Prediction of success of external cephalic version after 36 weeks

American Journal of Perinatology

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 103-109

  Kok, Marjolein ^a   Van Der Steeg, Jan Willem ^a   Van Der Post, Joris A M ^a   Mol, Ben W J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

breech; External cephalic version; prediction model; prognosis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMNION FLUID; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BREECH PRESENTATION; CALIBRATION; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; ETHNICITY; EXTERNAL CEPHALIC VERSION; FEMALE; FETUS; FETUS MOVEMENT; FETUS POSITION; FETUS WEIGHT; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; MULTIPARA; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; OBSTETRIC OPERATION; PARITY; PATIENT COUNSELING; PLACENTA; PLACENTA LOCALIZATION; PREDICTION; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC;

ADULT; AMNIOTIC FLUID; AREA UNDER CURVE; BREECH PRESENTATION; FEMALE; FETAL WEIGHT; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; PARITY; PLACENTA; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERSION, FETAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79551545973     PISSN: 07351631     EISSN: 10988785     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1262909     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Collaris R J., Oei S G. External cephalic version: a safe procedure? A systematic review of version-related risks. Ac (Pubitemid 38703542)
2. Hofmeyr G J., Kulier R. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000 2 CD000083
3. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Guidelines. External cephalic version and reducing the incidence of breech presentation. Green-top Guidelines No. 20a, 2008. Available at http://www.rcog.org.uk/files/rcog-corp/ uploaded-files/GT20aExternalCephalica2006.pdf
4. ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 340. Mode of term singleton breech delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006 108 235-237
5. Raynes-Greenow C H., Roberts C L., Barratt A, Brodrick B, Peat B. Pregnant women's preferences and knowledge of term breech management, in an Australian setting. Midwifery 2004 20 181-187 (Pubitemid 38726085)
6. Yogev Y, Horowitz E, Ben-Haroush A, Chen R, Kaplan B. Changing attitudes toward mode of delivery and external cephalic version in breech presentations. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002 79 221-224 (Pubitemid 35370047)
7. Leung T Y., Lau T K., Lo K W., Rogers M S. A survey of pregnant women's attitude towards breech delivery and external cephalic version. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2000 40 253-259
8. Bewley S, Robson S C., Smith M, Glover A, Spencer J A. The introduction of external cephalic version at term into routine clinical practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1993 52 89-93 (Pubitemid 24029818)
9. Caukwell S, Joels L A., Kyle P M., Mills M S. Women's attitudes towards management of breech presentation at term. J Obstet Gynaecol 2002 22 486-488 (Pubitemid 35222858)
10. Kok M, Cnossen J, Gravendeel L, van der Post J, Opmeer B, Mol B W. Clinical factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008 199 630.e1-630.e7 discussion e1-e5
11. Aisenbrey G A., Catanzarite V A., Nelson C. External cephalic version: predictors of success. Obstet Gynecol 1999 94 5 Pt 1 783-786 (Pubitemid 29484450)
12. Fortunato S J., Mercer L J., Guzick D S. External cephalic version with tocolysis: factors associated with success. Obstet Gynecol 1988 72 59-62
13. Lau T K., Lo K W., Wan D, Rogers M S. Predictors of successful external cephalic version at term: a prospective study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997 104 798-802 (Pubitemid 27319456)
14. Newman R B., Peacock B S., VanDorsten J P., Hunt H H. Predicting success of external cephalic version. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993 169 2 Pt 1 245-249 discussion 249-250
15. Kok M, Bais J M., van Lith J M. et al. Nifedipine as a uterine relaxant for external cephalic version: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2008 112 2 Pt 1 271-276
16. Hadlock F P., Harrist R B., Sharman R S., Deter R L., Park S K. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurementsa prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985 151 333-337 (Pubitemid 15237550)
17. Little R JA, Rublin D B. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York Wiley 1987
18. Schafer J L. Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. London Chapman & Hall 1997
19. Schafer J L., Graham J W. Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods 2002 7 147-177
20. Steyerberg E W., Eijkemans M J., Habbema J D. Stepwise selection in small data sets: a simulation study of bias in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1999 52 935-942 (Pubitemid 29486559)
21. Mol B W., van Wely M, Steyerberg E W. Using prognostic models in clinical infertility. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2000 3 199-202
22. Altman D G., Royston P. What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? Stat Med 2000 19 453-473 (Pubitemid 30126878)