Plural-marking in L2 Korean: A feature-based approach

Second Language Research

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 57-86

  Hwang, Sun Hee ^a   Lardiere, Donna ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

English learners of Korean; feature reassembly; Korean plural; L2 features; L2 Korean; L2 morphosyntax; L2 number marking

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873962167     PISSN: 02676583     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0267658312461496     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. AnY (2007) Korean tul and English all. LSO Working Papers in Linguistics 7: Proceedings of WIGL, pp. 1-16.
2. Borer HIn Name Only: Structuring Sense: vol 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005:.
3. BrissonCM (1998) Distributivity, maximality and floating quantifiers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
4. Carroll SEInput and evidence: The Raw Material of Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 2001:.
5. Chierchia G.Reference to kinds across languages.Natural Language Semantics. 1998;6:339-405.
6. Cho Y-M,Lee HS,Schulz C,Sohn H-M,Sohn S-OIntegrated Korean: Intermediate 2. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press; 2001:.
7. Cho Y-M,Lee HS,Schulz C,Sohn H-M,Sohn S-OIntegrated Korean: Beginning 1. 2010) Integrated Korean: Beginning 1. 2nd ed.Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press; 2010:.
8. Chomsky NKen Hale: A Life in Language. Kenstowicz M, ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2001:1-52.
9. Chung DProceedings of the Spring Korean Generative Grammar Circle. Daejeon: Chungnam National University; 2003:75-83.
10. Chung D.Multiple dominance analysis of right node raising constructions.Language Research. 2004;40:791-812.
11. DeKeyser RM.What makes learning second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues.Language Learning. 2005;55:1-25.
12. Franceschina FFossilized Second Language Grammars: The Acquisition of Grammatical Gender. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 2005:.
13. GebhardtL (2009) Numeral classifiers and the structure of DP. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
14. Harley H,Ritter E.Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis.Language. 2002;78:482-526.
15. Hawkins R,Casillas G.Explaining frequency of verb morphology in early L2 speech.Lingua. 2008;118:595-612.
16. Hawkins R,Hattori H.Interpretation of English multiple wh- questions by Japanese speakers: A missing uninterpretable feature account.Second Language Research. 2006;22:269-301.
17. Hoeksema JPartitives: Studies on the Syntax and Semantics of Partitive and Related Constructions. Hoeksema J, ed. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter; 1996:57-106.
18. HwangSH (in preparation) The acquisition of Korean plural-marking by native English speakers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
19. Joh Y-KProceedings of SuB9. Maier EBary CHuitink J, ed. Nijmegen: Nijmegen Centre for Semantics; 2005:170-82.
20. KimC-E (2012) Acquisition of the distributive meaning of EPM in Korean. Working Papers in Linguistics: University of Hawai'i at Manoa43: 1-10.
21. KimC (2005) The Korean plural marker tul and its implications. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
22. Kim YTheoretical issues in Korean linguistics. Kim-Renaud Y-K, ed. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information; 1994:303-323.
23. Kim-Marshall IKStep by Step: Korean 1 through 15 Action Verbs. Seoul: Hankwuk; 2008:.
24. Kwon S,Zribi-Hertz AEmpirical Issues in formal syntax and semantics. Bonami OCabredo Hofherr P, ed. 2004:133-158.
25. Lardiere DSecond language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory. Archibald J, ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2000:102-29.
26. Lardiere DThe Role of Formal Features in Second Language Acquisition. Liceras JZobl HGoodluck H, ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2008:106-140.
27. Lardiere D.Some thoughts on a contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition.Second Language Research. 2009;25:173-227.
28. Lee-Ellis S.The development and validation of a Korean c-test using Rasch analysis.Language Testing. 2009;26:245-274.
29. McCarthy C.Morphological variability in the comprehension of agreement: An argument for representation over computation.Second Language Research. 2008;24:459-486.
30. McCarthy C.Modeling morphological variation and development: Person and number in L2 Spanish.Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. 2012;2:25-53.
31. Moon SC.Plural marker -tul is subject to Principle A.Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics. 1995;6:355-369.
32. Nemoto N.On mass denotations of bare nouns in Japanese and Korean.Linguistics. 2005;43:383-413.
33. Noh E.A study on the meaning of Korean zero-marked and 'tul'-marked nouns.Discourse and Cognition. 2008;15:43-62.
34. Papadopoulou D,Varlokosta S,Spyropoulos V.Case morphology and word order in second language Turkish: Evidence from Greek learners.Second Language Research. 2011;27:173-205.
35. Park JULittle words: Their History, Phonology, Syntax, Semantics, Pragmatics and Acquisition. Leow RCampos HLardiere D, ed. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2009:.
36. ParkM-KSohnK-W (1993) A minimalist approach to plural marker licensing in Korean. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics20: 193-208. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
37. Schmitt C,Miller KExperimental Methods in Language Acquisition Methodology. Unsworth SBlom E, ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 2010:35-56.
38. Schwartz BD.On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting 'competence' and 'linguistic behavior'.Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 1993;15:147-163.
39. Schwartz BD,Sprouse RA.L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model.Second Language Research. 1996;12:40-72.
40. Song JJ.The so-called plural copy in Korean as a marker of distribution and focus.Journal of Pragmatics. 1997;27:203-224.
41. Song SCA ubiquitous plural marker. Korea Research Monograph, no. 14: Explorations in Korean syntax and semantics. University of California at Berkeley, Institute of East Asian Studies and Center for Korean Studies; 1988:.
42. Sorace AThe Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Doughty CJLong MH, ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2003:130-151.
43. Sorace A.Pinning down the concept of 'interface' in bilingualism.Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. 2011;1:1-33.
44. Tsimpli IM,Dimitrakopoulou M.The interpretability hypothesis: Evidence from wh- interrogatives in second language acquisition.Second Language Research. 2007;23:215-42.
45. Tsimpli IM,Mastropavlou MThe Role of Formal Features in Second Language Acquisition. Liceras JMZobl HGoodluck H, ed. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2008:142-183.
46. White L,Valenzuela E,Kozlowska-Macgregor M,Leung Y-KI.Gender and number agreement in nonnative Spanish.Applied Psycholinguistics. 2004;25:105-133.
47. Wilder CStudies on Universal Grammar and Typological Variation. Alexiadou AHall TA, ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 1997:59-107.
48. Wilder CWCCFL 18 Proceedings. Brid SCarmie SJaugen JNorquest P, ed. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press; 1999:586-598.
49. Yim C.The semantics of non-nominal.tul Journal of the International Circle of Korean Linguistics. 2002;11:183-202.
50. Yim CThe Role of Agreement in Natural Languages: TLS 5 Proceedings. Griffin WE, ed. 2003:147-156.