Porous metal revision shells for management of contained acetabular bone defects at a mean follow-up of six years: A comparison between up to 50% bleeding host bone contact and more than 50% contact

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 94 B, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 158-162

  Sternheim, A ^a   Backstein, D ^a   Kuzyk, P R T ^a   Goshua, G ^a   Berkovich, Y ^a   Safir, O ^a   Gross, A E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM FRACTURE; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BONE DEFECT; BONE GROWTH; BONE INFECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR FRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; FRICTION; HUMAN; IMPLANT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOLYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE; POROSITY; POROUS METAL ACETABULAR REVISION SHELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RADIOLOGY; RECURRENT DISLOCATION; TRABECULAR BONE;

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEMORRHAGE; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; METALS; MIDDLE AGED; POROSITY; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84856869940     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B2.27871     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Saleh KJ, Holtzman J, Gafni A, et al. Reliability and intraoperative validity of preoperative assessment of standardized plain radiographs in predicting bone loss at revision hip surgery. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2001;83-A:1040-1046. (Pubitemid 32662106)
2. Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty: a 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 1994;9:33-44. (Pubitemid 24060099)
3. Boscainos PJ, Kellett CF, Maury AC, Backstein D, Gross AE. Management of periacetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2007;465:159-165. (Pubitemid 350306509)
4. Schatzker J, Wong MK. Acetabular revision: the role of rings and cages. Clin Orthop 1999;369:187-197.
5. Garcia-Cimbrelo E. Porous-coated cementless acetabular cups in revision surgery: a 6- to 11-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 1999;14:397-406. (Pubitemid 29329791)
6. Garellick G, Karrholm J, Rogmark C, Herberts P. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register: annual report, 2009. http://www.shpr.se/en/Publications/ DocumentsReports. aspx (date last accessed 28 November 2011).
7. Bobyn JD, Pilliar RM, Cameron HU, Weatherly GC, Kent GM. The effect of porous surface configuration on the tensile strength of fixation of implants by bone ingrowth. Clin Orthop 1980;149:291-298. (Pubitemid 10082456)
8. Bobyn JD, Poggie RA, Krygier JJ, et al. Clinical validation of a structural porous tantalum biomaterial for adult reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A(Suppl):123-129. (Pubitemid 39628356)
9. Bobyn JD, Stackpool GJ, Hacking SA, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1999;81-B:907-914. (Pubitemid 29438375)
10. Levine BR, Sporer S, Poggie RA, Della Valle CJ, Jacobs JJ. Experimental and clinical performance of porous tantalum in orthopedic surgery. Biomaterials 2006;27:4671-4681. (Pubitemid 43849977)
11. Lakstein D, Backstein D, Safir O, Kosashvili Y, Gross AE. Trabecular metal cups for acetabular defects with 50% or less host bone contact. Clin Orthop 2009;467:2318-2324.
12. Lakstein D, Kosashvili Y, Backstein D, Safir O, Gross AE. Modified extended trochanteric osteotomy with preservation of posterior structures. Hip Int 2010;20 :102-108.
13. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty: an end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1969;51-A:737-755.
14. Skyttä ET, Eskelinen A, Paavolainen PO, Remes VM. Early results of 827 trabecular metal revision shells in acetabular revision. J Arthroplasty 2011;26:342-345.
15. DeLee JG, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 1976;121:20-32. (Pubitemid 8003188)
16. Van Kleunen JP, Lee GC, Lementowski PW, Nelson CL, Garino JP. Acetabular revisions using trabecular metal cups and augments. J Arthroplasty 2009;24(Suppl):64-68.
17. Davies JH, Laflamme GY, Delisle J, Fernandes J. Trabecular metal used for major bone loss in acetabular hip revision. J Arthroplasty 2011:Epub.
18. Campbell DG, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Reliability of acetabular bone defect classification systems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2001;16:83-86. (Pubitemid 32097233)
19. Gross AE, Goodman S. The role of cages and rings: when all else fails. Orthopedics 2004;27:969-970. (Pubitemid 39248068)
20. Goodman S, Saastamoinen H, Shasha N, Gross A. Complications of ilioischial reconstruction rings in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004;19:436-446. (Pubitemid 38725925)
21. Symeonides PP, Petsatodes GE, Pournaras JD, et al. The effectiveness of the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for acetabular bone deficiency: five to twentyone years' follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:168-174.
22. Schlegel UJ, Bitsch RG, Pritsch M, et al. Acetabular reinforcement rings in revision total hip arthroplasty: midterm results in 298 cases. Orthopade 2008;37:904, 906-913 (in German).
23. Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Cruz-Pardos A, Garcia-Rey E, Ortega-Chamarro J. The survival and fate of acetabular reconstruction with impaction grafting for large defects. Clin Orthop 2010;468:3304-3313.
24. Busch VJ, Gardeniers JW, Verdonschot N, Slooff TJ, Schreurs BW. Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than fifty years old: a concise follow-up, at twenty to twenty-eight years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2011;93-A:367-371.