The reliability and accuracy of digital templating in total knee replacement

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 91, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 903-906

  Trickett, R W ^a   Hodgson, P ^a   Forster, M C ^a   Robertson, A ^a  

^a LLANDOUGH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE PROSTHESIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL IMAGING; DIGITAL TEMPLATING; FEMUR; HUMAN; IMPLANT; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT PLANNING; X RAY FILM;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSTHESIS FITTING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 67650152609     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B7.21476     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Miller MD. Review of orthopaedics. Fourth ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2004.
2. Laskin RS. Controversies in total knee replacement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
3. Gonzalez MH, Mekhail AO. The failed total knee arthroplasty: evaluation and etiology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2004;12:436-446
4. Parratte S, Pagnano MW. Instability after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008;90-A:184-194
5. Heal J, Blewitt N. Kinemax total knee arthroplasty: trial by template. J Arthroplasty 2002;17:90-94 (Pubitemid 34098209)
6. The B, Diercks RL, van Ooijen PMA, van Horn JR. Comparison of analog and digital preoperative planning in total hip and knee arthroplasties: a prospective study of 173 hips and 65 total knees. Acta Orthop 2005;76:78-84.
7. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Second ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons 1981.
8. Howcroft DW, Fehily MJ, Peck C, et al. The role of preoperative templating in total knee arthroplasty: comparison of three prostheses. Knee 2006;13:427-429 (Pubitemid 44667503)
9. Chin KR, Dalury DF, Zurakowski D, Scott RD. Intraoperative measurements of male and female distal femurs during primary total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2002;15:213-217
10. Hitt K, Shurman JR 2nd, Greene K, et al. Anthropometric measurements of the human knee: correlation to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty systems. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003;85-A(Suppl 4):115-122
11. Conn KS, Clarke MT, Hallett JP. A simple guide to determine the magnification of radiographs and to improve the accuracy of preoperative templating. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2002;84-B:269-272 (Pubitemid 34257697)
12. Wimsey S, Pickard R, Shaw G. Accurate scaling of digital radiographs of the pelvis: a prospective trial of two methods. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006;88-B:1508-1512 (Pubitemid 44782135)
13. Kulkarni A, Partington P, Kelly D, Muller S. Disc calibration for digital templating in hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90-B:1623-1626
14. Oddy MJ, Jones MJ, Pendegrass CJ, Pilling JR, Wimhurst JA. Assessment of reproducibility and accuracy in templating hybrid total hip arthroplasty using digital radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006;88-B:581-585 (Pubitemid 43772938)
15. Dutton AQ, Yeo S-J, Yang K-Y, et al. Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008;90-A:2-9.
16. Pandit H, Aslam N, Pirpiris M, Jinnah R. Total knee arthroplasty: the future. J Surg Orthop Adv 2006;15:79-85.