Longitudinal elastic properties and porosity of cortical bone tissue vary with age in human proximal femur

Bone

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 451-458

  Malo, M K H ^a,b   Rohrbach, D ^c   Isaksson, H ^a,d   Toyras J ^a,b   Jurvelin, J S ^a   Tamminen, I S ^a,b   Kroger H ^a,b   Raum, K ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^b KUOPIO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^c CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^d LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bone; Cortex; Scanning acoustic microscopy; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE; ACOUSTIC MICROSCOPY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; BONE STRUCTURE; CADAVER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL BONE; ECHOGRAPHY; ELASTICITY; FEMUR; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IN VIVO STUDY; MALE; POROSITY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; THICKNESS; TISSUE CHARACTERIZATION; TRABECULAR BONE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; BONE AND BONES; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; MALE; MICROSCOPY, ACOUSTIC; MIDDLE AGED; POROSITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84873486509     PISSN: 87563282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.01.015     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Kanis J.A., Johansson H., Oden A., McCloskey E.V. Assessment of fracture risk. Eur J Radiol 2009, 71:392-397.
2. Parfitt A.M. Age-related structural changes in trabecular and cortical bone: cellular mechanisms and biomechanical consequences. Calcif Tissue Int 1984, 36(Suppl. 1):S123-S128.
3. Melton L.J. Hip fractures: a worldwide problem today and tomorrow. Bone 1993, 14(Suppl. 1):S1-S8.
4. Kanis J.A. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group. Osteoporos Int 1994, 4:368-381.
5. Rikkonen T., Salovaara K., Sirola J., Karkkainen M., Tuppurainen M., Jurvelin J., et al. Physical activity slows femoral bone loss but promotes wrist fractures in postmenopausal women: a 15-year follow-up of the OSTPRE study. J Bone Miner Res 2010, 25:2332-2340.
6. Karkkainen M., Rikkonen T., Kroger H., Sirola J., Tuppurainen M., Salovaara K., et al. Physical tests for patient selection for bone mineral density measurements in postmenopausal women. Bone 2009, 44:660-665.
7. Karkkainen M., Rikkonen T., Kroger H., Sirola J., Tuppurainen M., Salovaara K., et al. Association between functional capacity tests and fractures: an eight-year prospective population-based cohort study. Osteoporos Int 2008, 19:1203-1210.
8. Milovanovic P., Djonic D., Marshall R.P., Hahn M., Nikolic S., Zivkovic V., et al. Micro-structural basis for particular vulnerability of the superolateral neck trabecular bone in the postmenopausal women with hip fractures. Bone 2012, 50:63-68.
9. Yeni Y.N., Norman T.L. Fracture toughness of human femoral neck: effect of microstructure, composition, and age. Bone 2000, 26:499-504.
10. Raum K. Book paragraph in "Bone Quantitative Ultrasound" 2011, Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg, London, New York.
11. Gluer C.C. A new quality of bone ultrasound research. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2008, 55:1524-1528.
12. Isaksson H., Nagao S., Malkiewicz M., Julkunen P., Nowak R., Jurvelin J.S. Precision of nanoindentation protocols for measurement of viscoelasticity in cortical and trabecular bone. J Biomech 2010, 43:2410-2417.
13. Rho J.Y., Zioupos P., Currey J.D., Pharr G.M. Microstructural elasticity and regional heterogeneity in human femoral bone of various ages examined by nano-indentation. J Biomech 2002, 35:189-198.
14. Lakshmanan S., Bodi A., Raum K. Assessment of anisotropic tissue elasticity of cortical bone from high-resolution, angular acoustic measurements. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2007, 54:1560-1570.
15. Preininger B., Checa S., Molnar F.L., Fratzl P., Duda G.N., Raum K. Spatial-temporal mapping of bone structural and elastic properties in a sheep model following osteotomy. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011, 37:474-483.
16. Katz J.L., Meunier A. Scanning acoustic microscope studies of the elastic properties of osteons and osteon lamellae. J Biomech Eng 1993, 115:543-548.
17. Hofmann T., Heyroth F., Meinhard H., Franzel W., Raum K. Assessment of composition and anisotropic elastic properties of secondary osteon lamellae. J Biomech 2006, 39:2282-2294.
18. Rohrbach D., Lakshmanan S., Peyrin F., Langer M., Gerisch A., Grimal Q., et al. Spatial distribution of tissue level properties in a human femoral cortical bone. J Biomech 2012, 45:2264-2270.
