A disciplinary perspective on university teaching and learning

International Perspectives on Higher Education Research

Volumn 2, Issue , 2003, Pages 217-245

  Neumann, Ruth ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36148946044     PISSN: 14793628     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Adams M. Neumann R. Rytmeister C. Factors which influence student evaluation of teaching ratings Paper presented at the Educational Research Association, Singapore and Australasian Association for Research in Education joint conference Singapore, 25–29 November 1996
2. Ainley J. The 1999 Postgraduate Research Experience Questionnaire 2001 Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs Oxford
3. Anderson E. Campus Use of the Teaching Portfolio: Twenty-Five Profiles 1993 American Association for Higher Education Canberra
4. Angelo T. Cross P. Classroom Assessment Techniques 2nd ed. 1993 JosseyBass Washington, D.C.
5. Ballantyne R. Bain J. Packer J. Researching university teaching in Australia: themes and issues in academics' reflections Studies in Higher Education 24 2 1999 237 257
6. Bazerman C. What written knowledge does Philosophy of the Social Sciences 2 1981 361 387
7. Becher T. The cultural view B. Clark Perspectives on Higher Education: Eight Disciplinary and Comparative Views 1983 University of California Press San Francisco
8. Becher T. Academic Tribes and Territories 1989 Open University Press Berkeley
9. Becher T. Historians on History Studies in Higher Education 14 3 1989 263 278
10. Becher T. Physicists on Physics Studies in Higher Education 15 1 1990 3 20
11. Becher T. The counterculture of specialisation European Journal of Education 25 1990 333 346
12. Becher T. The significance of disciplinary differences Studies in Higher Education 19 2 1994 151 161
13. Becher T. Trowler P. Academic Tribes and Territories 2nd ed. 2001 Open University Press Milton Keynes
14. Biglan A. The characteristics of subject matter in different scientific areas Journal of Applied Psychology 57 3 1973 195 203
15. Biglan A. Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments Journal of Applied Psychology 57 3 1973 204 213
16. Bowen H. Schuster J. American Professors: A National Resource Imperiled 1986 Oxford University Press Buckingham
17. Boyer E. Altbach P. Whitelaw M. The Academic Profession: An International Perspective 1994 The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching New York
18. Braxton J. Disciplines with an affinity for the improvement of undergraduate education N. Hativa M. Marincovich Disciplinary Differences in Teaching and Learning: Implications for Practice 1995 Jossey-Bass New Jersey
19. Braxton J. Hargens L. Variation among academic disciplines: analytical frameworks and research J. Smart Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research Vol. XI 1996 Agathon Press San Francisco 1 46
20. Brown G. Atkins M. Effective Teaching in Higher Education 1988 Routledge New York
21. Brown G. Bakhtar M. Styles of lecturing: a study and its implications Research Papers in Education 3 2 1988 131 153
22. Bruner J. Towards a Theory of Instruction 1967 Harvard University Press London
23. Cashin W. Students do rate different academic fields differently M. Theall J. Franklin Student Ratings of Instruction: Issues for Improving Practice 1990 Jossey-Bass Cambridge, Mass.
24. Cashin W. Clegg V. Are student ratings of different academic fields different? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association Washington, D.C 1987
25. Cashin W. Downey R. Disciplinary differences in what is taught and in students' perceptions of what they learn and of how they are taught N. Hativa M. Marincovich Disciplinary Differences in Teaching and Learning: Implications for Practice 1995 Jossey-Bass San Francisco
26. Church C. Disciplinary dynamics Studies in Higher Education 1 2 1976 101 118
27. Clark B. The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective 1983 University of California Press San Francisco
28. Clark B. The organizational conception B. Clark Perspectives on Higher Education: Eight Disciplinary and Comparative Views 1984 University of California Press Berkeley
29. Clark B. The Academic Life: Small worlds, different worlds 1987 Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching Berkeley
30. Creswell J. Bean J. Research output, socialization, and the Biglan model Research in Higher Education 15 1 1981 69 91
31. Creswell J. Roskens R. The Biglan studies of differences among academic areas The Review of Higher Education 4 3 1981 1 16
32. Creswell J. Seagren A. Henry T. Professional development training needs of department chairpersons: a test of the Biglan model Planning and Change 10 1981 224 237
33. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs The Characteristics and Performance of Higher Education Institutions Occasional Paper series 98-A. 1998 Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs Princeton, N.J.
