Patient's willingness to opt for external cephalic version

Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 15-21

  Vlemmix, Floortje ^a   Kuitert, Marjon ^b   Bais, Joke ^b   Opmeer, Brent ^c   Van Der Post, Joris ^a   Mol, Ben Willem ^a   Kok, Marjolein ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Northwest Clinics   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Breech presentation; External cephalic version; Patients' preference; Vignette study

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ELECTIVE SURGERY; EMERGENCY TREATMENT; EXTERNAL CEPHALIC VERSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; OBSTETRIC PROCEDURE; PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT COUNSELING; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT WILLINGNESS; VAGINAL DELIVERY; VIGNETTE;

ADULT; BREECH PRESENTATION; COUNSELING; DECISION MAKING; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PREGNANCY; VERSION, FETAL;

EID: 84873661035     PISSN: 0167482X     EISSN: 17438942     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/0167482X.2012.760540     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Hickok DE, Gordon DC, Milberg JA, et al. The frequency of breech presentation by gestational age at birth: a large population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:851-2
2. Evers AC, Brouwers HA, Hukkelhoven CW, et al. Perinatal mortality and severe morbidity in low and high risk term pregnancies in the Netherlands: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2010;341:c5639
3. Rietberg CC, Elferink-Stinkens PM, Visser GH. The effect of the Term Breech Trial on medical intervention behaviour and neonatal outcome in The Netherlands: an analysis of 35,453 term breech infants. BJOG 2005;112:205-9
4. Wilmink FA, Hukkelhoven CW, Lunshof S, et al. Neonatal outcome following elective cesarean section beyond 37 weeks of gestation: a 7-year retrospective analysis of a national registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:250-8
5. The Lancet. Caesarean section-the first cut isn't the deepest. Lancet 2010;375:956
6. Raynes-Greenow CH, Roberts CL, Barratt A, et al. Pregnant women's preferences and knowledge of term breech management, in an Australian setting. Midwifery 2004;20:181-7
7. Bewley S, Robson SC, Smith M, et al. The introduction of external cephalic version at term into routine clinical practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1993;52:89-93
8. Yogev Y, Horowitz E, Ben-Haroush A, et al. Changing attitudes toward mode of delivery and external cephalic version in breech presentations. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002;79:221-4
9. Bachmann LM, Muhleisen A, Bock A, et al. Vignette studies of medical choice and judgement to study caregivers' medical decision behaviour: systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008;8:50
10. Kok M, Van Der Steeg JW, Mol BW, et al. Which factors play a role in clinical decision-making in external cephalic version? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008;87:31-5
11. Watson V, Ryan M, Brown CT, et al. Eliciting preferences for drug treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 2004;172:2321-5
12. de Bekker-Grob EW, Essink-Bot ML, Meerding WJ, et al. Patients' preferences for osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete choice experiment. Osteoporos Int 2008;19:1029-37
13. Grootscholten K, Kok M, Oei SG, et al. External cephalic versionrelated risks: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:1143-51
14. Hofmeyr GJ. Interventions to help external cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002:CD000184
15. Jain S, Mulligama C, Tagwira V, et al. Labour outcome of women with successful external cephalic version: a prospective study. J Obstet Gynaecol 2010;30:13-16
16. Vezina Y, Bujold E, Varin J, et al. Cesarean delivery after successful external cephalic version of breech presentation at term: a comparative study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:763-8
17. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 2000;356:1375-83
18. Lipsitz SH. Generalized estimating equations for correlated binary data: using the odds ratio as a measure of association. Biometrika 1991;78:153-60
19. Rijnders M, Offerhaus P, van DP, et al. Prevalence, outcome, and women's experiences of external cephalic version in a low-risk population. Birth 2010;37:124-33
20. Kok M, Cnossen J, Gravendeel L, et al. Clinical factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;28:103-10
21. Kok M, Cnossen J, Gravendeel L, et al. Ultrasound factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:76-84
22. Kok M, Van Der Steeg JW, van der Post JA, Mol BW. Prediction of success of external cephalic version after 36 weeks. Am J Perinatol 2011;28:103-10
23. Kuppens SM, Hasaart TH, van der Donk MW, et al. Fewer caesarean sections for breech presentation following external cephalic version according to a protocol in a special office visit. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2008;152:1323-8.