Intelligent system design requirements for personalizing e-learning systems: Applications of AI to education

International Journal of Engineering Education

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1353-1359

  Al Hudhud, Ghada ^a  

^a KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Adaptive LMS; Blended learning; Interaction with e learning systems

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE INTERACTION; ADAPTIVE LMS; APPLICATIONS OF AI; BLENDED LEARNING; COGNITIVE SKILL; COOPERATIVE WORKS; DESIGN REQUIREMENTS; E-LEARNING SYSTEMS; FILLING IN; GROUP PROJECTS; INTELLIGENT LEARNING; KNOWLEDGE GAPS; LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; LEARNING PREFERENCES; LEARNING STYLE; LEARNING TECHNOLOGY; PEER TO PEER; PERSONALIZED LEARNING; QUANTITATIVE STUDY;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; E-LEARNING; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; TEACHING;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84873645666     PISSN: 0949149X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. G. Shaw, N. Marlow, The role of learner learning styles, gender, attitudes and perceptions on information and communication technology assisted, Computers & Education, 33(4), 1 December 1999, pp. 223-234.
2. Report and Recommendations for Education Policy Leaders from The Pearson Foundation/CCSSO International Conference on Teacher Quality and Learner Support September 2009.
3. A. I. Albarrak, H. A. Aboalsamh, M. Abouzahra, Evaluating Learning Management Systems for University Medical Education, Proceedings of Education and Management Technology, ICEMT 2010, 2-4 Nov. pp. 672-677, Cairo, IEEE.
4. S. Aslan, Y. Huh, D. Lee and C. M. Reigeluth, The Role of Personalized Integrated Educational Systems in the Information-Age Paradigm of Education, Contemporary Educational Technology, 2(2), 2011, pp. 95-117.
5. C. M. Reigeluth, W. R. Watson, S. L. Watson, P. Dutta, Z. Chen and N. D. P. Powell, Roles for technology in the information-age paradigm of education: Learning management systems, Educational Technology, 48(6), 2008, 32-39.
6. B. S. Bloom, The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring, Educational Researcher, 13, 1984, pp. 4-16.
7. J. R. Anderson, A. T. Corbett, K. R. Koedinger and R. Pelletier, Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 1995, pp. 167-207.
8. A. C. Graesser, K. VanLehn, C. P. Rose, P.W.Jordan and D. Harter, Intelligent tutoring systems with conversational dialogue, AI Magazine, 22, 2001, pp. 39-51.
9. R.Felder, Matters of style. Retrieved April 15, 2008 from: http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/ Papers/LS-Prism.htm, 1998.
10. S. D Lonn, Learners Use of a Learning Management System for Group Projects: A Case Study Investigating Interaction, Collaboration, and Knowledge Construction (2009). Doctoral dissertation, The University of Michigan, USA.
11. F. SerÓe, F. Alpaslan and L. Jain, Intelligent learning system for online learning, International Journal of Hybrid Intelligent, 5(3), August 2008, IOS Press Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
12. T. L. Clarke, A natural history of the mind: A guide for cognitive science, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16(4), 1993, pp. 754-755.
13. T. A. Koszalka and R. Ganesan, Designing online teachers: A taxonomy to guide strategic use of features available in teachers management systems (CMS) in distance education, Distance Education, 25(2), 2004, pp. 243-256.
14. L. N. Onyejegbu and V. E. Asor, An Efficient MODEL for Detecting LEARNING STYLE Preferences in a Personalized E-Learning Management System Cyber Journals: Multidisciplinary Journals in Science and Technology, Journal of Selected Areas in Software Engineering (JSSE), May Edition, 2011.
15. N. Stash, Incorporating Cognitive/Learning Styles in a General-Purpose Adaptive Hypermedia System. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands, 2007.
16. Sinem Aslan, Yeol Huh, Dabae Lee, The Role of Personalized Integrated Education Information-Age Paradigm of Education. Contemporary Eductional Technology, 2(2), 2011, pp. 95-117.
17. A. A. Mirza and M. Al-Abdulkareem, Models of e-learning adopted in the Middle East. Journal of Applied Computing and Informatics, Elsevier B.V., 9, 2011, pp. 83-93.
18. M. Parthasarathy, R. Ananthasayanam and R. Ravi, Intelligent Learning Management System: A Conceptual Framework: Computer. Indians Streams Research Journal, ISSN No: 2230-7850, Vol. I, Issue IV, May 2011.
19. A. T, Corbett and J. R. Anderson, LISP intelligent Tutoring System: Research in Skill Acquisition. In J. H. Larkin & R. W. Chabay (Eds.), Computer-Assisted Instruction and Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Shared Goals and Complementary Approaches (pp. 73-109). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 1992.
20. W.Sack, E. Soloway and P. Weingrad, Re-Writing Cartesian Learner Models. In J. E. Greer & G. I. McCalla (Eds.), Learner Modelling: The Key to Individualized Knowledge-Based Instruction (NATO ASI Series ed., 125, pp. 355-376). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1994.
21. P. Kirschner, J. Sweller and R. E. Clark, Why minimally guided learning does not work: An analysis of the failure of discovery learning, problem-based learning, experiential learning and inquiry-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 2006, pp. 75-86.