1596 1602 10.1002/jor.20938 19544524
48. Medial versus lateral supraspinatus tendon properties: implications for double-row rotator cuff repair. Wang VM, Wang FC, McNickle AG, Friel NA, Yanke AB, Chubinskaya S, Romeo AA, Verma NN, Cole BJ, Am J Sports Med 2010 38 2456 2463 10.1177/0363546510376817 20929937
49. Effect of age on functional and structural outcome after rotator cuff repair. Oh JH, Kim SH, Kang JY, Oh CH, Gong HS, Am J Sports Med 2010 38 672 678 10.1177/0363546509352460 20357401
50. Factors affecting healing rates after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. Tashjian RZ, Hollins AM, Kim HM, Teefey SA, Middleton WD, Steger-May K, Galatz LM, Yamaguchi K, Am J Sports Med 2010 38 2435 2442 10.1177/0363546510382835 21030564
51. Which method of rotator cuff repair leads to the highest rate of structural healing? A systematic review. Duquin TR, Buyea C, Bisson LJ, Am J Sports Med 2010 38 835 841 10.1177/0363546509359679 20357403