Cementless fixation in Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: A multicentre study of 1000 knees

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 95 B, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 181-187

  Liddle, A D ^a   Pandit, H ^a   O'Brien, S ^b   Doran, E ^b   Penny, I D ^c   Hooper, G J ^c   Burn, P J ^c   Dodd, C A F ^d   Beverland, D E ^b   Maxwell, A R ^c   Murray, D W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b MUSGRAVE PARK HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^d NUFFIELD ORTHOPAEDIC CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE IMPLANT; CEMENTATION; CEMENTLESS OXFORD UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE FIXATION; HUMAN; KNEE IMPLANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURVIVAL; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION; AVASCULAR NECROSIS; CEMENTED PROSTHESIS; CEMENTLESS PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE; PROSTHESIS DISLOCATION; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; ROTATING HINGE KNEE PROSTHESIS; SURVIVAL RATE; TIBIA FRACTURE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE CEMENTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; OSTEONECROSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84874028957     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.30411     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Pandit H, Jenkins C, Barker K., Dodd CA, Murray DW The Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement using a minimally-invasive approach. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006; 88-B:54-60.
2. Lisowski LA, van den Bekerom MP, Pilot P, van Dijk CN, Lisowski AE. Oxford Phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: medium-term results of a minimally invasive surgical procedure. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19:277-284.
3. Price AJ, Svard U. A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469:174-179.
4. Bartley RE, Stulberg SD, Robb W.J., 3rd, Sweeney HJ. Polyethylene wear in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; 299:18-24.
5. Kendrick BJ, Simpson DJ, Kaptein B.L., et al Polyethylene wear of mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacement at 20 years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2011; 93-B:470-475.
6. Price AJ, Short A, Kellett C., et al Ten-year in vivo wear measurement of a fully congruent mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005; 87-B:1493-1497.
7. No authors listed. National Joint Registry for England and Wales: 8th annual report, 2011. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/Reports, PublicationsandMinutes/tabid/85/Default.aspx (date last accessed 31 October 2012).
8. No authors listed. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry: annual report, 2011. http://www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/ aoanjrr/publications.jsp (date last accessed 31 October 2012).
9. No authors listed. Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register: annual report 2010. http://www.knee.nko.se/english/online/thePages/publication.php (date last accessed 31 October 2012).
10. Pandit H, Jenkins C, Beard D.J., et al Cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement shows reduced radiolucency at one year. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009; 91-B:185-189.
11. Liddle AD, Pandit H, Jenkins C., et al Cemented versus cementless fixation in Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at five years: a randomised controlled trial. Paper presented at: British Orthopaedic Association Annual Meeting, Manchester, 2012.
12. Hooper GJ, Maxwell AR, Wilkinson B, et al The early radiological results of the uncemented Oxford medial compartment knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2012; 94-B:334-338.
13. Goodfellow JW, Kershaw CJ, Benson M.K., O'Connor JJ. The Oxford Knee for uni-compartmental osteoarthritis: the first 103 cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1988; 70-B:692-701.
14. Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill H.S., et al Unnecessary contraindications for mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2011; 93-B:622-628.
15. Beard DJ, Pandit H, Gill H.S., et al The influence of the presence and severity of preexisting patellofemoral degenerative changes on the outcome of the Oxford medial uni-compartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007; 89-B:1597-1601.
16. Beard DJ, Pandit H, Ostlere S., et al Pre-operative clinical and radiological assessment of the patellofemoral joint in unicompartmental knee replacement and its influence on outcome. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007; 89-B:1602-1607.
17. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D., Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1998; 80-B:63-69.
18. Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K., et al The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007; 89-B:1010-1014.
19. Goodfellow J, O'Connor J, Dodd C, Murray D. Unicompartmental arthroplasty with the Oxford knee. USA: Oxford University Press, 2006.
20. Price AJ, Webb J, Topf H., et al Rapid recovery after oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16:970-976.
21. Gulati A, Chau R, Pandit H.G., et al The incidence of physiological radiolucency following Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement and its relationship to outcome. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009; 91-B:896-902.
22. Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill H.S., et al Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompart-mental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2011; 93-B:198-204.
23. Landis JR, Koch GG The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33:159-174.
24. Tibrewal SB, Grant KA, Goodfellow JW The radiolucent line beneath the tibial components of the Oxford meniscal knee. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1984; 66-B:523-528.
25. Keys GW, Ul-Abiddin Z, Toh EM Analysis of first forty Oxford medial unicompart-mental knee replacement from a small district hospital in UK. Knee 2004; 11:375-377.
26. Dervin GF, Carruthers C, Feibel R.J., et al Initial experience with the Oxford Uni-compartmental Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26:192-197.
27. Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lewold S., Lidgren L. The routine of surgical management reduces failure after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2001; 83-B:45-49.
28. Rees JL, Price AJ, Beard D.J., Dodd CA, Murray DW Minimally invasive Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: functional results at 1 year and the effect of surgical inexperience. Knee 2004; 11:363-367.
29. Voss F, Sheinkop MB, Galante J.O., Barden RM, Rosenberg AG Miller-Galante unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 2- to 5-year follow-up evaluations. J Arthroplasty 1995; 10:764-771.
30. Ecker ML, Lotke PA, Windsor R.E., Cella JP Long-term results after total condylar knee arthroplasty: significance of radiolucent lines. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987; 216:151-158.
31. Kalra S, Smith TO, Berko B, Walton NP Assessment of radiolucent lines around the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: sensitivity and specificity for loosening. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2011; 93-B:777-781.
32. Simpson DJ, Price AJ, Gulati A, Murray D.W., Gill HS Elevated proximal tibial strains following unicompartmental knee replacement: a possible cause of pain. Med Eng Phys 2009; 31:752-757.
33. Clarius M, Haas D, Aldinger P.R., et al Periprosthetic tibial fractures in unicom-partmental knee arthroplasty as a function of extended sagittal saw cuts: an experimental study. Knee 2010; 17:57-60.
34. Rudol G, Jackson MP, James SE Medial tibial plateau fracture complicating uni-compartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22:148-150.
35. Sloper PJ, Hing CB, Donell S.T., Glasgow MM Intra-operative tibial plateau fracture during unicompartmental knee replacement: a case report. Knee 2003; 10:367-369.
36. Seeger JB, Haas D, Jäger S, et al Extended sagittal saw cut significantly reduces fracture load in cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared to cemented tibia plateaus: an experimental cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20:1087-1091.