Effects of various cryoprotectants on bull sperm quality, DNA integrity and oxidative stress parameters

Cryobiology

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 38-42

  Taşdemir, Umut ^a   Büyükleblebici, Serhat ^b   Tuncer, Pürhan Barbaros ^a   Coşkun, Erdem ^c   Özgürtaş, Taner ^d   Aydin, Fevzi Nuri ^d   Büyükleblebici, Olga ^b   Gürcan, Ismail Safa ^e  

^a Livestock Central Research Institute   (Turkey)

^b AKSARAY UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^d GULHANE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

^e ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Bull sperm quality; Cryopreservation; Dimethyl sulfoxide; Ethylene glycol; Glycerol

Indexed keywords

CATALASE; CRYOPROTECTIVE AGENT; DIMETHYL SULFOXIDE; ETHYLENE GLYCOL; GLUTATHIONE; GLUTATHIONE PEROXIDASE; GLYCEROL; LIQUID NITROGEN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; BULL (BOVINE); CELL MEMBRANE; COMET ASSAY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); COOLING; CRYOPRESERVATION; DILUTION; DNA DAMAGE; DNA STRUCTURE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FREEZE THAWING; HYPOOSMOTIC STRESS; MALE; MALE GENITAL TRACT PARAMETERS; MEMBRANE STRUCTURE; NONHUMAN; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SEMEN VOLUME; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY; SPERM; SPERMATOZOON; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY; STANDARDIZATION; STRAW;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; CRYOPRESERVATION; CRYOPROTECTIVE AGENTS; DIMETHYL SULFOXIDE; DNA; ETHYLENE GLYCOL; GLYCEROL; MALE; OXIDATIVE STRESS; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SEMEN PRESERVATION; SPERMATOZOA;

