Evaluation of clinical breast MR imaging performed with prototype computer-aided diagnosis breast MR imaging workstation: Reader study

Radiology

Volumn 258, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 696-704

  Shimauchi, Akiko ^a   Giger, Maryellen L ^a   Bhooshan, Neha ^a   Lan, Li ^a   Pesce, Lorenzo L ^a   Lee, John K ^a   Abe, Hiroyuki ^a   Newstead, Gillian M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DISEASE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGING SYSTEM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE;

EID: 79952286400     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10100409     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Lee SG, Orel SG, Woo IJ, et al. MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: preliminary results. Radiology 2003;226(3):773-778. (Pubitemid 36259154)
2. Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Tan LK. MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180(4):901-910. (Pubitemid 36363023)
3. Kuhl CK, Schmutzler RK, Leutner CC, et al. Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. Radiology 2000;215(1):267-279. (Pubitemid 30190541)
4. Sardanelli F, Podo F, D'Agnolo G, et al. Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT study): interim results. Radiology 2007;242(3):698-715.
5. Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA, et al. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology 2006;238(1):42-53. (Pubitemid 43010579)
6. Warren RM, Pointon L, Thompson D, et al. Reading protocol for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast: sensitivity and specificity analysis. Radiology 2005;236(3):779-788. (Pubitemid 41170838)
7. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Bick U, Bradley WG Jr, et al. International investigation of breast MRI: results of a multicentre study (11 sites) concerning diagnostic parameters for contrast-enhanced MRI based on 519 histopathologically correlated lesions. Eur Radiol 2001;11(4):531-546. (Pubitemid 32755488)
8. Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kinkel K, et al. Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13(6):889-895. (Pubitemid 32479947)
9. Giger ML. Computerized analysis of images in the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2004;25(5):411-418. (Pubitemid 39424004)
10. Vyborny CJ, Giger ML. Computer vision and artificial intelligence in mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162(3):699-708. (Pubitemid 24093581)
11. Vyborny CJ, Giger ML, Nishikawa RM. Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 2000;38(4):725-740. (Pubitemid 30640062)
12. Jiang Y, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, Metz CE, Giger ML, Doi K. Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis. Acad Radiol 1999;6(1):22-33. (Pubitemid 29061477)
13. Chan HP, Sahiner B, Helvie MA, et al. Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study. Radiology 1999;212(3):817-827. (Pubitemid 29410988)
14. Huo Z, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, Metz CE. Breast cancer: effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis observer study with independent database of mammograms. Radiology 2002;224(2):560-568. (Pubitemid 34809142)
15. Horsch K, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, Venta LA. Performance of computer-aided diagnosis in the interpretation of lesions on breast sonography. Acad Radiol 2004;11(3):272-280. (Pubitemid 38269465)
16. Horsch K, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, Lan L, Mendelson EB, Hendrick RE. Classification of breast lesions with multimodality computer-aided diagnosis: observer study results on an independent clinical data set. Radiology 2006;240(2):357-368. (Pubitemid 44098631)
17. Lehman CD, Peacock S, DeMartini WB, Chen X. A new automated software system to evaluate breast MR examinations: improved specificity without decreased sensitivity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187(1):51-56. (Pubitemid 46100145)
18. Williams TC, DeMartini WB, Partridge SC, Peacock S, Lehman CD. Breast MR imaging: computer-aided evaluation program for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. Radiology 2007;244(1):94-103. (Pubitemid 46981962)
19. Meeuwis C, van de Ven SM, Stapper G, et al. Computer-aided detection (CAD) for breast MRI: evaluation of efficacy at 3.0 T. Eur Radiol 2010;20(3):522-528.
20. Meinel LA, Stolpen AH, Berbaum KS, Fajardo LL, Reinhardt JM. Breast MRI lesion classification: improved performance of human readers with a backpropagation neural network computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25(1):89-95. (Pubitemid 46095203)
21. Chen W, Giger ML, Bick U, Newstead GM. Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI. Med Phys 2006;33(8):2878-2887. (Pubitemid 44154559)
22. Chen W, Giger ML, Lan L, Bick U. Computerized interpretation of breast MRI: investigation of enhancement-variance dynamics. Med Phys 2004;31(5):1076-1082. (Pubitemid 38656778)
23. Chen W, Giger ML, Li H, Bick U, Newstead GM. Volumetric texture analysis of breast lesions on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images. Magn Reson Med 2007;58(3):562-571. (Pubitemid 350154967)
24. Chen W. Computerized analysis and interpretation of breast MRI images [doctoral dissertation]. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago, 2007.
25. Gilhuijs KG, Giger ML, Bick U. Computerized analysis of breast lesions in three dimensions using dynamic magnetic-resonance imaging. Med Phys 1998;25(9):1647-1654. (Pubitemid 28430885)
26. Chen W, Giger ML, Bick U. A fuzzy c-means (FCM)-based approach for computerized segmentation of breast lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images. Acad Radiol 2006;13(1):63-72. (Pubitemid 43041894)
27. Metz C. Fundamental ROC analysis. In: Beutel J, Metter R, Kundel H, eds. Handbook of medical imaging. Vol 1. Bellingham, Wash: SPIE Press, 2000;751-764.
28. MRMC 2.1 B 2. software-index. Kurt Rossmann Laboratories for Radiologic Image Research Web site. http://xray.bsd.uchicago.edu/krl/KRL-ROC/software- index6.htm. Updated July 27, 2007. Accessed October 3, 2010.
29. ROCKIT software-index. Kurt Rossmann Laboratories for Radiologic Image Research Web site. http://xray.bsd.uchicago.edu/krl/KRL-ROC/software-index6.htm. Updated July 27, 2007. Accessed October 3, 2010.
30. Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Metz CE. Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis: generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 1992;27(9):723-731.
31. Hillis SL, Berbaum KS, Metz CE. Recent developments in the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz procedure for multireader ROC study analysis. Acad Radiol 2008;15(5):647-661. (Pubitemid 351515893)
32. Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 1979;6(2):65-70.
33. Kvam PH, Vdakovic B. Nonparametric statistics with applications to science and engineering. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience, 2007.
34. American College of Radiology. ACR practice guideline for the performance of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast. 2008 ACR practice guideline Web site. http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/ quality-safety/guidelines/breast/mri-breast.aspx. Accessed October 3, 2010.