34. Donald J. Knowledge structures: methods for exploring course content Journal of Higher Education 54 1983 31 41
35. Donald J. Disciplinary differences in knowledge validation N. Hativa M. Marincovich Disciplinary Differences in Teaching and Learning: Implications for Practice 1995 Jossey-Bass Canberra
36. Dunkin M. Research on teaching in higher education M. Wittrock Handbook of Research on Teaching 1986 Macmillan San Francisco
37. Edgerton R. Hutchings P. Quinlan K. The Teaching Portfolio: Capturing the Scholarship in Teaching 1991 American Association for Higher Education New York
38. Entwistle N. Tait H. Approaches to studying and perceptions of the learning environment across disciplines N. Hativa M. Marincovich Disciplinary Differences in Teaching and Learning: Implications for Practice 1995 Jossey-Bass Washington, D.C.
39. Evans T. Meeting what ends? M. Kiley G. Mullins Challenges to doctoral education in Australia Quality in Postgraduate Research: Making Ends Meet 2000 The University of Adelaide San Francisco
40. Feldman K. Course characteristics and college students' ratings of their teachers: What we know and what we don't know Research in Higher Education 9 1978 199 242
41. Fox M. Research, teaching and publication productivity: Mutuality vs. competition in academia Sociology of Education 65 1992 293 305
42. Franklin J. Theall M. The relationship of disciplinary differences and the value of class preparation time to student ratings of teaching N. Hativa M. Marincovich Disciplinary Differences in Teaching and Learning: Implications for Practice 1995 Jossey-Bass Adelaide
43. Gaff J. Wilson R. Faculty cultures and interdisciplinary studies Journal of Higher Education 42 1971 186 201
44. Gibbs G. Are the pedagogies of the disciplines really different? D. Rust Improving Student Learning Through the Disciplines Proceedings of the 1999 7th International Symposium 2000 Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development San Francisco
45. Graduate Careers Council of Australia (GCCA) Graduate Destination Survey 2001 Graduate Careers Council of Australia Oxford
46. Hativa N. What is taught in an undergraduate lecture? N. Hativa M. Marincovich Differences between a matched pair of pure and applied disciplines Disciplinary Differences in Teaching and Learning: Implications for Practice 1995 JosseyBass Parkville, Victoria
47. Hativa N. Teaching in a research university: professors' conceptions, practices, and disciplinary differences Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association Chicago, March 24–28 1997
48. Hativa N. Marincovich M. Disciplinary Differences in Teaching and Learning: Implications for Practice 1995 Jossey-Bass San Francisco
49. Healey M. Developing the scholarship of teaching in higher education: A discipline based approach Higher Education Research and Development 19 2000 167 187
50. Henkel M. Academic Identities and Policy Change in Higher Education 2000 Jessica Kingsley San Francisco
51. 29 January Howard J. Backing Australia's Ability: An innovation action plan for the future Statement 2001 Commonwealth of Australia London
52. Huber M. Disciplinary styles in the scholarship of teaching: Reflections on the Carnegie Academy for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning D. Rust Improving Student Learning Through the Disciplines Proceedings of the 1999 7th International Symposium 2000 Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development Canberra
53. Jenkins A. Discipline-based education development International Journal of Academic Development 1 1 1996 50 62
54. Jenkins A. Healey M. Getting disciplined: Geographic perspectives Herdsa News 22 1 2000 11 13
55. Kolb D. Learning styles and disciplinary differences A. Chickering The Modern American College 1981 Jossey-Bass Oxford 232 255
56. Kolitch E. Dean A. Student ratings of instruction in the USA: Hidden assumptions and missing conceptions about ‘good’ teaching Studies in Higher Education 24 1 1999 27 42
57. Lattuca L. Stark J. Will disciplinary perspectives impede curricular reform? Journal of Higher Education 65 4 1994 401 426
58. Lattuca L. Stark J. Modifying the major: discretionary thoughts from ten disciplines The Review of Higher Education 18 3 1995 315 344
59. Lenze L. Discipline-specific pedagogical knowledge in linguistics and Spanish N. Hativa M. Marincovich Disciplinary Differences in Teaching and Learning: Implications for Practice 1995 Jossey-Bass San Francisco
60. Lindsay A. Neumann R. Formulating Research Policy: Process and Conflict The Australian Universities' Review 30 2 1987 34 38
61. Lodahl J. Gordon G. The structure of scientific fields and the functioning of university graduate departments American Sociological Review 37 1 1972 57 72