EID: 84873526105     PISSN: 00112240     EISSN: 10902392     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2012.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Aitken R.J. Free radicals, lipid peroxidation and sperm function. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 1995, 659-668.
2. Aki{dotless}n A.O., Cedden F. Eastern Anatolian Red Cattle (Turkey). Brachycerous Cattle in Balkan Countries and Their Perspectives 2008, 44-46. ERFP, Domzale. D. Compan, A. Cividini (Eds.).
3. Alvarez J.G., Storey B.T. Evidence for increased lipid peroxidation damage and loss of superoxide dismutase activity as a mode of sublethal cryodamage to human sperm during cryopreservation. J. Androl. 1992, 13:232-241.
4. Aman R., Pickett B. Principles of cryopreservation and a review of stallion spermatozoa. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 1987, 7:145-173.
5. Anzar M., He L., Buhr M.M., Kroetsch T.G., Pauls K.P. Sperm apoptosis in fresh and cryopreserved bull semen detected by flow cytometry and its relationship with fertility. Biol. Reprod. 2002, 66:354-360.
6. Awad M.M. Effect of some permeating cryoprotectants on CASA motility results in cryopreserved bull spermatozoa. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2011, 123:157-162.
7. Ball B.A., Vo A. Osmotic tolerance of equine spermatozoa and the effects of soluble cryoprotectants on equine sperm motility, viability and mitochondrial membrane potential. J. Androl. 2001, 22:1061-1069.
8. Bilodeau J.F., Chatterjee S., Sirard M.A., Gagnon C. Levels of antioxidant defenses are decreased in bovine spermatozoa after a cycle of freezing and thawing. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2000, 55:282-288.
9. Bochenek M., Smorag Z., Pilch J. Sperm chromatin structure assay of bulls qualified for artificial insemination. Theriogenology 2001, 56:557-567.
10. Celeghini E.C.C., Arruda R.P., Andrade A.F.C., Nascimento J., Raphael C.F., Rodrigues P.H.M. Effects that bovine sperm cryopreservation using two different extenders has on sperm membranes and chromatin. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2008, 104:119-131.
11. Cormier N., Sirard M.A., Bailey J.L. Premature capacitation of bovine spermatozoa is initiated by cryopreservation. J. Androl. 1996, 18:461-468.
12. Correa J.R., Zavos P.M. The hypoosmotic swelling test: its employment as an assay to valuate he functional integrity of the frozen-thawed bovine sperm membrane. Theriogenology 1994, 42:351-360.
13. Cremades T., Roca J., Rodriguez-Martinez H., Abaigar T., Vazquez J.M., Martinez E.A. Kinematic changes during the cryopreservation of boar spermatozoa. J. Androl. 2005, 26:610-618.
14. Curry M.R., Millar J.D., Watson P.F. Calculated optimal cooling rates for ram and human sperm cryopreservation fail to conform with empirical observations. Biol. Reprod. 1994, 51:1014-1021.
15. Davis R.O., Drobnis E.Z., Overstreet J.W. Application of multivariate cluster, discriminate function and stepwise regression analysis to variable selection and predictive modeling of sperm cryosurvival. Fertil. Steril. 1995, 63:1051-1057.
16. De Leeuw F.E., De Leeuw A.M., Den Daas J.H.G., Colenbrander B., Verkleij A.J. Effects of various cryoprotective agents and membrane stabilizing compounds on bull sperm membrane integrity after cooling and freezing. Cryobiology 1995, 30:32-44.
17. El-Harairy M.A., Eid Laila N., Zeidan A.E.B., Abd El-Salaam A.M., El-Kishk M.A.M. Quality and fertility of the frozen-thawed bull semen as affected by the different cryoprotectants and glutathione levels. J. Am. Sci. 2010, 7:791-801.
18. Freitas C.P., Dellaqua J.A., Papa F.O., Alvarenga M.A., Cresphilo A.M., Landim-Alvarange F.C. The effect of Tris and Botu-Bov for bovine sexed sperm cryopreservation. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2008, 22:436-440.
19. Garner D. Artificial insemination. Reprod. Dom. Anim. 1991, 251-278. Academic Press, San Diego. P.T. Cupps (Ed.).
20. Gilmore J.A., Liu J., Peter A.T., Critser J.K. Determination of plasma membrane characteristics of boar spermatozoa and their relevance to cryopreservation. Biol. Reprod. 1998, 58:28-36.
21. Guthrie H.D., Liu J., Critser J.K. Osmotic tolerance limits and effects of cryoprotectants on motility of bovine spermatozoa. Biol. Reprod. 2002, 67:1811-1816.
22. Hammadeh M.E., Greiner S., Rosenbaum P., Schmidt W. Comparison between human sperm preservation medium and TEST-yolk buffer on protecting chromatin and morphology integrity of human spermatozoa in fertile and subfertile men after freeze-thawing procedure. J. Androl. 2001, 22:1012-1018.
23. Januskauskas A., Johannisson A., Rodriguez-Martinez H. Assessment of sperm quality through fluorometry and sperm chromatin structure assay in relation to field fertility of frozen thawed semen from Swedish AI bulls. Theriogenology 2001, 55:947-961.
24. Januskauskas A., Johannisson A., Rodriguez-Martinez H. Subtle membrane changes in cryopreserved bull semen in relation with sperm viability, chromatin structure and field fertility. Theriogenology 2003, 60:743-758.
