Prospective randomised comparison of arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair of the supraspinatus tendon

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 35, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1663-1670

  Kasten, Philip ^a   Keil, Christoph ^b   Grieser, Thomas ^b   Raiss, Patric ^b   Streich, Nikolaus ^b   Loew, Markus ^c  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^c ATOS KLINIK HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DICLOFENAC; NONSTEROID ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT; TRAMADOL;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONSTANT MURLEY SCORE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEGENERATION; DISEASE COURSE; FATTY DEGENERATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT CONTRACTURE; JOINT SURGERY; MALE; MINI OPEN ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR; MUSCLE ATROPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANGE OF MOTION; ROTATOR CUFF INJURY; SCORING SYSTEM; SHOULDER ARTHROSCOPY; SUPRASPINATUS MUSCLE TENDON; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SUTURE ANCHOR; SUTURING METHOD; TENDON; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; AGED; ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AGENTS, NON-STEROIDAL; ARTHROSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; ROTATOR CUFF; SHOULDER JOINT; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TENDON INJURIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 80755135363     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: 14325195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-011-1262-2     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. P Boileau N Brassart DJ Watkinson M Carles AM Hatzidakis SG Krishnan 2005 Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus: does the tendon really heal? J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 1229 1240 15930531 10.2106/JBJS.D.02035 (Pubitemid 40756623)
2. SH Kim KI Ha JH Park JS Kang SK Oh I Oh 2003 Arthroscopic versus mini-open salvage repair of the rotator cuff tear: outcome analysis at 2 to 6 years' follow-up Arthroscopy 19 746 754 12966383 10.1016/S0749-8063(03)00395-5 (Pubitemid 37108232)
3. L Lafosse R Brozska B Toussaint R Gobezie 2007 The outcome and structural integrity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with use of the double-row suture anchor technique J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 1533 1541 17606793 10.2106/JBJS.F.00305 (Pubitemid 47041531)
4. S Lichtenberg D Liem P Magosch P Habermeyer 2006 Influence of tendon healing after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair on clinical outcome using single-row Mason-Allen suture technique: a prospective, MRI controlled study Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14 1200 1206 16845547 10.1007/s00167-006- 0132-8 (Pubitemid 44705170)
5. AM Sauerbrey CL Getz M Piancastelli JP Iannotti ML Ramsey GR Williams Jr 2005 Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a comparison of clinical outcome Arthroscopy 21 1415 1420 16376228 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.09.008 (Pubitemid 41821018)
6. K Yamaguchi CM Ball LM Galatz 2001 Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: transition from mini-open to all-arthroscopic Clin Orthop Relat Res 390 83 94 11550880 10.1097/00003086-200109000-00011 (Pubitemid 32816781)
7. K Yamaguchi WN Levine G Marra LM Galatz S Klepps EL Flatow 2003 Transitioning to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: the pros and cons Instr Course Lect 52 81 92 12690842
8. T Motycka B Kriegleder F Landsiedl 2001 Results of open repair of the rotator cuff-a long-term review of 79 shoulders Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 121 148 151 11262780 10.1007/s004020000199 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7mtlaltQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32171035)
9. RH Cofield J Parvizi PJ Hoffmeyer WL Lanzer DM Ilstrup CM Rowland 2001 Surgical repair of chronic rotator cuff tears. A prospective long-term study J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A 71 77 11205861 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7is1eqtw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32116110)
10. NN Verma W Dunn RS Adler FA Cordasco A Allen J MacGillivray E Craig RF Warren DW Altchek 2006 All-arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a retrospective review with minimum 2-year follow-up Arthroscopy 22 587 594 16762695 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.01.019 (Pubitemid 43817418)
11. JJ Warner P Tétreault J Lehtinen D Zurakowski 2005 Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a cohort comparison study Arthroscopy 21 328 332 15756188 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.11.006 (Pubitemid 40341410)
12. T Youm DH Murray EN Kubiak AS Rokito JD Zuckerman 2005 Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a comparison of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14 455 459 16194734 10.1016/j.jse.2005.02.002 (Pubitemid 41376544)
13. T Colegate-Stone R Allom A Tavakkolizadeh J Sinha 2009 An analysis of outcome of arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair using subjective and objective scoring tools Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17 691 694 19002667 10.1007/s00167-008-0661-4 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MznsFeqsA%3D%3D
14. NL Millar X Wu R Tantau E Silverstone GA Murrell 2009 Open versus two forms of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair Clin Orthop Relat Res 467 966 978 19184264 10.1007/s11999-009-0706-0
15. E Buess KU Steuber B Waibl 2005 Open versus arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a comparative view of 96 cases Arthroscopy 21 597 604 15891728 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.01.002 (Pubitemid 40712223)
16. EL Severud C Ruotolo DD Abbott WM Nottage 2003 All-arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a long-term retrospective outcome comparison Arthroscopy 19 234 238 12627146 10.1053/jars.2003.50036 (Pubitemid 36298134)