62. Long M. Hillman K. Course Experience Questionnaire 1999 A report prepared for the Graduate Careers Council of Australia 2000 GCCA San Francisco
63. Lowe I. University research funding: The wheel still is spinnin' The Australian Universities' Review 30 1987 1
64. Lowe I. University research funding: The wheel still is spinnin' The Australian Universities' Review 30 1987 2 12
65. McInnis C. Marginson S. Australian Law Schools after the 1987 Pearce Report 1994 Australian Government Publishing Service Parkville, Victoria
66. McKinnon K. Walker S. Davis D. Benchmarking: A manual for Australian Universities 2000 Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs Canberra
67. Murray H. Renaud R. Disciplinary differences in classroom teaching behaviors N. Hativa M. Marincovich Disciplinary Differences in Teaching and Learning: Implications for Practice 1995 Jossey-Bass Canberra
68. Neumann R. Communicating student evaluation of teaching results: Rating Interpretation Guides (RIGs) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 25 2 2000 121 134
69. Neumann R. Disciplinary differences and university teaching Studies in Higher Education 26 2 2001 135 146
70. Neumann R. Guthrie J. The corporatisation of research in Australian higher education Paper presented at the 2001 Symposium The University in the New Corporate World, 18 July 2001 University of South Australia San Francisco
71. Neumann R. Lindsay A. Excellence at risk?: The future of research and research training in Australian Universities Australian Quarterly 59 2 1987 199 209
72. in press Neumann R. Parry S. Becher T. Teaching and learning in their disciplinary contexts: A conceptual analysis Studies in Higher Education 27 4 2002
73. Nilson L. Teaching at its Best: A Research-Based Resource for College Instructors 1998 Anker Publishing
74. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Education at a glance: OECD indicators Education and Skills 2001 OECD Bolton, Mass.
75. Parry S. Disciplinary discourse in doctoral theses Higher Education 36 3 1998 273 299
76. Parry S. Dunn L. Benchmarking as a meaning approach to learning in online settings Studies in Continuing Education 22 2 2000 219 234
77. Pearce C. Campbell E. Harding D. Australian Law Schools: A discipline assessment for the Commonwealth Tertiary Education Commission 1987 Australian Government Publishing Service Paris
78. Pearson M. The changing environment for doctoral education in Australia: implications for quality management, improvement and innovation Higher Education Research and Development 18 3 1999 269 287
79. Quinlan K. Case studies of academics' educational beliefs about their discipline: Toward a discourse on scholarly dimensions of teaching Paper presented at the Herdsa Annual International Conference Adelaide, 8–11 July 1997
80. Quinlan K. Promoting faculty learning about collaborative teaching College Teaching 46 2 1998 43 47
81. Quinlan K. Making a difference through department-based, collaborative academic development Herdsa News 22 1 2000 8 10
82. Rust D. Improving Student Learning Through the Disciplines Proceedings of the 1999 7th International Symposium 2000 Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development Canberra
83. Schon D. Educating the Reflective Practitioner 1987 Jossey-Bass Oxford
84. Shulman L. Teaching as community property: Putting an end to pedagogical solitude Change 25 6 1993 6 7
85. Silverman R. Context of knowing: Their shape and substance Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilisation 14 4 1993 372 385
86. Smart J. Elton C. Validation of the Biglan model Research in Higher Education 17 1982 213 229
87. Smart J. Ethington C. Disciplinary and institutional differences in undergraduate education goals N. Hativa M. Marincovich Disciplinary Differences in Teaching and Learning: Implications for Practice 1995 Jossey-Bass San Francisco
88. Smeby J. Disciplinary differences in university teaching Studies in Higher Education 21 1 1996 69 79
89. Smith B. The challenge of making ends meet in postgraduate research training M. Kiley G. Mullins Quality in Postgraduate Research: Making Ends Meet 2000 The University of Adelaide San Francisco
90. Stark J. Lowther M. Bentley R. Martens G. Disciplinary differences in course planning The Review of Higher Education 13 2 1988 141 165
91. Stoecker J. The Biglan classification revisited Research in Higher Education 34 4 1993 451 464
92. Storer N. Parsons T. The disciplines as a differentiating force E. Montgomery The Foundations of Access to Knowledge — A symposium 1968 Syracuse University Adelaide
93. Warren Piper D. Nulty D. O'Grady G. Examination Practices and Procedures in Australian Universities 1996 Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs Syracuse