Disciplinarity

The Routledge International Handbook of Higher Education

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 487-500

  Neumann, Ruth ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873925562     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203882221-35     Document Type: Chapter

References (65)

1. Becher, T. (1983). The cultural view. In: Clark, B.R. (ed.) Perspectives on Higher Education: Eight Disciplinary and Comparative Views. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
2. Becher, T. (1989). Academic Tribes and Territories. Buckingham: Open University Press.
3. Becher, T. (1994). The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education, 19(2), 151-161.
4. Becher, T., Kogan, M. and Henkel, M. (1994). Graduate Education in Britain. London: Jessica Kingsley.
5. Becher, T. and Trowler, P. (2001). Academic Tribes and Territories. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2nd edition.
6. Biglan, A. (1973a). The characteristics of subject matter in different scientific areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195-203.
7. Biglan, A. (1973b). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 204-213.
8. Blackmore, P. (2007). Disciplinary differences in academic leadership and management and its development: a significant factor? Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 12(2), 225-239.
9. Braxton, J.M. and Hargens, L.L. (1996). Variation among academic disciplines: analytical frameworks and research. In: Smart, J.C. (ed.) Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Vol. XI. New York: Agathon Press. 1-46.
10. Breen, R. and Lindsay, R. (2002). Different disciplines require different motivations for student success. Research in Higher Education, 43(6), 693-725.
11. Carter, M. (2007). Ways of knowing, doing, and writing the disciplines. College Composition and Communication, 58(3), 385-418.
12. Church, C. (1976). Disciplinary dynamics. Studies in Higher Education, 1(2), 101-118.
13. Clark, B. (1983). The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
14. Clark, B. (1984). The organizational conception. In: Clark, B. (ed.) Perspectives on Higher Education: Eight disciplinary and comparative views. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. pp. 106-131.
15. Clark, B. (1987). The Academic Life: Small worlds, different worlds. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
16. Creswell, J.W. and Bean, J.P. (1981). Research output, socialization, and the Biglan model. Research in Higher Education, 15(1), 69-91.
17. Creswell, J.W. and Roskens, R.W. (1981). The Biglan studies of differences among academic areas. The Review of Higher Education, 4(3), 1-16.
18. Creswell, J.W., Seagren, A.T. and Henry, T. (1981). Professional development training needs of department chairpersons: a test of the Biglan model. Planning and Change, 10, 224-237.
19. Frank, D., Wong, S., Meyer, J. and Ramirez, R. (2000). What counts as history: A cross-national and longitudinal study of university curricula. Comparative Education Review, 44(1), 29-53
20. Gabler, J. and Frank, D. (2005). The natural sciences in the university: Change and variation over the 20th century. Sociology of Education, 78, July, 183-206.
21. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzmann, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
22. Gordon, P. and Lawton, D. (1993). Dictionary of Education. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
23. Gumport, P.J. and Snydman, S.K. (2002) The formal structure of knowledge: An analysis of academic structure. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(3), 375-408.
24. Hagstrom, W.O. (1965). The differentiation of disciplines. In: Barnes, B. (ed.) (1972). Sociology of Science: Selected readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin. pp. 121-125.
25. Hativa, N. and Marincovich, M. (eds) (1995), Disciplinary Differences in Teaching and Learning: Implications for Practice. No. 64 Winter. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
26. Healey, M. and Jenkins, A. (2003). Discipline-based educational development. In: Eggins, H. and Macdonald, R. (eds) The Scholarship of Academic Development. Buckingham: Open University Press. pp. 47-57.
27. Henkel, M. (2000). Academic Identities and Policy Change in Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley.
28. Hirt, J. and Muffo, J. (1998). Graduate students: Institutional climates and disciplinary cultures. New Directions for Institutional Research, 92, 17-33.
29. Huber, M. (2002). Disciplinary styles in the scholarship of teaching: Reflections on the Carnegie Academic for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. In: Huber, M. and Morreale, S. (eds) Disciplinary Styles in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education and The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. pp. 25-44.
30. Huber, M. and Morreale, S. (2002). Situating the scholarship of teaching and learning: A cross-disciplinary conversation. In: Huber, M. and Morreale, S. (eds). Disciplinary Styles in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education and The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, pp. 1-24.
