Freedom declaration and foot-in-the-door technique;Déclaration de liberté et pied-dans-la-porte

Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale

Volumn 19, Issue 3-4, 2006, Pages 173-187

  Dufourcq Brana, Maya ^a   Pascual, Alexandre ^b   Guéguen, Nicolas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BRETAGNE SUD   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

Author keywords

Commitment; Foot in the door; Freedom declaration; Self perception; Time period between requests

Indexed keywords

EID: 40749098610     PISSN: 0992986X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Beaman, A.L., Cole, C.M., Preston, M., Klentz, B. & Steblay, N.M. (1983). Fifteen years of foot-in-the-door research, a meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9 (2), 181-196.
2. Beaman, A.L., Steblay, N.M., Preston, M. & Klentz, B. (1988). Compliance as a function of elapsed time between first and second request. The Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 233-243.
3. Bem, D. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology, (vol. 6, pp. 1-62). New-York: Academic.
4. Burger, J.M. (1999). The foot-in-the-door compliance procedure: A multiple-process analysis and review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 303-325.
5. Cialdini, R.B., Cacioppo, J.T., Basset, R., Miller, J.A. (1978). Low-ball procedure for producing compliance: commitment then cost. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 463-476.
6. Crano, W.D. & Civacek, J. (1982). Social reinforcement, self attribution and the foot-in-the-door phenomenon. Social Cognition, 1, 110-125.
7. Dejong, W. (1979). An examination of self-perception mediation of the foot-in-the-door effect. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 37, 2221-2239.
8. Dillard, J.P. (1990). Self-inference and the foot-in-the-door technique quantity of behavior and attitudinal mediation. Human Communication Research, 16 (3), 422-447.
9. Dillard, J.P., Hunter, J. & Burgoon, M. (1984). Sequential-request persuasive strategies meta-analysis of foot-in-the-door and door-in-the-face. Human Communication Research, 10 (4), 461-488.
10. Fern, E., Monroe, K. & Avila, R. (1986). Effectiveness of multiple request strategies: A synthesis of research results. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 144-152.
11. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston: Row & Peterson.
12. Freedman, J. & Fraser, S. (1966). Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 195-202.
13. Harris, M.B. (1972). The effects of performing one altruistic act on the likehood of performing another. Journal of Social Psychology, 88, 65-73.
14. Joule, R.V (1987). Le pied-dans-la-porte: un paradigme à la recherche d'une théorie. Psychologie Française, 32(4), 301-306.
15. Joule, R.V. & Beauvois, J.L. (1998). La soumission librement consentie. Comment amener les gens à faire librement ce qu'ils doivent faire? Paris: PUF.
16. Joule, R.V. & Beauvois, J.L. (2002). Petit traité de manipulation à l'usage des honnêtes gens. Grenoble: PUG.
17. Kiesler, C.A. (1971). The psychology of commitment. Experiments liking behavior to belief. New-York: Academic Press.
18. Kiesler, C.A. (1977). Sequential events in commitment. Journal of Personality, 45, 65-78.
19. Kiesler, C.A. & Sakumura, J. (1966). A test of a model for commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 349-353.
20. Seligman, C., Bush, M. & Kirsh, K. (1976). Relationship between compliance in the foot-in-the-door paradigm and size of first request. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 517-520.
21. Shanab, M.E. & Isonio, S. (1982). The effects of contrast upon compliance with socially undesirable requests in the foot-in-the-door paradigm. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 20 (3), 180-182.
22. Zimbardo, P.G. (1969). The cognitive control of motivation. The consequences of choice and dissonance. Glenview: Scott & Foresman.
23. Zuckerman, M., Lazzarro, M.M. & Waldgeir, D. (1979). Undermining effects of the foot-in-the-door technique with extrinsic reward. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9, 292-296.