Effect of some permeating cryoprotectants on CASA motility results in cryopreserved bull spermatozoa

Animal Reproduction Science

Volumn 123, Issue 3-4, 2011, Pages 157-162

  Awad, M M ^a  

^a University of Suez Canal   (Egypt)

Author keywords

Bull; Cryopreservation; Cryoprotectant; Spermatozoa

Indexed keywords

CRYOPROTECTIVE AGENT; ETHYLENE GLYCOL; METHANOL;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CELL MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; CRYOPRESERVATION; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFECT; EVALUATION; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERM PRESERVATION; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; CELL MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; CRYOPRESERVATION; CRYOPROTECTIVE AGENTS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; ETHYLENE GLYCOL; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; METHANOL; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SEMEN PRESERVATION; SPERM MOTILITY;

MAMMALIA;

EID: 79951679555     PISSN: 03784320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2011.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Alberto C., Claudio V., Massimo F., Laura W., Augusto C. Effect of semen preparation on casa motility results in cryopreserved bull spermatozoa. Theriogenology 2010, 74:424-435.
2. Alvarez J.G., Storey B.T. Evidence that membrane stress contributes more than lipid peroxidation to sub lethal cry damage in cryopreserved human sperm: glycerol and other polios as sole cryoprotectant. J. Androl. 1993, 14:199-204. 209.
3. Amann R.P. Can the fertility potential of a seminal sample be predicted accurately?. J. Androl. 1989, 10:89-98.
4. Amann R.P., Pickett B.W. Principles of cryopreservation and a review of cryopreservation of stallion spermatozoa. Equine Vet. Sci. 1987, 7:145-173.
5. Martins-Bessa A., Mayenco-Aguirre A., Rocha A. Comparing ethylene glycol with glycerol for cryopreservation of canine semen in egg-yolk TRIS extenders. Theriogenology 2006, 66:2047-2055.
6. Auger J., Leonce S., Jouannet P., Ronot X. Flow cytometric sorting of living, highly motile human spermatozoa based on evaluation of their mitochondrial activity. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1993, 41:1247-1251.
7. Awad M.M., Graham J.K. Computerized motion analysis of bull spermatozoa cryopreserved in the presence of non-permeating and permeating cryoprotectants. Agric. Res. J. 2002, 1:85-90.
8. Awad M.M., Graham J.K. A new pellet technique for cryopreserving ram and bull spermatozoa using the cold surface of cattle fat. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2004, 84:83-92.
9. Budworth P.R., Amann R.P., Chapman P.L. Relationships between computerized measurements of motion of frozen thawed bull spermatozoa and fertility. J. Androl. 1988, 9:41-54.
10. Cavalcanti M.C.O., Moura C.S., Guerra M.M.P., Silva S.V. Acc, ao crioprotectora do glicerol e etileno glicol no congelamento do semendecao. Rev. Bras. Reprod. Anim. 2002, 26:174-176. [in Portuguese with English abstract].
11. Celeghini E.C.C., Arruda R.P., Andrade A.F.C., Nascimento J., Raphael C.F., Rodrigues P.H.M. Effects that bovine sperm cryopreservation using two different extenders has on sperm membranes and chromatin. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2008, 104:119-131.
12. Coetzee K., Kruger T.F., Lombard C.J. Repeatability and variance analysis on multiple computer-assisted (IVOS) sperm morphology readings. Andrologia 1999, 31:163-168.
13. Cseh S., Polichronopoulos T., Solti L. Prediction of bull fertility by computer-assisted semen analysis. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2004, 16:128-129. (abstract).
14. Czlonkowska M., Papis K., Guszkiewicz A., Kossakowski M., Eysymont U. Freezing of sheep embryos in 30M methanol. Cryoletters 1991, 12:11-16.
15. Davis R.O., Katz D.F. Operational standards for CAS instruments. J. Androl. 1993, 14:385-394.
16. Davis R.O., Rothmann S.A., Overstreet J.W. Accuracy and precision of computer-aided sperm analysis in multicenter studies. Fertil. Steril. 1992, 57:648-653.
17. Evenson D.P., Thompson L., Jost L. Flow cytometric evaluation of boar semen by the sperm chromatin structure assay as related to cryopreservation and fertility. Theriogenology 1994, 41:637-665.
18. Farrell P.B., Trouern-Trend V., Foote R.H., Douglas-Hamilton D. Repeatability of measurements on human, rabbit, and bull sperm by computer-assisted sperm analysis when comparing individual fields and means of 12 fields. Fertil. Steril. 1995, 64:208-210.
19. Farrell P.B., Presicce G.A., Brockett C.C., Foote R.H. Quantification of bull sperm characteristics measured by Computer-Assisted Sperm Analysis (CASA) and the relationship to fertility. Theriogenology 1998, 49:871-879.
20. Glogowski, Kolman R., Szczepkowski M., Horvath A., Urbanyi B., Sieczyński P., Rzemieniecki A., Domagala J., Demianowicz W., Kowalski R., Ciereszko A. Fertilization rate of Siberian sturgeon (Acipenser baeri, Brandt) milt cryopreserved with methanol. Aquaculture 2002, 211:367-373.
21. Graham J.K., Mocé E. Fertility evaluation of frozen-thawed semen. Theriogenology 2005, 64:492-504.
22. Guthrie H.D., Liu J., Critser J.K. Osmotic tolerance limits and effects of cryoprotectants on motility of bovine spermatozoa. Biol. Reprod. 2002, 67:1811-1816.
