Simulating peer support for victims of cyberbullying

Belgian/Netherlands Artificial Intelligence Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  van der Zwaan, Janneke ^a   Dignum, Virginia ^a   Jonker, Catholijn ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMBODIED CONVERSATIONAL AGENT; EMOTIONAL STATE; PEER SUPPORT;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

COMPUTER CRIME;

EID: 84874009062     PISSN: 15687805     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. C. Adam and P. Ye. Reasoning about emotions in an engaging interactive toy (extended abstract). In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Autonomous agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2009), pages 31-32, 2009.
2. A.L. Baylor. Promoting motivation with virtual agents and avatars: role of visual presence and appearance. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1535):3559-3565, 2009.
3. N. Bee, E. André, and T. Vogd. First ideas on the use of affective cues in an empathic computer-based companion. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Autonomous agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2009), pages 13-17, 2009.
4. T.W. Bickmore and R.W. Picard. Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 12(2):293-327, 2005.
5. J. Broekens andW.P. Brinkman. Affectbutton: Towards a standard for dynamic affective user feedback. In Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII) 2009, 2009.
6. W. Cassidy, M. Jackson, and K.N. Brown. Sticks and stones can break my bones, but how can pixels hurt me?: Students' experiences with cyber-bullying. School Psychology International, 30(4):383-402, 2009.
7. H. Cowie, P. Naylor, L. Talamelli, P. Chauhan, and P.K. Smith. Knowledge, use of and attitudes towards peer support: a 2-year follow-up to the prince's trust survey. Journal of Adolescence, 25(5):453-467,2002.
8. D. Coyle, G. Doherty, M. Matthews, and J. Sharry. Computers in talk-based mental health interventions. Interacting with Computers, 19(4):545-562, 2007.
9. M. Davis. Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach. Brown and Benchmark Publishers, 1994.
10. F. Dehue, C. Bolman, and T. Vollink. Cyberbullying: youngsters' experiences and parental perception. Cyberpsychology & Behavior: the Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society, 11(2):217-223, 2008.
11. J. Dias and A. Paiva. Feeling and reasoning: A computational model for emotional characters. Progress in Artificial Intelligence, pages 127-140, 2005.
12. D. Finkelhor, K.J. Mitchell, and J. Wolak. Online victimization: A report on the nation's youth. Technical report, 2000.
13. B.J. Fogg. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do, chapter Computers as Persuasive Social Actors. Acm, New York, NY, USA, 2002.
14. Kaiser Family Foundation. Generation m2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Technical report, 2010.
15. J. Geuze, P. Desain, and J. Ringelberg. Re-phrase: chat-by-click: a fundamental new mode of human communication over the internet. In CHI '08: CHI '08 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 3345-3350, New York, NY, USA, 2008. Acm.
16. D. Heylen. Sensitive empathic agents. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Autonomous agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2009), pages 9-12, 2009.
17. K. Hone. Empathic agents to reduce user frustration: The effects of varying agent characteristics. Interact. Comput., 18(2):227-245, 2006.
18. C.L. Lisetti and E. Wagner. Mental health promotion with animated characters: Exploring issues and potential. In AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report, volume Ss-08-04, pages 72-79, 2008.
19. F. Mishna, C. Cook, M. Saini, M.J. Wu, and R. MacFadden. Interventions to prevent and reduce cyber abuse of youth: A systematic review. Research on Social Work Practice, 2010.
20. R. Morrison. Empathy from avatars: Propositions for improving trust development in pseudo-social relationships with avatars. European Journal of Social Sciences, 12(2):298-309, 2009.
21. D. Olweus. The Nature of School Bullying: a Cross-national Perspective, chapter Sweden, pages 7-27. Routledge, New York, 1999.
22. A. Ortony, G.L. Clore, and A. Collins. The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge Univ. Press, 1988.
23. A. Paiva, J. Dias, D. Sobral, R. Aylett, S. Woods, L. Hall, and C. Zoll. Learning by feeling: Evoking empathy with synthetic characters. Applied Artificial Intelligence: An International Journal, 19(3):235-266, 2005.
24. P.K. Smith, J. Mahdavi, M. Carvalho, S. Fisher, S. Russell, and N. Tippett. Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4):376-385,2008.
25. B.R. Steunebrink, N.L. Vergunst, C.P. Mol, F.P.M. Dignum, M.M. Dastani, and J.-J.C. Meyer. A generic architecture for a companion robot. In J. Filipe, J.A. Cetto, and J.-L. Ferrier, editors, Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics (ICINCO'08), pages 315-321, 2008.
26. A.D. Thierer. Five online safety task forces agree: Education, empowerment & self-regulation are the answer. Progress & Freedom Foundation Progress on Point Paper, 16(13), 2009.
27. R.S. Tokunaga. Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3):277-287, 2010.
28. M.L. Ybarra, K.J. Mitchell, J. Wolak, and D. Finkelhor. Examining characteristics and associated distress related to internet harassment: Findings from the second youth internet safety survey. Pediatrics, 118(4):1169-1177, 2006.