Double foot-in-the-door, social representations, and environment: Application for energy savings

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 306-315

  Souchet, Lionel ^a   Girandola, Fabien ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873907390     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: 15591816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.01000.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Abric, J. C. (1993). Central system, peripheral system: Their functions and roles in the dynamics of social representations. Papers on Social Representations, 2, 75-78.
2. Abric, J. C. (2001). A structural approach to social representations. In K. Deaux & G. Philogène (Eds.), Representations of the social (pp. 42-47). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
3. Beaman, A., Cole, M., Preston, M., Klentz, B., & Mehrkens-Steblay, N. (1983). Fifteen years of foot-in-the-door research: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 181-196.
4. Bem, D. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1-62). New York: Academic Press.
5. Bonardi, C., Girandola, F., Roussiau, N., & Soubiale, N. (2002). Psychologie sociale appliquée: Environnement, santé et qualité de la vie. Paris: Editions In-Press.
6. Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Burger, J. M. (1999). The foot-in-the-door compliance procedure: A multiple-process analysis and review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 303-325.
8. Cialdini, R. B. (2004). Influence: Science and practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
9. Dillard, J., Hunter, J., & Burgoon, M. (1984). Sequential-request persuasive strategies: Meta-analysis of foot-in-the-door and door-in-the-face. Human Communication Research, 10, 461-488.
10. Dolinski, D. (2000). On inferring one's beliefs from one's attempt and consequences for subsequent compliance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 260-272.
11. Dufourcq-Brana, M., Pascual, A., & Guéguen, N. (2006). Déclaration de liberté et pied-dans-la-porte. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 19, 173-187.
12. Eyssartier, C., Joule, R.-V., & Guimelli, C. (2007). Effets comportementaux et cognitifs de l'engagement dans un acte préparatoire activant un élément central versus périphérique de la représentation du don d'organe. Psychologie Française, 52, 499-517.
13. Fern, E., Monroe, K., & Avila, R. (1986). Effectiveness of multiple request strategies: A synthesis of research results. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 144-152.
14. Flament, C. (1989). Structure et dynamique des représentations sociales. In D. Jodelet (Ed.), Les représentations sociales (pp. 204-219). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
15. Flament, C. (1994). Aspects périphériques des représentations sociales. In C. Guimelli (Ed.), Structures et transformations des représentations sociales (pp. 85-118). Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.
16. Flament, C. (1995). Approche expérimentale de type psychophysique dans l'étude d'une représentation. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie sociale, 28, 67-76.
17. Freedman, J., & Fraser, S. (1966). Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 195-202.
18. Girandola, F. (2003). Psychologie de la persuasion et de l'engagement. Besançon: Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté.
19. Girandola, F., & Joule, R.-V. (2012). La communication engageante: Aspects théoriques et pratiques. L'Année Psychologique, 112, 117-144.
20. Girandola, F., & Roussiau, N. (2003). L'engagement comme source de modification à long terme. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 57, 83-101.
21. Goldman, M., Creason, C., & McCall, C. (1981). Compliance employing a two-feet-in-the-door procedure. The Journal of Social Psychology, 114, 259-265.
22. Goldstein, N. J., & Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Using social norms as a lever of social influence. In A. R. Pratkanis (Ed.), The science of social influence: Advances and future progress (pp. 167-191). New York: Psychology Press.
23. Guéguen, N. (2002). Psychologie de la manipulation et de la soumission. Paris: Dunod.
24. Guimelli, C. (1993). Locating the central core of social representations: Towards a method. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 555-559.
25. Joule, R.-V. (2006). Vie collective et comportements sociaux. In M. Bromberg & A. Trognon (Eds.), Psychologie sociale (pp. 115-130). Paris: Puf.
26. Joule, R. V., & Beauvois, J. L. (1998). La soumission librement consentie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
27. Joule, R. V., & Beauvois, J. L. (2002). Petit traité de manipulation à l'usage des honnêtes gens. Grenoble: PUG.
28. Joule, R. V., Bernard, F., Geissler, A., Girandola, F., & Halimi-Falkowicz, S. (2010). Binding communication at the service of organ donations. International Review of Social Psychology, 23, 211-238.
29. Joule, R. V., Bernard, F., & Halimi-Falkowicz, S. (2008). Promoting ecocitizenship: In favor of binding communication. International Scientific Journal for Alternative Energy and Ecology, 6, 214-218.
30. Joule, R. V., Girandola, F., & Bernard, F. (2007). How can people be induced to willingly change their behavior? The path from persuasive communication to committing communication. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 493-505.
31. Kaiser, F. G., Wölfing, S., & Fuhrer, U. (1999). Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 1-19.
32. Katzev, R. D., & Johnson, T. R. (1983). A social-psychological analysis of residential electricity consumption: The impact of minimal justification techniques. Journal of Economic Psychology, 3, 267-284.
33. Kiesler, C. A. (1971). The psychology of commitment: Experiments linking behavior to belief. New-York: Academic Press.
34. Le Bouedec, G. (1984). Contribution à la méthodologie d'étude des représentations sociales. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 4, 245-272.
35. Miller, R., & Suls, J. (1977). Helping, self-attribution, and the size of an initial request. The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 203-207.
36. Moliner, P. (1989). Validation expérimentale de l'hypothèse du noyau central des représentations sociales. Bulletin de Psychologie, XLI, 759-762.
37. Moscovici, S. (1993). Introductory address. Papers on Social Representations, 2, 160-170.
38. Moscovici, S. (2001). Why a theory of social representations? In K. Deaux & G. Philogène (Eds.), Representations of the social (pp. 8-35). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
39. Moser, G. (2006). Psychologies sociales. Psychologie sociale, application de la psychologie sociale et psychologie sociale appliquée. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 70, 89-95.
40. Moser, G., & Weiss, K. (2003). Espaces de vie: Aspects de la relation homme-environnement. Pairs: Armand Colin.
41. Pratkanis, A. R. (2007). The science of social influence: Advances and future progress. New York: Pyschology Press.
42. Renard, E., Bonardi, C., Roussiau, N., & Girandola, F. (2007). Soumission forcée, double soumission forcée et dynamique des représentations sociales. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 20, 79-130.
43. Schmuck, P., & Schultz, W. (2002). Psychology of sustainable development. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
44. Seligman, C., Bush, M., & Kirsch, K. (1976). Relationship between compliance in the-foot-in-the-door paradigm and size of first request. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 517-720.
45. Shanab, M. I., & O'Neill, P. J. (1982). The effects of self-perception and perceptual contrast upon compliance with socially undesirable requests. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 19, 279-281.
46. Souchet, L., & Tafani, E. (2004). Pratiques, engagement et représentations sociales: Contribution expérimentale à un modèle de la dynamique représentationnelle. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 63, 81-92.
47. Tafani, E., & Souchet, L. (2001). Changement d'attitude et dynamique représentationnelle: les effets de l'engagement dans des pratiques sociales. In P. Moliner (Ed.), La dynamique des représentations sociales (pp. 59-88). Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
48. Tafani, E., & Souchet, L. (2002). Commitment in pro- versus contrattitudinal practices and social representation dynamics. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 61, 34-44.
49. Tafani, E., Souchet, L., Codaccioni, C., & Mugny, G. (2004). Influences majoritaire et minoritaire sur la représentation sociale de la drogue. Nouvelle Revue de Psychologie Sociale, 2, 343-354.
50. Uzzell, D., & Moser, G. (2006). Environment and quality of life. European Review of Applied Psychology, 56, 1-4.
51. Weiss, K., & Girandola, F. (2010). Psychologie et développement durable. Paris: Editions InPress.