Insights into post-transcriptional regulation during legume-rhizobia symbiosis

Plant Signaling and Behavior

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2013, Pages

  Reynoso, Mauricio Alberto ^a   Blanco, Flavio Antonio ^a   Zanetti, María Eugenia ^a  

^a FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS EXACTAS   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Legumes; miRNA; mRNA translation; NF YA; Nodulation; Transcription factors; Translating ribosome affinity purification

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); RHIZOBIACEAE;

MESSENGER RNA;

FABACEAE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETICS; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RHIZOBIUM; SYMBIOSIS;

FABACEAE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; RHIZOBIUM; RNA, MESSENGER; SYMBIOSIS;

EID: 84873549550     PISSN: 15592316     EISSN: 15592324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/psb.23102     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Mitra RM, Long SR. Plant and bacterial symbiotic mutants define three transcriptionally distinct stages in the development of the Medicago truncatula/ Sinorhizobium meliloti symbiosis. Plant Physiol 2004; 134:595-604; PMID:14739349; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.031518.
2. Lohar DP, Sharopova N, Endre G, Peñuela S, Samac D, Town C, et al. Transcript analysis of early nodulation events in Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol 2006; 140:221-34; PMID:16377745; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.105.070326.
3. Høgslund N, Radutoiu S, Krusell L, Voroshilova V, Hannah MA, Goffard N, et al. Dissection of symbiosis and organ development by integrated transcriptome analysis of lotus japonicus mutant and wild-type plants. PLoS One 2009; 4:e6556; PMID:19662091; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006556.
4. Libault M, Farmer A, Joshi T, Takahashi K, Langley RJ, Franklin LD, et al. An integrated transcriptome atlas of the crop model Glycine max, and its use in comparative analyses in plants. Plant J 2010; 63:86-99; PMID:20408999.
5. Maunoury N, Redondo-Nieto M, Bourcy M, Van de Velde W, Alunni B, Laporte P, et al. Differentiation of symbiotic cells and endosymbionts in Medicago truncatula nodulation are coupled to two transcriptomeswitches. PLoS One 2010; 5:e9519; PMID:20209049; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009519.
6. Moreau S, Verdenaud M, Ott T, Letort S, de Billy F, Niebel A, et al. Transcription reprogramming during root nodule development in Medicago truncatula. PLoS One 2011; 6:e16463; PMID:21304580; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016463.
7. Benedito VA, Torres-Jerez I, Murray JD, Andriankaja A, Allen S, Kakar K, et al. A gene expression atlas of the model legume Medicago truncatula. Plant J 2008; 55:504-13; PMID:18410479; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03519.x.
8. Reynoso MA, Blanco FA, Bailey-Serres J, Crespi M, Zanetti ME. Selective recruitment of mRNAs and miRNAs to polyribosomes in response to rhizobia infection in Medicago truncatula. Plant J 2012; In press; PMID:23050939; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12033.
9. van Hoof A, Wagner EJ. A brief survey of mRNA surveillance. Trends Biochem Sci 2011; 36:585-92; PMID:21903397; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2011.07.005.
10. Balagopal V, Parker R. Polysomes, P bodies and stress granules: states and fates of eukaryotic mRNAs. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2009; 21:403-8; PMID:19394210; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2009.03.005.
11. Brengues M, Teixeira D, Parker R. Movement of eukaryotic mRNAs between polysomes and cytoplasmic processing bodies. Science 2005; 310:486-9; PMID:16141371; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1115791.
12. Bhattacharyya SN, Habermacher R, Martine U, Closs EI, Filipowicz W. Stress-induced reversal of microRNA repression and mRNA P-body localization in human cells. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2006; 71:513-21; PMID:17381334; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/sqb.2006.71.038.
13. Xu J, Yang JY, Niu QW, Chua NH. Arabidopsis DCP2, DCP1, and VARICOSE form a decapping complex required for postembryonic development. Plant Cell 2006; 18:3386-98; PMID:17158604; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.106.047605.