31. Kekale, J. (1999). “Preferred” patterns of academic leadership in different disciplinary (sub)cultures. Higher Education, 37, 217-238.
32. Kekale, J. (2002). Conceptions of quality in four different disciplines. Tertiary Education Management, 8(1), 65-80.
33. Kiger, J. (1971). Disciplines. Encyclopedia of Education. New York: Philosophical Library.
34. Klein, J.T. (2004). Interdisciplinarity and complexity: An evolving relationship. E: CO Special Double Issue 6, No. 1-2, pp. 2-10.
35. Kockelmans, J. (1979). Science and discipline: Some historical and critical reflections. In: Kockelmans, J. (ed.) Interdisciplinarity and Higher Education. London: Pennsylvania State University Press, p. 11-48.
36. Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential Learning. Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
37. Lee, J. (2007). The shaping of the departmental culture: Measuring the relative influences of the institution and discipline, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(1), 41-55.
38. Leff, G. (1968). Paris and Oxford Universities in the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries: An institutional and intellectual history. Sydney: John Wiley and Sons.
39. McInnis, C. and Marginson, S. (1994). Australian Law Schools after the 1987 Pearce Report. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
40. Moran, J. (2002). Interdisciplinarity. London: Routledge.
41. Neumann, R. (2001). Disciplinary differences and university teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 26(2), 135-146.
42. Neumann, R. (2003a). A disciplinary perspective on university teaching and learning. In: Tight, M. (ed.) Access and Exclusion. Oxford, Elsevier. pp. 217-245.
43. Neumann, R. (2003b). The Doctoral Education Experience: Diversity and complexity. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Science.
44. Neumann, R. (2005). Doctoral differences: PhDs and professional doctorates compared. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(2), 173-188.
45. Parry, S. (1998). Disciplinary discourse in doctoral theses. Higher Education, 3, 273-299.
46. Parry, S. (2007). Disciplines and Doctorates. Dordrecht: Springer.
47. Pearce, C., Campbell, E. and Harding, D. (1987). Australian Law Schools: A discipline assessment for the Commonwealth Tertiary Education Commission. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
48. Perkin, H. (1984). The historical perspective. In: Clark, B. (ed.) Perspectives on Higher Education: Eight disciplinary and comparative views. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
49. Redner, H. (1987). The institutionalization of science: a critical synthesis. Social Epistemology, 1(1), 37-59.
50. Rowntree, D. (1982). A Dictionary of Education. Totowa, NJ: Barnes and Noble Books.
51. Rudy, W. (1984). The Universities of Europe, 1100-1914: A history. Rutherford, NJ: Associated University Presses.
52. Ruscio, K. (1987). The distinctive scholarship of the selective liberal arts college. Journal of Higher Education, 58(2), 203-222.
53. Shorter Oxford English Dictionary. (2002). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54. Shulman, L. (2002). Foreword. In: Huber, M. and Morreale, S. (eds) Disciplinary Styles in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education and The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, pp. v-ix
55. Silver, H. (2003). Does a university have a culture? Studies in Higher Education, 28(2), 157-169.
56. Smart, J.C. and Elton (1982). Validation of the Biglan model. Research in Higher Education, 17, 213-229.
57. Stoecker, J. (1993). The Biglan classification revisited. Research in Higher Education, 34(4), 451-464.
58. Storer, N. and Parsons, T. (1968). The disciplines as a differentiating force. In: Montgomery, E. (ed.) The Foundations of Access to Knowledge-A symposium. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University.
59. Straus, R. (1973). Departments and disciplines: stasis and change. Science, 182, 895-989.
60. Swoboda, W. (1979). Disciplines and interdisciplinarity: A historical perspective. In: Kockelmans, J. (ed.) Interdisciplinarity and Higher Education. London: Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 49-92.
61. Tight, M. (2003a). The organisation of academic knowledge: A comparative perspective. Higher Education, 46, 389-410.
62. Tight, M. (2003b). Naming academic knowledge; What is included within the university? In: Tight, M. (ed.) Access and Exclusion. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 247-268.
63. Trowler, P. (1998). Academics Responding to Change: New higher education frameworks and academic cultures. Bristol, PA, USA: Open University Press.
64. Turner, J., Miller, M. and Mitchell-Kernan, C. (2002). Disciplinary cultures and graduate education. Emergences, 12(1), 47-70.
65. Weingart, P. and Stehr, N. (2000). Practising Interdisciplinarity. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.