Validity and reliability of radiographic knee osteoarthritis measures by arthroplasty surgeons

Orthopedics

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Riddle, Daniel L ^a,b   Jiranek, William A ^b   Hull, Jason R ^b  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; KELLGREN LAWRENCE CLASSIFICATION; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS RESEARCH SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VALIDITY;

AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOPEDICS; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 84873868488     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20121217-14     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Cross WW III, Saleh KJ, Wilt TJ, Kane RL. Agreement about indications for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; (446):34-39.
2. NIH Consensus Panel. NIH Consensus Statement on total knee replacement December 8-10, 2003. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86(6):1328-1335.
3. Valdes AM, Doherty SA, Zhang W, Muir KR, Maciewicz RA, Doherty M. Inverse relationship between preoperative radiographic severity and postoperative pain in patients with osteoarthritis who have undergone total joint arthroplasty. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2012; 41(4): 568-575.
4. Cushnaghan J, Bennett J, Reading I, et al. Long-term outcome following total knee arthroplasty: a controlled longitudinal study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009; 68(5):642-647.
5. Trickett RW, Hodgson P, Forster MC, Robertson A. The reliability and accuracy of digital templating in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009; 91(7):903-906.
6. The B, Diercks RL, van Ooijen PM, van H Jr. Comparison of analog and digital preoperative planning in total hip and knee arthroplasties. A prospective study of 173 hips and 65 total knees. Acta Orthop. 2005; 76(1):78-84.
7. Hirschmann MT, Konala P, Amsler F, Iranpour F, Friederich NF, Cobb JP. The position and orientation of total knee replacement components: a comparison of conventional radiographs, transverse 2D-CT slices and 3D-CT reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011; 93(5):629-633.
8. Mehta VM, Paxton LW, Fornalski SX, Csintalan RP, Fithian DC. Reliability of the international knee documentation committee radiographic grading system. Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35(6):933-935.
9. Reichmann WM, Maillefert JF, Hunter DJ, Katz JN, Conaghan PG, Losina E. Responsiveness to change and reliability of measurement of radiographic joint space width in osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011; 19(5):550-556.
10. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957; 16(4):494-502.
11. Altman RD, Hochberg M, Murphy WA Jr, Wolfe F, Lequesne M. Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1995; 3(suppl A):3-70.
12. Altman RD, Gold GE. Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis, revised. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007; 15(suppl A):A1-A56.
13. Riddle DL, Jiranek WA, Neff RS, Whitaker D, Hull Jr. Extent of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis before knee arthroplasty: multicenter data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012; 470(10):2836-2842.
14. Lester G. Clinical research in OA - the NIH Osteoarthritis Initiative. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2008; 8(4):313-314.
15. Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
16. Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther. 2005; 85(3):257-268.
17. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33(1):159-174.
18. Kothari M, Guermazi A, von IG, et al. Fixed-flexion radiography of the knee provides reproducible joint space width measurements in osteoarthritis. Eur Radiol. 2004; 14(9):1568-1573.
19. Brandt KD, Mazzuca SA, Conrozier T, et al. Which is the best radiographic protocol for a clinical trial of a structure modifying drug in patients with knee osteoarthritis? J Rheumatol. 2002; 29(6):1308-1320.
20. Peterfy C, Li J, Zaim S, et al. Comparison of fixed-flexion positioning with fluoroscopic semi-flexed positioning for quantifying radiographic joint-space width in the knee: test-retest reproducibility. Skeletal Radiol. 2003; 32(3):128-132.
21. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957; 16(4):494-502.
22. Altman RD, Hochberg M, Murphy WA Jr, Wolfe F, Lequesne M. Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1995; 3(suppl A):3-70.
23. Felson DT. Central Reading of Knee X-rays for K-L Grade and Individual Radiographic Features of Knee OA. The Osteoarthritis Initiative Web site. http://oai.epi-ucsf.org/datarelease/default.asp. 2011. Published February 26, 2010. Accessed October 15, 2012.
24. Bagge E, Bjelle A, Valkenburg HA, Svanborg A. Prevalence of radiographic osteoarthritis in two elderly European populations. Rheumatol Int. 1992; 12(1):33-38.
25. Gossec L, Jordan JM, Mazzuca SA, et al. Comparative evaluation of three semi-quantitative radiographic grading techniques for knee osteoarthritis in terms of validity and reproducibility in 1759 X-rays: report of the OARSI-OMERACT task force. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008; 16(7):742-748.