17. M Rickert U Witzel R Kölbel H Georgousis 2002 Primary strength of conventional and alternative suture techniques of the rotator cuff. A biomechanical study Unfallchirurg 105 23 30 11968555 10.1007/s113-002-8161-9 1:STN:280:DC%2BD383jtVyrtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 36082947)
18. AG Schneeberger A von Roll F Kalberer HA Jacob C Gerber 2002 Mechanical strength of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair techniques: an in vitro study J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A 2152 2160 12473702 (Pubitemid 35417693)
19. MC Park ER Cadet WN Levine LU Bigliani CS Ahmad 2005 Tendon-to-bone pressure distributions at a repaired rotator cuff footprint using transosseous suture and suture anchor fixation techniques Am J Sports Med 33 1154 1159 16000662 10.1177/0363546504273053 (Pubitemid 41045187)
20. RS Churchill JK Ghorai 2010 Total cost and operating room time comparison of rotator cuff repair techniques at low, intermediate, and high volume centers: mini-open versus all-arthroscopic J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19 716 721 20137974 10.1016/j.jse.2009.10.011
21. KC Köse E Tezen O Cebesoy E Karadeniz D Guner S Adiyaman M Demirtas 2008 Mini-open versus all-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: comparison of the operative costs and the clinical outcomes Adv Ther 25 249 259 18363045 10.1007/s12325-008-0031-0
22. H Sano T Yamashita I Wakabayashi E Itoi 2007 Stress distribution in the supraspinatus tendon after tendon repair: suture anchors versus transosseous suture fixation Am J Sports Med 35 542 546 17218657 10.1177/0363546506296310 (Pubitemid 46953073)
23. Y Tuoheti E Itoi N Yamamoto N Seki H Abe H Minagawa K Okada Y Shimada 2005 Contact area, contact pressure, and pressure patterns of the tendon-bone interface after rotator cuff repair Am J Sports Med 33 1869 1874 16157853 10.1177/0363546505278256 (Pubitemid 41720587)
24. SW Meier JD Meier 2006 The effect of double-row fixation on initial repair strength in rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study Arthroscopy 22 1168 1173 17084292 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.07.004 (Pubitemid 44648672)
25. RH Cofield 1985 Rotator cuff disease of the shoulder J Bone Joint Surg Am 67 974 979 4019548 1:STN:280:DyaL2M3mtFGitw%3D%3D
26. D Patte 1990 Classification of rotator cuff lesions Clin Orthop Relat Res 254 81 86 2323151 (Pubitemid 20145887)
27. B Fuchs MK Gilbart J Hodler C Gerber 2006 Clinical and structural results of open repair of an isolated one-tendon tear of the rotator cuff J Bone Joint Surg Am 88 309 316 16452742 10.2106/JBJS.E.00117 (Pubitemid 43185132)
28. H Thomazeau Y Rolland C Lucas JM Duval F Langlais 1996 Atrophy of the supraspinatus belly. Assessment by MRI in 55 patients with rotator cuff pathology Acta Orthop Scand 67 264 268 8686465 10.3109/17453679608994685 1:STN:280:DyaK28zgsV2gug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 26237684)
29. H Sugaya K Maeda K Matsuki J Moriishi 2005 Functional and structural outcome after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: single-row versus dual-row fixation Arthroscopy 21 1307 1316 16325080 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.08. 011 (Pubitemid 41735195)
30. TG Sampson JK Nisbet JM Glick 1991 Precision acromioplasty in arthroscopic subacromial decompression of the shoulder Arthroscopy 7 301 307 1750941 10.1016/0749-8063(91)90132-H 1:STN:280:DyaK38%2FovVCitw%3D%3D
31. L Lafosse A Van Raebroeckx R Brzoska 2006 A new technique to improve tissue grip: "the lasso-loop stitch" Arthroscopy 22 1246.e1 1246.e3 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.05.021 (Pubitemid 44648666)
32. CR Constant AH Murley 1987 A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder Clin Orthop Relat Res 214 160 164 3791738 (Pubitemid 17019681)
33. K Yanagisawa K Hamada M Gotoh T Tokunaga Y Oshika M Tomisawa YH Lee A Handa H Kijima H Yamazaki M Nakamura Y Ueyama N Tamaoki H Fukuda 2001 Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in the subacromial bursa is increased in patients with impingement syndrome J Orthop Res 19 448 455 11398859 10.1016/S0736-0266(00)90021-4 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXltVGht7s%3D (Pubitemid 32472016)
34. JY Ko FS Wang HY Huang CJ Wang SL Tseng C Hsu 2008 Increased IL-1beta expression and myofibroblast recruitment in subacromial bursa is associated with rotator cuff lesions with shoulder stiffness J Orthop Res 26 1090 1097 18327798 10.1002/jor.20631 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXps1Shu7k%3D
35. TA Blaine YS Kim I Voloshin D Chen K Murakami SS Chang R Winchester FY Lee RJ O'Keefe LU Bigliani 2005 The molecular pathophysiology of subacromial bursitis in rotator cuff disease J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14 84S 89S 15726092 10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.022 (Pubitemid 40261269)
36. M Gotoh K Hamada H Yamakawa K Yanagisawa M Nakamura H Yamazaki Y Ueyama N Tamaoki A Inoue H Fukuda 2001 Interleukin-1-induced subacromial synovitis and shoulder pain in rotator cuff diseases Rheumatology (Oxford) 40 995 1001 10.1093/rheumatology/40.9.995 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXot1Cktbk%3D
37. K Morse AD Davis R Afra EK Kaye A Schepsis I Voloshin 2008 Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis Am J Sports Med 36 1824 1828 18753683 10.1177/0363546508322903
38. L Osti R Papalia M Paganelli E Denaro N Maffulli 2010 Arthroscopic vs mini-open rotator cuff repair. A quality of life impairment study Int Orthop 34 389 394 19424692 10.1007/s00264-009-0796-z
39. J Ide S Maeda K Takagi 2005 A comparison of arthroscopic and open rotator cuff repair Arthroscopy 21 1090 1098 16171634 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.05.010 (Pubitemid 41323873)
40. NG Mohtadi RM Hollinshead TM Sasyniuk JA Fletcher DS Chan FX Li 2008 A randomized clinical trial comparing open to arthroscopic acromioplasty with mini-open rotator cuff repair for full-thickness rotator cuff tears: disease-specific quality of life outcome at an average 2-year follow-up Am J Sports Med 36 1043 1051 18354140 10.1177/0363546508314409 (Pubitemid 351713042)