23. Harvey B., Kelley R.N., Ashwood-Smith M.J. Cryopreservation of zebra fish spermatozoa using methanol. Can. J. Zool. 1982, 60:1867-1870.
24. Henry M., Snoeck P.P.N., Cottorello A.C.P. Post-thaw spermatozoa plasma integrity and motility of stallion semen frozen with different cryoprotectants. Theriogenology 2002, 58:245-248.
25. Januskauskas A., Gil J., Söderquist L., Håård M.G.M., Håård MCh., Johannisson A., Rodriguez-Mártinez H. Effect of cooling rates on post-thaw sperm motility, membrane integrity, capacitation status and fertility of dairy bull semen used for artificial insemination in Sweden. Theriogenology 1999, 52:641-658.
26. Januskauskas A., Johannisson A., Rodriguez-Martinez H. Assessment of sperm quality through fluorometry and sperm chromatin structure assay in relation to field fertility of frozen-thawed semen from Swedish AI bulls. Theriogenology 2001, 55:947-961.
27. Januskauskas A., Johannisson A., Rodriguez-Martinez H. Subtle membrane changes in cryopreserved bull semen in relation with sperm viability, chromatin structure, and field fertility. Theriogenology 2003, 60:743-758.
28. Jasko D.J., Little T.V., Lein D.H., Foote R.H. Comparison of spermatozoal movement and semen characteristics with fertility in stallions: 64 cases (1987-1988). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1992, 200:979-985.
29. Mantovani R., Rota A., Falomo M.E., Bailoni L., Vincenti L. Comparison between glycerol and ethylene glycol for the cryopreservation of equine spermatozoa: sperm quality assessment with standard analyses and with the hypoosmotic swelling test. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 2002, 42:217-226.
30. Mehmood A., Anwar M., Saqlan Naqvi S.M. Motility, acrosome integrity, membrane integrity and oocyte cleavage rate of sperm separated by swim-up or Percoll gradient method from frozen-thawed buffalo semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2009, 111:141-148.
31. Mims S.D., Tsvetkova L.I., Brown G.G., Gomelsky B.I. Cryopreservation of sperm of sturgeon and paddlefish. Cryopreservation in Aquatic Species 2000, 123-129. World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, USA. T.R. Tiersch, P.M. Mazik (Eds.).
32. Molinia F.C., Evans G., Maxwell W.M.C. Incorporating of penetrating cryoprotectants in diluents for pellet-freezing ram spermatozoa. Theriogenology 1994, 42:849-858.
33. Moore A.I., Squires E.L., Bruemmer J.E., Graham J.K. Effect of cooling rate and cryoprotectant on the cryosurvival of equine spermatozoa. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2006, 26:215-218.
34. Muino, Tamargo R.C., Hidalgo C.O., Pena A.I. Identification of sperm subpopulations with defined motility characteristics in ejaculates from Holstein bulls: effects of cryopreservation and between-bull variation. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2008, 109:27-39.
35. Pfaff, R.T., 1994. Effects of cryoprotectants on viability of equine embryos. MS Thesis, Colorado State University.
36. Polge C., Smith A.U., Parkes A.S. Revival of spermatozoa after vitrification and dehydration at low temperatures. Nature 1949, 164:666-676.
37. Rota A., Milani C., Cabianca G., Martini M. Comparison between glycerol and ethylene glycol for dog semen cryopreservation. Theriogenology 2006, 65:1848-1858.
38. Salamon S., Maxwell W.M.C. Frozen storage of ram semen II. Causes of low fertility after cervical insemination and methods of improvement. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 1995, 38:1-36.
39. SAS SAS User's Guide, Statistics 1990, Statistical Analysis System 271 Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
40. Seidel G.E. Cryopreservation of equine embryos. Vet. Clin. North Am.: Equine Pract. 1996, 12:85-99.
41. Soares M.P., Rossi C.A.R., Mezzalira A., Cecim M. Etileno glycol na criopreservacçao de semen canino. Ciencia Rural 2002, 32:649-655. (in Portuguese with English abstract).
42. Squires E.L., Keith S.L., Graham J.K. Evaluation of alternative cryoprotectants for preserving stallion spermatozoa. Theriogenology 2004, 62:1056-1065.
43. Ticiano G.L., Vicente R.V.F.R.P.A., André F.C.A., Lucas L.E., Fabiane G.Z., Jorge A.M.M., Venício J.A. Effects of extender and equilibration time on post-thaw motility and membrane integrity of cryopreserved Gyr bull semen evaluated by CASA and flow cytometry. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2010, 120:31-38.
44. Tsvetkova L.I., Cosson J., Linhart O., Billard R. Motility and fertilizing capacity of fresh and frozen-thawed spermatozoa in sturgeons Acipenser baeri and A. ruthenus. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 1996, 12:107-112.
45. Urbanyi B., Horváth A., Kovaćs B. Successful hybridization of Acipenser species using cryopreserved sperm. Aquac. Int. 2003, 12:47-56.
46. Verstegen J., Iguer-Ouada M., Onclin K. Computer assisted semen analyzers in andrology research and veterinary practice. Theriogenology 2002, 57:149-179.
47. Yamamoto Y., Oguri N., Tsutsumi Y., Hachinohe Y. Experiments in the freezing and storage of equine embryos. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1982, 32(Suppl.):399-403.
48. Zhang B.R., Larsson B., Lundeheim N., Rodriguez-Martinez H. Sperm characteristics and zona pellucida binding in relation to field fertility of frozen-thawed semen from dairy AI bulls. Int. J. Androl. 1998, 21:207-216.