14. Iwasaki S, Takeda A, Motose H, Watanabe Y. Characterization of Arabidopsis decapping proteins AtDCP1 and AtDCP2, which are essential for postembryonic development. FEBS Lett 2007; 581:2455-9; PMID:17485080; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2007.04.051.
15. Weber C, Nover L, Fauth M. Plant stress granules and mRNA processing bodies are distinct from heat stress granules. Plant J 2008; 56:517-30; PMID:18643965; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03623.x.
16. Xu J, Chua NH. Arabidopsis decapping 5 is required for mRNA decapping, P-body formation, and translational repression during postembryonic development. Plant Cell 2009; 21:3270-9; PMID:19855049; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.109.070078.
17. Bailey-Serres J, Sorenson R, Juntawong P. Getting the message across: cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein complexes. Trends Plant Sci 2009; 14:443-53; PMID:19616989; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2009.05.004.
18. Bailey-Serres J. Selective translation of cytoplasmic mRNAs in plants. Trends Plant Sci 1999; 4:142-8; PMID:10322548; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(99)01386-2.
19. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell 2009; 136:215-33; PMID:19167326; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.002.
20. Voinnet O. Origin, biogenesis, and activity of plant microRNAs. Cell 2009; 136:669-87; PMID:19239888; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.046.
21. Lanet E, Delannoy E, Sormani R, Floris M, Brodersen P, Crété P, et al. Biochemical evidence for translational repression by Arabidopsis microRNAs. Plant Cell 2009; 21:1762-8; PMID:19531599; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.108.063412.
22. Brodersen P, Sakvarelidze-Achard L, Bruun-Rasmussen M, Dunoyer P, Yamamoto YY, Sieburth L, et al. Widespread translational inhibition by plant miRNAs and siRNAs. Science 2008; 320:1185-90; PMID:18483398; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1159151.
23. Yang L, Wu G, Poethig RS. Mutations in the GW-repeat protein SUO reveal a developmental function for microRNA-mediated translational repression in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109:315-20; PMID:22184231; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114673109.
24. Nilsen TW. Mechanisms of microRNA-mediated gene regulation in animal cells. Trends Genet 2007; 23:243-9; PMID:17368621; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2007.02.011.
25. Gu S, Kay MA. How do miRNAs mediate translational repression? Silence 2010; 1:11; PMID:20459656; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-907X-1-11.
26. Jackson RJ, Hellen CU, Pestova TV. The mechanism of eukaryotic translation initiation and principles of its regulation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010; 11:113-27; PMID:20094052; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2838.
27. Tenenbaum SA, Lager PJ, Carson CC, Keene JD. Ribonomics: identifying mRNA subsets in mRNP complexes using antibodies to RNA-binding proteins and genomic arrays. Methods 2002; 26:191-8; PMID:12054896; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1046-2023(02)00022-1.
28. Tenenbaum SA, Carson CC, Lager PJ, Keene JD. Identifying mRNA subsets in messenger ribonucleoprotein complexes by using cDNA arrays. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97:14085-90; PMID:11121017; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.26.14085.
29. Roy PJ, Stuart JM, Lund J, Kim SK. Chromosomal clustering of muscle-expressed genes in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 2002; 418:975-9; PMID:12214599.
30. Kunitomo H, Uesugi H, Kohara Y, Iino Y. Identification of ciliated sensory neuron-expressed genes in Caenorhabditis elegans using targeted pulldown of poly(A) tails. Genome Biol 2005; 6:R17; PMID:15693946; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2005-6-2-r17.
31. Takayama J, Faumont S, Kunitomo H, Lockery SR, Iino Y. Single-cell transcriptional analysis of taste sensory neuron pair in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38:131-42; PMID:19875417; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp868.
