Pregnant women's preferences and knowledge of term breech management, in an Australian setting

Midwifery

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 181-187

  Raynes Greenow, Camille H ^a,b   Roberts, Christine L ^a,b   Barratt, Alexandra ^c   Brodrick, Belinda ^b   Peat, Brian ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b ROYAL PRINCE ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^d WOMEN S AND CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ATTITUDE; AUSTRALIA; BOOK; BREECH EXTRACTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DELIVERY; FAMILY; FEMALE; FETUS; FRIEND; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MIDWIFE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PHYSICIAN; PREGNANCY; REVIEW; SAFETY; TEACHING HOSPITAL;

EID: 2642578184     PISSN: 02666138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2003.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Acien P. Breech presentation in Spain, 1992. a collaborative study European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology. 62:1995;19-24
2. Appuzzio J.J., Iffy L., Weiss G. Mode of delivery in breech presentation. Acta Obstetrica Gynaecologica Scandinavica. 81:2002;1091
3. Brown S., Lumley J. Satisfaction with care in labor and birth. a survey of 790 Australian women Birth. 21:1994;4-13
4. Chong E.S.Y., Mongelli M. Attitudes of Singapore women toward cesarean and vaginal deliveries. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 80:2003;189-194
5. Gamble J.A., Creedy D.K. Women's preference for a cesarean section. incidence and associated factors Birth. 28:2001;101-110
6. Graham W.J., Hundley V., McCheyne A.L., et al. An investigation of women's involvement in the decision to deliver by caesarean section. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 106:1999;213-220
7. Hannah M., Hannah W., Hewson S., et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term. a randomised multicentre trial Lancet. 356:2000;1375-1383
8. Hildingsson I., Radestad I., Rubertsson C., et al. Few women wish to be delivered by caesarean section. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 109:2002;618-623
9. Hofmeyr G. Effect of external cephalic version in late pregnancy on breech presentation and caesarean section rate. a controlled trial British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 90:1983;392-399
10. Hofmeyr, G.J., 2003. External cephalic version facilitation for breech presentation at term. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3. Oxford: Update Software.
11. Hutton E.K., Hannah M.E., Barratt J. Use of external cephalic version for breech pregnancy and mode of delivery for breech and twin pregnancy. a survey of Canadian practitioners Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada. 24:2002;804-810
12. Jonas O., Roder D. Breech presentation in south Australia, 1987-1989. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 33:1993;17-21
13. Keirse M.J.N.C. Evidence-based childbirth only for breech babies? Birth. 29:2002;55-59
14. Lau T., Lo K., Wan D., et al. Predictors of successful external cephalic version at term. a prospective study British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 104:1997;798-802
15. Leung T., Lau T., Lo K., et al. A survey of pregnant women's attitude towards breech delivery and external cephalic version. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 40:2000;253-259
16. Lumley J. Any room left for disagreement about assisting breech birth at term? Lancet. 356:2000;1368-1369
17. O'Connor A., Jacobson M., Stacy D. An evidence-based approach to managing women's decisional conflict. Journal of Obstetric, Gynaecology, and Neonatal Nursing. 31:2002;570-581
18. Paech M.J., Gurrin L.C. A survey of parturients using epidural analgesia during labour. Considerations relevant to antenatal educators. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 39:1999;21-25
19. Phipps H., Roberts C.L., Nassar N., et al. The management of breech presentation in Australia and New Zealand. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 43:2003;294-297
20. Roberts C.L., Peat B., Algert C.S., et al. Term breech birth in New South Wales, 1990-1997. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 40:2000;23-29
21. Roberts C.L., Nassar N., Raynes-Greenow C.H., et al. Update on the management of term breech deliveries in NSW, Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 43:2003;173
22. Turnbull D.A., Wilkinson C., Yaser A., et al. Women's role and satisfaction in the decision to have a caesarean section. Medical Journal of Australia. 170:1999;580-583
23. Walkinshaw S.A. Term breech trial. Birth. 30:2003;70
24. Yogev Y., Horowitz E., Ben-Haroush A., et al. Changing attitudes toward mode of delivery and external cephalic version in breech presentations. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 79:2002;221-224