Observer study of a prototype clinical decision support system for breast cancer diagnosis using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 200, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 277-283

  Boroczky, Lilla ^a   Simpson, Mark ^a   Abe, Hiroyuki ^b   Drysdale, Jeremy ^a  

^a PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Clinical decision support; Diagnosis; Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER THERAPY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; JOB PERFORMANCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84873599110     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.8718     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:1295-1303
2. Akgül CB, Rubin DL, Napel S, Beaulieu CF, Greenspan H, Acar B. Content-based image retrieval in radiology: current status and future directions. J Digit Imaging 2011; 24:208-222
3. Müller H, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Caputo B, Syeda-Mahmood T, Wang F. Overview of the first workshop on medical content-based retrieval for clinical decision support at MICCAI 2009. Lecture Notes Comput Sci 2010; 5853:1-17
4. Müller H, Michoux N, Bandon D, Geissbuhler A. A review of content-based image retrieval systems in medical applications: clinical benefits and future directions. Int J Med Inform 2004; 73:1-23
5. Nilsson M, Sollenborn M. Advancements and trends in medical case-based reasoning: an overview of systems and system development. In Proceedings of the 17th International FLAIRS Conference, Special Track on Case-Based Reasoning. Miami Beach, FL: Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society, 2004:178-183
6. Shimauchi A, Giger ML, Bhooshan N, et al. Evaluation of clinical breast MR imaging performed with prototype computer-aided diagnosis breast MR imaging workstation: reader study. Radiology 2011; 258:696-704
7. Bilska-Wolak AO, Floyd CE Jr. Investigating different similarity measures for a case-based reasoning classifier to predict breast cancer. Proc SPIE 2001; 4322:1862-1866
8. Bilska-Wolak AO, Floyd CE, Nolte LW, Lo JY. Application of likelihood ratio to classification of mammographic masses: performance comparison to casebased reasoning. Med Phys 2003; 30:949-958
9. Floyd CE, Lo JY, Tourassi GD. Case-based reasoning computer algorithm that uses mammographic findings for breast biopsy decisions. AJR 2000; 175:1347-1352
10. Giger ML, Huo Z, Lan L, Vyborny CJ. Intelligent search workstation for computer-aided diagnosis. In Proceedings of Computer-Assisted Radiology and Surgery. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, 2000:822-827
11. Horsch K, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, Lan L, Mendelson EB, Hendrick RE. Classification of breast lesions with multimodality computer-aided diagnosis: observer study results on an independent clinical data set. Radiology 2006; 240:357-368
12. Markey MK, Lo JY, Tourassi GD, Floyd CE. Selforganizing map for cluster analysis of a breast cancer database. Artif Intell Med 2003; 27:113-127
13. Mazurowski MA, Zurada JK, Tourassi GD. Selection of examples in case-based computer-aided decision systems. Phys Med Biol 2008; 53:6079-6096
14. Giger ML. Clinical applications of computer-aided detection and diagnosis in mammography. In Proceedings of Decision Support in the Digital Medical Enterprise. Great Falls, VA: Society for Computer Applications in Radiology, 2005:87-91
15. Muramatsu C, Li Q, Schmidt RA, et al. Determination of subjective and objective similarity for pairs of masses on mammograms for selection of similar images. Proc SPIE 2007; 6514:1-9
16. Muramatsu C, Li Q, Schmidt RA, et al. Determination of subjective similarity for pairs of masses and pairs of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: comparison of similarity ranking scores and absolute similarity ratings. Med Phys 2007; 34:2890-2895
17. Nakayama R, Abe H, Shiraishi J, Doi K. Potential usefulness of similar images in the differential diagnosis of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. Radiology 2009; 253:625-631
18. El-Naqa I, Yang Y, Galatsanos NP, Nishikawa RM, Wernick MN. A similarity learning approach to content-based image retrieval: application to digital mammography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2004; 23:1233-1244
19. Nishikawa RM, Yang Y, Huo D, et al. Observers' ability to judge the similarity of clustered calcifications on mammograms. Proc SPIE 2004; 5372:192-198
20. Tourassi GD, Harrawood B, Singh S, Lo JY, Floyd CE. Evaluation of information-theoretic similarity measures for content-based retrieval and detection of masses in mammograms. Med Phys 2007; 34:140-150
21. Lessmann B, Nattkemper T, Huth J, et al. Content based image retrieval for dynamic time series data. In Proceedings of BVM. Berlin, Germany: Springer- Verlag, 2006:61-65
22. Simpson M, Boroczky L, Xu Y, Abe H, Krupinski E. A perceptual study in DCE-MRI for breast cancer. In Proceedings of MIPS XIV Conference. Dublin, Ireland: Medical Image Perception Society, 2011
23. Obuchowski NA. Multireader receiver operating characteristic studies: a comparison of study designs. Acad Radiol 1995; 2:709-716
24. The American College of Radiology BI-RADS Atlas and MQSA: Frequently Asked Questions. www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/PDF/QualitySafety/Resources/ BIRADS/BIRADSFAQS.pdf. Accessed October 25, 2012
25. Krupinski EA, Jiang Y. Anniversary paper: evaluation of medical imaging systems. Med Phys 2008; 35:645-659
26. DBM MRMC 2.2 B 3 software. Kurt Rossman Laboratories for Radiologic Image Research website. http://xray.bsd.uchicago.edu/krl/KRL-ROC/software-index6.htm. Accessed March 30, 2011
27. Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Metz CE. Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis: generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 1992; 27:723-731
28. Hillis SL, Berbaum KS, Metz CE. Recent developments in the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz procedure for multireader ROC study analysis. Acad Radiol 2008; 15:647-661
29. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000