32. Zanetti ME, Chang IF, Gong F, Galbraith DW, Bailey-Serres J. Immunopurification of polyribosomal complexes of Arabidopsis for global analysis of gene expression. Plant Physiol 2005; 138:624-35; PMID:15955926; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.105.059477.
33. Halbeisen RE, Gerber AP. Stress-dependent coordination of transcriptome and translatome in yeast. PLoS Biol 2009; 7:e1000105; PMID:19419242; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000105.
34. Heiman M, Schaefer A, Gong S, Peterson JD, Day M, Ramsey KE, et al. A translational profiling approach for the molecular characterization of CNS cell types. Cell 2008; 135:738-48; PMID:19013281; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.028.
35. Doyle JP, Dougherty JD, Heiman M, Schmidt EF, Stevens TR, Ma G, et al. Application of a translational profiling approach for the comparative analysis of CNS cell types. Cell 2008; 135:749-62; PMID:19013282; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.029.
36. Branco-Price C, Kaiser KA, Jang CJ, Larive CK, Bailey-Serres J. Selective mRNA translation coordinates energetic and metabolic adjustments to cellular oxygen deprivation and reoxygenation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 2008; 56:743-55; PMID:18665916; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03642.x.
37. Mustroph A, Zanetti ME, Jang CJ, Holtan HE, Repetti PP, Galbraith DW, et al. Profiling translatomes of discrete cell populations resolves altered cellular priorities during hypoxia in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:18843-8; PMID:19843695; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906131106.
38. Jiao Y, Meyerowitz EM. Cell-type specific analysis of translating RNAs in developing flowers reveals new levels of control. Mol Syst Biol 2010; 6:419; PMID:20924354; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2010.76.
39. Juntawong P, Bailey-Serres J. Dynamic light regulation of translation status in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front Plant Sci 2012; 3:66; PMID:22645595; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2012.00066.
40. Liu MJ, Wu SH, Chen HM, Wu SH. Widespread translational control contributes to the regulation of Arabidopsis photomorphogenesis. Mol Syst Biol 2012; 8:566; PMID:22252389; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2011.97.
41. Oldroyd GE, Downie JA. Coordinating nodule morphogenesis with rhizobial infection in legumes. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2008; 59:519-46; PMID:18444906; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092839.
42. Oldroyd GE, Murray JD, Poole PS, Downie JA. The rules of engagement in the legume-rhizobial symbiosis. Annu Rev Genet 2011; 45:119-44; PMID:21838550; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurevgenet-110410-132549.
43. Limpens E, Franken C, Smit P, Willemse J, Bisseling T, Geurts R. LysM domain receptor kinases regulating rhizobial Nod factor-induced infection. Science 2003; 302:630-3; PMID:12947035; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1090074.
44. Arrighi JF, Barre A, Ben Amor B, Bersoult A, Soriano LC, Mirabella R, et al. The Medicago truncatula lysin [corrected] motif-receptor-like kinase gene family includes NFP and new nodule-expressed genes. Plant Physiol 2006; 142:265-79; PMID:16844829; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.084657.
45. Endre G, Kereszt A, Kevei Z, Mihacea S, Kaló P, Kiss GB. A receptor kinase gene regulating symbiotic nodule development. Nature 2002; 417:962-6; PMID:12087406; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature00842.
46. Ané JM, Kiss GB, Riely BK, Penmetsa RV, Oldroyd GE, Ayax C, et al. Medicago truncatula DMI1 required for bacterial and fungal symbioses in legumes. Science 2004; 303:1364-7; PMID:14963334; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1092986.
47. Kanamori N, Madsen LH, Radutoiu S, Frantescu M, Quistgaard EM, Miwa H, et al. A nucleoporin is required for induction of Ca2+ spiking in legume nodule development and essential for rhizobial and fungal symbiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103:359-64; PMID:16407163; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0508883103.
48. Saito K, Yoshikawa M, Yano K, Miwa H, Uchida H, Asamizu E, et al. NUCLEOPORIN85 is required for calcium spiking, fungal and bacterial symbioses, and seed production in Lotus japonicus. Plant Cell 2007; 19:610-24; PMID:17307929; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.106.046938.
