Self-organizing map for cluster analysis of a breast cancer database

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 113-127

  Markey, Mia K ^a,b,c   Lo, Joseph Y ^a,b   Tourassi, Georgia D ^b   Floyd Jr , Carey E ^a,b  

^a Duke University   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Cluster analysis; Computer aided diagnosis; Self organizing map

Indexed keywords

CALCIFICATION (BIOCHEMISTRY); COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SELF ORGANIZING MAPS; TUMORS;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SYSTEM; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0037291502     PISSN: 09333657     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0933-3657(03)00003-4     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Baker J.A., Kornguth P.J., Lo J.Y., Williford M.E., Floyd C.E. Jr. Breast cancer: prediction with artificial neural network based on BI-RADS standardized lexicon. Radiology. 196:1995;817-822.
2. Bishop CM, Neural networks for pattern recognition. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
3. Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, Stone C, Classification and regression trees. Belmont: Wadsworth International Group; 1984.
4. Chen D., Chang R.F., Huang Y.L. Breast cancer diagnosis using self-organizing map for sonography. Ultrasound in Med. Biol. 26:2000;405-411.
5. Doi K., MacMahon H., Katsuragawa S., Nishikawa R.M., Jiang Y. Computer-aided diagnosis in radiology: potential and pitfalls. Eur. J. Radiol. 31:1999;97-109.
6. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ, An Introduction to the bootstrap. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall; 1993.
7. Floyd C.E. Jr., Lo J.Y., Tourassi G.D. Case-based reasoning computer algorithm that uses mammographic findings for breast biopsy decisions. Am. J. Roentgenol. 175:2000;1347-1352.
8. Giger M.L. Computer-aided diagnosis of breast lesions in medical images. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2:2000;39-45.
9. Heath M, Bowyer KW, Kopans D, Current status of the digital database for screening mammography. In: Karssemeijer N, Thijssen M, Hendriks JH, editors. Digital mammography. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1998. p. 457-60.
10. Hertz J, Anders K, Palmer RG, Introduction to the theory of neural computation. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley; 1991.
11. Huo Z., Giger M.L., Metz C.E. Effect of dominant features on neural network performance in the classification of mammographic lesions. Phys. Med. Biol. 44:1999;2579-2595.
12. Huo Z., Giger M.L., Vyborny C.J., Wolverton D.E., Metz C.E. Computerized classification of benign and malignant masses on digitized mammograms: a study of robustness. Acad. Radiol. 7:2000;1077-1084.
13. Kohonen T, Self-organizing maps. Berlin: Springer; 1995.
14. Li L., Zheng Y., Zheng L., Clark R.A. False-positive reduction in CAD mass detection using a competitive classification strategy. Med. Phys. 28:2001;250-258.
15. Lo J.Y., Baker J.A., Kornguth P.J., Floyd C.E. Jr. Effect of patient history data on the prediction of breast cancer from mammographic findings with artificial neural networks. Acad. Radiol. 6:1999;10-15.
16. Lo J.Y., Markey M.K., Baker J.A., Floyd C.E. Jr. Cross-institutional evaluation of BI-RADS predictive model for mammographic diagnosis of breast cancer. Am. J. Roentgenol. 178:2002;457-463.
17. Markey M.K., Lo J.Y., Floyd C.E. Jr. Differences between computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses and that of calcifications. Radiology. 223:2002;489-493.
18. Metz C.E. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Seminars in Nucl. Med. 8:1978;283-298.
19. Metz C.E. ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. Invest. Radiol. 21:1986;720-733.
20. Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADSTM). Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 1998.
21. Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL, Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition volume 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1986.
22. Rymon R., Zheng B., Chang Y.H., Gur D. Incorporation of a set enumeration trees-based classifier into a hybrid computer-assisted diagnosis scheme for mass detection. Acad. Radiol. 5:1998;181-187.
23. Schaller HN, Constraint satisfaction problems. In: Leondes CT, editor. Optimization techniques. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1998. p. 209-48.
24. Sharkey AJC, Combining artificial neural nets: ensemble and modular multi-net systems. London: Springer; 1999.
25. Tourassi G.D., Markey M.K., Lo J.Y., Floyd C.E. Jr. A neural network approach to breast cancer diagnosis as a constraint satisfaction problem. Med. Phys. 28:2001;804-811.
26. Vyborny C.J., Giger M.L., Nishikawa R.M. Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 38:2000;725-740.
27. West D., West V. Model selection for a medical diagnostic decision support system: a breast cancer detection case. Artif. Intell. Med. 20:2000;183-204.
28. Wu Y., Giger M.L., Doi K., Vyborny C.J., Schmidt R.A., Metz C.E. Artificial neural networks in mammography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiology. 187:1993;81-87.
29. Zheng B., Chang Y., Good W.F., Gur D. Performance gain computer-assisted detection schemes by averaging scores generated from artificial neural networks with adaptive filtering. Med. Phys. 28:2001;2302-2308.
30. Zheng B., Chang Y.H., Gur D. Adaptive computer-aided diagnosis scheme of digitized mammograms. Acad. Radiol. 3:1996;806-814.
31. Zheng B., Chang Y.H., Gur D. Mass detection in digitized mammograms using two independent computer-assisted diagnosis schemes. Am. J. Roentgenol. 167:1996;1421-1424.