19. Raum K. Microelastic imaging of bone. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2008, 55:1417-1431.
20. Raum K., Reisshauer J., Brandt J. Frequency and resolution dependence of the anisotropic impedance estimation in cortical bone using time-resolved scanning acoustic microscopy. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004, 71:430-438.
21. Weiss S., Zimmerman M.C., Harten R.D., Alberta F.G., Meunier A. The acoustic and structural properties of the human femur. J Biomech Eng 1998, 120:71-76.
22. Raum K., Leguerney I., Chandelier F., Talmant M., Saied A., Peyrin F., et al. Site-matched assessment of structural and tissue properties of cortical bone using scanning acoustic microscopy and synchrotron radiation muCT. Phys Med Biol 2006, 51:733-746.
23. Raum K., Cleveland R.O., Peyrin F., Laugier P. Derivation of elastic stiffness from site-matched mineral density and acoustic impedance maps. Phys Med Biol 2006, 51:747-758.
24. Granke M., Grimal Q., Saied A., Nauleau P., Peyrin F., Laugier P. Change in porosity is the major determinant of the variation of cortical bone elasticity at the millimeter scale in aged women. Bone 2011, 49:1020-1026.
25. Grimal Q., Raum K., Gerisch A., Laugier P. Derivation of the mesoscopic elasticity tensor of cortical bone from quantitative impedance images at the micron scale. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2008, 11:147-157.
26. Bumrerraj S., Katz J.L. Scanning acoustic microscopy study of human cortical and trabecular bone. Ann Biomed Eng 2001, 29:1034-1042.
27. Saied A., Raum K., Leguerney I., Laugier P. Spatial distribution of anisotropic acoustic impedance assessed by time-resolved 50-MHz scanning acoustic microscopy and its relation to porosity in human cortical bone. Bone 2008, 43:187-194.
28. Turner C.H., Rho J., Takano Y., Tsui T.Y., Pharr G.M. The elastic properties of trabecular and cortical bone tissues are similar: results from two microscopic measurement techniques. J Biomech 1999, 32:437-441.
29. Linde F., Sorensen H.C. The effect of different storage methods on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. J Biomech 1993, 26:1249-1252.
30. Sedlin E.D., Hirsch C. Factors affecting the determination of the physical properties of femoral cortical bone. Acta Orthop Scand 1966, 37:29-48.
31. van Haaren E.H., van der Zwaard B.C., van der Veen A.J., Heyligers I.C., Wuisman P.I., Smit T.H. Effect of long-term preservation on the mechanical properties of cortical bone in goats. Acta Orthop 2008, 79:708-716.
32. Hube R., Mayr H., Hein W., Raum K. Prediction of biomechanical stability after callus distraction by high resolution scanning acoustic microscopy. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006, 32:1913-1921.
33. Preininger B., Hesse B., Rohrbach D., Varga P., Gerigk H., Langer M., et al. Histogram feature-based classification improves differentiability of early bone healing stages from micro-computed tomographic data. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2012, 36:469-476.
34. Grimal Q., Haupert S., Mitton D., Vastel L., Laugier P. Assessment of cortical bone elasticity and strength: mechanical testing and ultrasound provide complementary data. Med Eng Phys 2009, 31:1140-1147.
35. Espinoza Orias A.A., Deuerling J.M., Landrigan M.D., Renaud J.E., Roeder R.K. Anatomic variation in the elastic anisotropy of cortical bone tissue in the human femur. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2009, 2:255-263.
36. Bergmann G., Deuretzbacher G., Heller M., Graichen F., Rohlmann A., Strauss J., et al. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech 2001, 34:859-871.
37. Nyman J.S., Reyes M., Wang X. Effect of ultrastructural changes on the toughness of bone. Micron 2005, 36:566-582.
38. Zioupos P. Ageing human bone: factors affecting its biomechanical properties and the role of collagen. J Biomater Appl 2001, 15:187-229.
39. Wall J.C., Chatterji S.K., Jeffery J.W. Age-related changes in the density and tensile strength of human femoral cortical bone. Calcif Tissue Int 1979, 27:105-108.
40. Bousson V., Bergot C., Meunier A., Barbot F., Parlier-Cuau C., Laval-Jeantet A.M., et al. CT of the middiaphyseal femur: cortical bone mineral density and relation to porosity. Radiology 2000, 217:179-187.
41. Bousson V., Meunier A., Bergot C., Vicaut E., Rocha M.A., Morais M.H., et al. Distribution of intracortical porosity in human midfemoral cortex by age and gender. J Bone Miner Res 2001, 16:1308-1317.