49. Groth M, Takeda N, Perry J, Uchida H, Dräxl S, Brachmann A, et al. NENA, a Lotus japonicus homolog of Sec13, is required for rhizodermal infection by arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi and rhizobia but dispensable for cortical endosymbiotic development. Plant Cell 2010; 22:2509-26; PMID:20675572; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.109.069807.
50. Lévy J, Bres C, Geurts R, Chalhoub B, Kulikova O, Duc G, et al. A putative Ca2+ and calmodulin-dependent protein kinase required for bacterial and fungal symbioses. Science 2004; 303:1361-4; PMID:14963335; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1093038.
51. Messinese E, Mun J-H, Yeun LH, Jayaraman D, Rougé P, Barre A, et al. A novel nuclear protein interacts with the symbiotic DMI3 calcium-and calmodulin-dependent protein kinase of Medicago truncatula. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2007; 20:912-21; PMID:17722695; http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-20-8-0912.
52. Hirsch S, Kim J, Muñoz A, Heckmann AB, Downie JA, Oldroyd GED. GRAS proteins form a DNA binding complex to induce gene expression during nodulation signaling in Medicago truncatula. Plant Cell 2009; 21:545-57; PMID:19252081; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.108.064501.
53. Cerri MR, Frances L, Laloum T, Auriac MC, Niebel A, Oldroyd GE, et al. Medicago truncatula ERN transcription factors: regulatory interplay with NSP1/NSP2 GRAS factors and expression dynamics throughout rhizobial infection. Plant Physiol 2012; 160:2155-72; PMID:23077241; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.203190.
54. Laloum T, De Mita S, Gamas P, Baudin M, Niebel A. CCAAT-box binding transcription factors in plants: Y so many? Trends Plant Sci 2012; In press; PMID:22939172; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.07.004.
55. Gonzalez-Rizzo S, Crespi M, Frugier F. The Medicago truncatula CRE1 cytokinin receptor regulates lateral root development and early symbiotic interaction with Sinorhizobium meliloti. Plant Cell 2006; 18:2680-93; PMID:17028204; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.106.043778.
56. Zanetti ME, Blanco FA, Beker MP, Battaglia M, Aguilar OMA. A C subunit of the plant nuclear factor NF-Y required for rhizobial infection and nodule development affects partner selection in the common bean-Rhizobium etli symbiosis. Plant Cell 2010; 22:4142-57; PMID:21139064; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.110.079137.
57. Klaus-Heisen D, Nurisso A, Pietraszewska-Bogiel A, Mbengue M, Camut S, Timmers T, et al. Structurefunction similarities between a plant receptor-like kinase and the human interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase-4. J Biol Chem 2011; 286:11202-10; PMID:21205819; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.186171.
58. Boualem A, Laporte P, Jovanovic M, Laffont C, Plet J, Combier J-P, et al. MicroRNA166 controls root and nodule development in Medicago truncatula. Plant J 2008; 54:876-87; PMID:18298674; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03448.x.
59. Combier JP, Frugier F, de Billy F, Boualem A, El-Yahyaoui F, Moreau S, et al. MtHAP2-1 is a key transcriptional regulator of symbiotic nodule development regulated by microRNA169 in Medicago truncatula. Genes Dev 2006; 20:3084-8; PMID:17114582; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.402806.
60. El Yahyaoui F, Küster H, Ben Amor B, Hohnjec N, Pühler A, Becker A, et al. Expression profiling in Medicago truncatula identifies more than 750 genes differentially expressed during nodulation, including many potential regulators of the symbiotic program. Plant Physiol 2004; 136:3159-76; PMID:15466239; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.043612.
61. Combier JP, de Billy F, Gamas P, Niebel A, Rivas S. Trans-regulation of the expression of the transcription factor MtHAP2-1 by a uORF controls root nodule development. Genes Dev 2008; 22:1549-59; PMID:18519645; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.461808.
62. Bailey-Serres J. Microgenomics: genome-scale cellspecific monitoring of multi-tiers of gene regulation. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2013; 64: In press.