25. A. Lemma, Effect of cryopreservation on sperm quality and fertility, in: M. Manafi (Ed.), Artificial insemination in farm, animals, In tech, vol. 12, 2010, pp. 191-216.
26. Lovelock J.E., Bishop M.W. Prevention of freezing damage to living cells by dimethylsulphoxide. Nature 1959, 183:1394-1395.
27. Mantovani R., Rota A., Falomo M.E., Bailoni L., Vincenti L. Comparison between glycerol and ethylene glycol for the cryopreservation of equine spermatozoa: semen quality assessment with standard analyses and with the hypoosmotic swelling test. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 2002, 42:217-226.
28. Martins-Bessa A., Rocha A., Mayenco-Aguirre A. Comparing ethylene glycol with glycerol for cryopreservation of canine semen in egg-yolk TRIS extenders. Theriogenology 2006, 66:2047-2055.
29. Mazur P. Freezing of living cells: mechanisms and implications. Am. J. Physiol. 1984, 247:125-142.
30. Meyers S.A. Spermatozoal response to osmotic stress. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2005, 89:57-64.
31. Moce E., Vicente J.S. Rabbit sperm cryopreservation. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2009, 110:1-24.
32. Molinia F.C., Evans G., Maxwell W.M.C. Incorporating of penetrating cryoprotectants in diluents for pellet-freezing ram spermatozoa. Theriogenology 1994, 42:849-858.
33. Moore A.I., Squires E.L., Bruemmer J.E., Graham J.K. Effect of cooling rate and cryoprotectant on the cryosurvival of equine spermatozoa. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2006, 26:215-218.
34. Muino R., Tamargo C., Hidalgo C.O., Pena A.I. Identification of sperm subpopulations with defined motility characteristics in ejaculates from Holstein bulls: effects of cryopreservation and between-bull variation. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2008, 109:27-39.
35. Nunez-Martinez I., Moran J.M., Pena F.J. A three-step statistical procedure to identify sperm kinematic subpopulations in canine ejaculates: changes after cryopreservation. Reprod. Dom. Anim. 2006, 41:408-415.
36. Peris S.I., Morrier A., Dufour M., Bailey J.L. Cryopreservation of ram semen facilitates sperm DNA damage relationship between sperm andrological parameters and the sperm chromatin structure assay. J. Androl. 2004, 25:224-233.
37. Polge C., Rowson L.E.A. Results with bull semen stored at -79°C. Vet. Rec. 1952, 64:851-853.
38. Polge C., Smith A.U., Parkes A.S. Revival of spermatozoa after vitrification and dehydration at low temperatures. Nature 1949, 164:666.
39. Quintero-Moreno A., Miro J., Rigau A.T., Rodriguez-Gil J.E. Identification sperm subpopulations with specific motility characteristics in stallion ejaculates. Theriogenology 2003, 59:1973-1990.
40. Revel S.G., Mrode R.A. An osmotic resistance test for bovine semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 1994, 36:77-86.
41. Rohilla R.K., Tuli R.K., Goyal R.L. Comparative study of the effects of cryoprotective agents in freezing Murrah buffalo bull semen. Indian J. Vet. Res. 2005, 14:37-43.
42. Schafer S., Holzman A. The use of transmigration and spermac stain to evaluate epididymal cat spermatozoa. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2000, 59:201-211.
43. Shannon P., Curson B. Kinetics of aromatic l-amino acid oxidase and the effect of catalase on fertility of diluted bovine semen stored at 5°C and ambient temperatures. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1982, 64:463-467.
44. Singh M., Matharoo J.S., Chauhan F.S. Preliminary fertility results with frozen buffalo bull semen using tris extender. Theriogenology 1980, 13:191-194.
45. A.A. Swelum, H.A. Mansour, A.A. Elsayed, H.A. Amer, Comparing ethylene glycol with glycerol for cryopreservation of buffalo bull semen in egg-yolk containing extenders, Theriogenology (2011). doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology .2011.04.015.
46. Verstegen J., Iguer-Ouada M., Onclin K. Computer assisted semen analyzers in andrology research and veterinary practice. Theriogenology 2002, 57:149-179.
47. Watson P.F. The causes of reduced fertility with cryopreserved semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2000, 60:481-492.
48. Watson R.C., Stewart D.L. The effects of cooling to 5°C and freezing and thawing on the ultrastructure of bull spermatozoa. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1979, 56:233-238.
49. Willoughby C.E., Mazur P., Peter A.T., Critser J.K. Osmotic tolerance limits and properties of murine spermatozoa. Biol. Reprod. 1996, 55:715-727.
50. Woelders H., Mathiijs A., Engel B. Effects of trehalose, and sucrose, osmolality of the freezing medium, and cooling rate on viability and intactness of bull sperm after freezing and thawing. Cryobiology 1997, 35:93-105.
51. Zeidan A.E.B., Abulnaga A.I., Ibrahim Z.A., Hamedi M.A.M. Quality, enzymatic activity and fertility rate of the cooled rabbit semen supplemented with caffeine. Egypt J. Rabbit. Sci. 2002, 12:27.