Quality assurance

Analysis of Pesticides in Food and Environmental Samples

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 125-149

  Ambrus, Árpád ^a  

^a CENTRAL VETERINARY INSTITUTE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873878498     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9781420007756     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. International Standard Organization, ISO=IEC 17025: 2005 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories, 2005.
2. OECD Series on Principles of good laboratory practice and compliance monitoring No. 1-11, OECD Environmental Directorate, Paris, 1998, http:==www.oecd.org=document= 63=0,2340, en_2649_34365_2346175_1_1_1_1,00.html
3. European Commission, Quality control procedures for pesticide residues analysis, Document No. SANCO=10232=2006, 2006.
4. Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR), Guidelines on good laboratory practice in residue analysis, CAC=GL 40-1993, Rev. 1-2003, 2003. www.codexalimentarius. net=download=report=655=al29_24e.pdf
5. EURACHEM=CITAC, Quality assurance for research and development and non-routine analysis, 1998.
6. EURACHEM=CITAC, Selection, use and interpretation of proficiency testing (PT) schemes by laboratories-2000, 2000.
7. EURACHEM=CITAC, Traceability in Chemical Measurement. A guide to achieving comparable results in chemical measurement, 2003.
8. King, B., Quality in the analytical laboratory, in 6th International Symposium on Quality Assurance and TQM for Analytical Laboratories, ed. Parkany, M., Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, 1995, pp. 8-18.
9. Miller, J.N. and Miller, J.C., Statistics and Chemometrics for Analytical Chemistry, 4th edn, Pearson Education Limited, Harrow, UK, 2000, chap. 1.
10. EURACHEM, EURACHEM=CITAC Guide Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurements, 2nd edn, 2000, http:==www.measurementuncertainty.org
11. International Standard Organisation, Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty of Measurement, 1995.
12. Ambrus, A., Reliability of measurement of pesticide residues in food, Accred. Qual. Assur., 9, 288, 2004.
13. Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR), Proposed draft guidelines on estimation of uncertainty of results, in Report of the 38th Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues, 2006, http:==www.codexalimentarius.net=web=archives.jsp?year1/406
14. Food and Agriculture Organisation, Portion of commodities to which codex maximum residue limits apply and which is analyzed, in Joint FAO=WHO Food Standards Programme Codex Alimentarius V. 2, Pesticide Residues in Food, 2nd edn, FAO, Rome, 1993, p. 391.
15. El-Bidaoui, M., et al., Testing the effect of sample processing and storage on stability of residues, in Principles and Practices of Method Validation, eds. Fajgelj, A. and Ambrus, A., Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, 2000, pp. 75.
16. Suszter, G., et al., Estimation of efficiency of processing soil samples, J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B, 41, 1, 2006.
17. Meier, P.C. and Zünd, R.E., Statistical Methods in Analytical Chemistry, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1993, chap. 2.
18. FA=WHO Pesticide Residues-Evaluations, http:==www.fao.org=AG=AGP=AGPP= Pesticid=
19. Thompson, M., et al., Harmonised guidelines for the use of recovery information in analytical measurement, Pure Appl. Chem., 71, 337, 1999.
20. Food and Agriculture Organisation, FAO, Manual on submission and evaluation of pesticide residue data for the estimation of maximum residue levels in food and feed, FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper 170, 2002.
21. Kateman, G. and Buydens, L., Quality Control in Analytical Chemistry, 2nd edn, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1993, chap. 2.
22. Codex Secretariat, Recommended method of sampling for the determination of pesticide residues for compliance with MRLs, CAC GL 33-1999. www.codexalimentarius. net=download=standards=361=CXG_033e.pdf
23. Ambrus, A. and Lantos, J., Evaluation of the studies on decline of pesticide residues, J. Agric. Food Chem., 50, 4846, 2002.
24. Ambrus, A. and Soboleva, E., Contribution of sampling to the variability of pesticide residue data, JAOAC Int., 87, 1368, 2004.
25. Ambrus, Á., Variability of pesticide residues in crop units, Pest Manag. Sci., 62, 693-714, 2006.
26. Hill, A.R.C. and Reynolds, S.L., Unit-to-unit variability of pesticides residues in fruit and vegetables, Food Addit. Contam., 19, 733, 2002.
27. Ambrus, A., Within and between field variability of residue data and sampling implications, Food Addit. Contam., 17(7), 519, 2000.
28. International Standard Organization, ISO 11648-1 Statistical aspects of sampling from bulk materials-Part 1: General principles, 2003.
29. Ambrus, Á., Solymosné, M.E., and Korsós, I., Estimation of uncertainty of sample preparation for the analysis of pesticide residues, J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B, 31, 443, 1996.
30. Maestroni, B., et al., Testing the efficiency and uncertainty of sample processing using 14C labelled chlorpyrifos-Part I, in Principles of Method Validation, eds. Fajgelj, A. and Ambrus, A., Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, 2000, p. 49.
31. Lyn, J.A., et al., Measurement uncertainty from physical sample preparation: estimation including systematic error, Analyst, 1391, 2003.
32. Wallace, D. and Kratochvil, B., Visman equations in the design of sampling plans for chemical analysis of segregated bulk materials, Anal. Chem., 59, 226, 1987.
33. Food and Agriculture Organization, Guidelines on pesticide residue trials to provide data for the registration of pesticides and the establishment of maximum residue limits-Part 1-Crops and Crop Products, 1986.
34. Hill, A.R.C., Harris, C.A., and Warburton, A.G., Effects of sample processing on pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables, in Principles and Practices of Method Validation, eds. Fajgelj, A. and Ambrus, A., Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, 2000, p. 41.
35. Fussell, R.J., et al., Assessment of the stability of pesticides during cryogenic sample processing. 1. Apples, J. Agric. Food Chem., 441, 2002.
36. Fajgelj, A. and Ambrus, A., eds., Principles and Practices of Method Validation, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, 2000.
37. Thompson, M., Recent trends in inter-laboratory precision at ppb and sub-ppb concentrations in relations to fitness for purpose criteria in proficiency testing, Analyst, 385, 2000.
38. Thompson, M. and Wood, R., The international harmonized protocol for the proficiency testing of (chemical) analytical laboratories, JAOAC Int., 926, 1993.
39. Thompson, M. and Wood, R., Harmonised guidelines for internal quality control in analytical chemistry laboratories, Pure Appl. Chem., 649, 1995.
40. FAPAS, Protocol for the organisation and analysis of data, 2002, http:==www.fapas. com=pdfpub=FAPASProtocol.pdf
41. Fernandez-Alba, A.R., CRL Proficiency Test 8, Pesticide residues in augberine homogenate, Final Report, 2006.
42. Thompson, M., Ellison, S.L.R., and Wood, R., International harmonised protocol for the proficiency testing of analytical laboratories, IUPAC Technical Report, Pure Appl. Chem., 145, 2006.
43. Fearn, T. and Thompson, M., A new test for ‘sufficient homogeneity’, Analyst, 1414, 2001.
44. Analytical Methods Committee, Robust statistics: a method of coping with outliers, Technical Brief No. 6, 2001, http:==www.rsc.org=pdf=amc=brief6.pdf