Detection of prostate cancer by radio-frequency near-field spectroscopy in radical prostatectomy ex vivo specimens

Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 72-77

  Dotan, Z A ^a   Fridman, E ^a   Lindner, A ^b   Ramon, J ^a   Pode, D ^c   Bejar, J ^d   Kopolovic, J ^c   Pizov, G ^c   Sandbank, J ^b   Katz, R ^c   Shapiro, A ^c   Shilo, Y ^b   Nativ, O ^d  

^a SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^b ASSAF HAROFEH MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^c HADASSAH HEBREW UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^d BNAI ZION MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

radical prostatectomy; radio frequency near field spectroscopy; surgical margin

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SIZE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC EQUIPMENT; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DISEASE MARKER; EX VIVO STUDY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATE HYPERTROPHY; PROSTATECTOMY; RADIOFREQUENCY NEAR FIELD SPECTROSCOPY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REFERENCE VALUE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SENSOR; SPECTROSCOPY; TISSUE DIFFERENTIATION; TUMOR LOCALIZATION; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE; PROSTATE TUMOR; RADIOFREQUENCY RADIATION; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

AREA UNDER CURVE; HUMANS; MALE; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RADIO WAVES; ROC CURVE; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84873744097     PISSN: 13657852     EISSN: 14765608     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2012.34     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bianco Jr FJ, Scardino PT, Eastham JA. Radical prostatectomy: long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function ('trifecta'). Urology 2005; 66: 83-94. (Pubitemid 41356564)
2. Zincke H, Oesterling JE, Blute ML, Bergstralh EJ, Myers RP, Barrett DM. Long-term (15 years) results after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized (stage T2c or lower) prostate cancer. J Urol 1994; 152: 1850-1857. (Pubitemid 24322643)
3. Han M, Partin AW, Zahurak M, Piantadosi S, Epstein JI, Walsh PC. Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 2003; 169: 517-523. (Pubitemid 36132976)
4. Han M, Partin AW, Chan DY, Walsh PC. An evaluation of the decreasing incidence of positive surgical margins in a large retropubic prostatectomy series. J Urol 2004; 171: 23-26. (Pubitemid 37549081)
5. Karakiewicz PI, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Cagiannos I, Stricker PD, Klein E et al. Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer: multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients. Urology 2005; 66: 1245-1250. (Pubitemid 41797299)
6. Eastham JA, Kuroiwa K, Ohori M, Serio AM, Gorbonos A, Maru N et al. Prognostic significance of location of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. Urology 2007; 70: 965-969. (Pubitemid 350192610)
7. Badani KK, Kaul S, Menon M. Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 2766 procedures. Cancer 2007; 110: 1951-1958. (Pubitemid 350036853)
8. Kattan MW, Eastham JA, Stapleton AM, Wheeler TM, Scardino PT. A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998; 90: 766-771. (Pubitemid 28259189)
9. Eisenberg ML, Cowan JE, Davies BJ, Carroll PR, Shinohara K. The importance of tumor palpability and transrectal ultrasonographic appearance in the contemporary clinical staging of prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 2011; 29: 171-176.
10. Tal R, Valenzuela R, Aviv N, Parker M, Waters B, Flanigan RC et al. Persistent erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy: the association between nerve-sparing status and the prevalence and chronology of venous leak. J Sex Med 2009; 6: 2813-2819.
11. Marien T, Sankin A, Lepor H. Factors predicting preservation of erectile function in men undergoing open radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 2009; 181: 1817-1822.
12. Ward JF, Zincke H, Bergstralh EJ, Slezak JM, Myers RP, Blute ML. The impact of surgical approach (nerve bundle preservation versus wide local excision) on surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2004; 172: 1328-1332. (Pubitemid 39249708)
13. Rabbani F, Stapleton AM, Kattan MW, Wheeler TM, Scardino PT. Factors predicting recovery of erections after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2000; 164: 1929-1934.
14. Schlomm T, Tennstedt P, Huxhold C, Steuber T, Salomon G, Michl U et al. Neuro-vascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) increases nerve-sparing frequency and reduces positive surgical margins in open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience after 11 069 consecutive patients. Eur Urol 2012; 62: e31-e48.
15. Eichelberg C, Erbersdobler A, Haese A, Schlomm T, Chun FHK, Currlin E et al. Frozen section for the management of intraoperatively detected palpable tumor lesions during nerve-sparing scheduled radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2006; 49: 1011-1018. (Pubitemid 43674002)
16. Tsuboi T, Ohori M, Kuroiwa K, Reuter VE, Kattan MW, Eastham JA et al. Is intraoperative frozen section analysis an efficient way to reduce positive surgical margins? Urology 2005; 66: 1287-1291. (Pubitemid 41797306)
17. Dillenburg W, Poulakis V, Witzsch U, de Vries R, Skriapas K, Altmansberger HM et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the value of intraoperative frozen sections. Eur Urol 2005; 48: 614-621. (Pubitemid 41278587)
18. Goharderakhshan RZ, Sudilovsky D, Carroll LA, Grossfeld GD, Marn R, Carroll PR. Utility of intraoperative frozen section analysis of surgical margins in region of neurovascular bundles at radical prostatectomy. Urology 2002; 59: 709-714. (Pubitemid 34461982)
19. Lepor H, Kaci L. Role of intraoperative biopsies during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2004; 63: 499-502.
20. Foster KR, Schepps JL. Dielectric properties of tumor and normal tissues at radio through microwave frequencies. J Micro Power 1981; 16: 107-119.
21. Joines WT, Zhang Y, Li C, Jirtle RL. The measured electrical properties of normal and malignant human tissues from 50 to 900 MHz. Med Phys 1994; 21: 547-550. (Pubitemid 24129933)
22. Sha L, Ward ER, Stroy B. A review of dielectric properties of normal and malignant breast tissue. IEEE SoutheastCon 2002 457-462. (Pubitemid 34669463)
23. Pappo I, Spector R, Schindel A, Morgenstern S, Sandbank J, Leider LT et al. Diagnostic performance of a novel device for real-time margin assessment in lumpectomy specimens. J Surg Res 2010; 160: 277-281.
24. Karni T, Pappo I, Sandbank J, Lavon O, Kent V, Spector R et al. A device for realtime, intraoperative margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery. Am J Surg 2007; 194: 467-473. (Pubitemid 47361045)
25. Allweis TM, Kaufman Z, Lelcuk S, Pappo I, Karni T, Schneebaum S et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study of a real-time, intraoperative probe for positive margin detection in breast-conserving surgery. Am J Surg 2008; 196: 483.
26. Halter RJ, Schned A, Heaney J, Hartov A, Paulsen KD. Electrical impedance spectroscopy of prostatic tissues. IFMBE Proc 2007; 17: 126-129.
27. Salomon G, Hess T, Erbersdobler A, Eichelberg C, Greschner S, Sobchuk AN et al. The feasibility of prostate cancer detection by triple spectroscopy. Eur Urol 2009; 55: 376-384.
28. Sung MT, Cheng L. Contemporary approaches for processing and handling of radical prostatectomy specimens. Histol Histopathol 2010; 25: 259-265.
29. Bennett VS, Varma M, Bailey DM. Guidelines for the macroscopic processing of radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens. J Clin Pathol 2008; 61: 713-721. (Pubitemid 351859963)
30. Estrela da Silva JE, Marques de Sa JP, Jossinet J. Classification of breast tissue by electrical impedance spectroscopy. Med Biol Eng Comput 2000; 38: 26-30. (Pubitemid 30099305)