42. Cooper D.M., Thomas C.D., Clement J.G., Turinsky A.L., Sensen C.W., Hallgrimsson B. Age-dependent change in the 3D structure of cortical porosity at the human femoral midshaft. Bone 2007, 40:957-965.
43. Feik S.A., Thomas C.D., Clement J.G. Age-related changes in cortical porosity of the midshaft of the human femur. J Anat 1997, 191(Pt 3):407-416.
44. Stein M.S., Feik S.A., Thomas C.D., Clement J.G., Wark J.D. An automated analysis of intracortical porosity in human femoral bone across age. J Bone Miner Res 1999, 14:624-632.
45. Thomas C.D., Feik S.A., Clement J.G. Regional variation of intracortical porosity in the midshaft of the human femur: age and sex differences. J Anat 2005, 206:115-125.
46. Chen H., Zhou X., Shoumura S., Emura S., Bunai Y. Age- and gender-dependent changes in three-dimensional microstructure of cortical and trabecular bone at the human femoral neck. Osteoporos Int 2010, 21:627-636.
47. Bell K.L., Loveridge N., Power J., Garrahan N., Meggitt B.F., Reeve J. Regional differences in cortical porosity in the fractured femoral neck. Bone 1999, 24:57-64.
48. Bell K.L., Loveridge N., Reeve J., Thomas C.D., Feik S.A., Clement J.G. Super-osteons (remodeling clusters) in the cortex of the femoral shaft: influence of age and gender. Anat Rec 2001, 264:378-386.
49. Chappard C, Bensalah S, Olivier C, Gouttenoire PJ, Marchadier A, Benhamou C, et al. 3Dcharacterization of pores in the cortical bone of human femur in the elderly at different locations as determined by synchrotron micro-computed tomography images. Osteoporos Int in press. [Epub ahead of print]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-012-2044-4.
50. Barkmann R., Dencks S., Laugier P., Padilla F., Brixen K., Ryg J., et al. Femur ultrasound (FemUS)-first clinical results on hip fracture discrimination and estimation of femoral BMD. Osteoporos Int 2009, 21:969-976.
51. Barkmann R., Laugier P., Moser U., Dencks S., Klausner M., Padilla F., et al. A device for in vivo measurements of quantitative ultrasound variables at the human proximal femur. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2008, 55:1197-1204.
52. Barkmann R., Laugier P., Moser U., Dencks S., Klausner M., Padilla F., et al. In vivo measurements of ultrasound transmission through the human proximal femur. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008, 34:1186-1190.
53. Karjalainen J.P., Riekkinen O., Toyras J., Hakulinen M., Kroger H., Rikkonen T., et al. Multi-site bone ultrasound measurements in elderly women with and without previous hip fractures. Osteoporos Int 2012, 23:1287-1295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1682-2.
54. Karjalainen J., Riekkinen O., Toyras J., Kroger H., Jurvelin J. Ultrasonic assessment of cortical bone thickness in vitro and in vivo. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2008, 55:2191-2197.
55. Cowin S.C., Cardoso L. Fabric dependence of wave propagation in anisotropic porous media. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2011, 10:39-65.
56. Raum K., Leguerney I., Chandelier F., Bossy E., Talmant M., Saied A., et al. Bone microstructure and elastic tissue properties are reflected in QUS axial transmission measurements. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005, 31:1225-1235.
57. Aula A.S., Toyras J., Hakulinen M.A., Jurvelin J.S. Effect of bone marrow on acoustic properties of trabecular bone-3D finite difference modeling study. Ultrasound Med Biol 2009, 35:308-318.
58. Hakulinen M.A., Day J.S., Toyras J., Weinans H., Jurvelin J.S. Ultrasonic characterization of human trabecular bone microstructure. Phys Med Biol 2006, 51:1633-1648.
59. Grassi L., Schileo E., Taddei F., Zani L., Juszczyk M., Cristofolini L., et al. Accuracy of finite element predictions in sideways load configurations for the proximal human femur. J Biomech 2012, 45:394-399.
60. Zimmerman M.C., Prabhakar A., Chokshi B.V., Budhwani N., Berndt H. The acoustic properties of normal and imbedded bovine bone as measured by acoustic microscopy. J Biomed Mater Res 1994, 28:931-938.
61. Roschger P., Paschalis E.P., Fratzl P., Klaushofer K. Bone mineralization density distribution in health and disease. Bone 2008, 42:456-466.
62. Wang X., Ni Q. Determination of cortical bone porosity and pore size distribution using a low field pulsed NMR approach. J Orthop Res 2003, 21:312-319.