Effects of rhyme and spelling patterns on auditory word ERPs depend on selective attention to phonology

Brain and Language

Volumn 124, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 238-243

  Yoncheva, Yuliya N ^a   Maurer, Urs ^b   Zevin, Jason D ^c   McCandliss, Bruce D ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory words; ERP; Orthographic similarity; Phonological similarity; Phonology; Rhyming words; Selective attention; Topography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MELODY; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; RHYME; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPEECH; SPELLING;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 84873450845     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: 10902155     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.12.013     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Berg P., Scherg M. A multiple source approach to the correction of eye artifacts. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1994, 90(3):229-241.
2. Carreiras M., Perea M., Vergara M., Pollatsek A. The time course of orthography and phonology: ERP correlates of masked priming effects in Spanish. Psychophysiology 2009, 46(5):1113-1122.
3. Chereau C., Gaskell M.G., Dumay N. Reading spoken words: orthographic effects in auditory priming. Cognition 2007, 102(3):341-360.
4. Coch D., Grossi G., Coffey-Corina S., Holcomb P.J., Neville H.J. A developmental investigation of ERP auditory rhyming effects. Developmental Science 2003, 5(4):467-489.
5. Cornelissen P.L., Kringelbach M.L., Ellis A.W., Whitney C., Holliday I.E., Hansen P.C. Activation of the left inferior frontal gyrus in the first 200ms of reading: Evidence from magnetoencephalography (MEG). PloS One 2009, 4(4):e5359.
6. Damian M.F., Bowers J.S. Orthographic effects in rhyme monitoring tasks: Are they automatic?. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2010, 22(1):106-116.
7. Desimone R., Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience 1995, 18:193-222.
8. Dumay N., Benraiss A., Barriol B., Colin C., Radeau M., Besson M. Behavioral and electrophysiological study of phonological priming between bisyllabic spoken words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2001, 13(1):121-143.
9. Duncan K.J., Pattamadilok C., Devlin J.T. Investigating occipito-temporal contributions to reading with TMS. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 22(4):739-750.
10. Efron B. Large-scale simultaneous hypothesis testing: the choice of a null hypothesis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2004, 99:96-104.
11. Efron B. Correlation and large-scale simultaneous significance testing. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2007, 102:93-103.
12. Gordon R.L., Schön D., Magne C., Astésano C., Besson M. Words and melody are intertwined in perception of sung words: EEG and behavioral evidence. PloS One 2010, 5(3):e9889.
13. Lehmann D., Skrandies W. Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1980, 48:609-621.
14. Manly, B. F. J. (1991). Randomization and Monte Carlo methods in biology (p. xiii, 281p). Chapman and Hall.
15. McCandliss B.D., Yoncheva Y. Integration of left-lateralized neural systems supporting skilled reading. Developmental dyslexia: Early precursors, neurobehavioral markers and biological substrates (The Extraordinary Brain Series) 2011, 325-339. Brookes Publishing Co., Baltimore, MD. A.A. Benasich, R.A. Fitch (Eds.).
16. McClelland J.L., Rumelhart D.E. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 1981, 88:375-407.
17. Pattamadilok C., Knierim I.N., Kawabata Duncan K.J., Devlin J.T. How does learning to read affect speech perception?. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30(25):8435-8444.
18. Pattamadilok C., Perre L., Dufau S., Ziegler J.C. On-line orthographic influences on spoken language in a semantic task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 21(1):169-179.
19. Pattamadilok C., Perre L., Ziegler J.C. Beyond rhyme or reason: ERPs reveal task-specific activation of orthography on spoken language. Brain and Language 2011, 116(3):116-124.
20. Poldrack R.A. Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10(2):59-63.
21. Posner M.I., Snyder C.R. Attention and cognitive control. Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium 1975, 55-85. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. R. Solso (Ed.).
22. Praamstra P., Meyer A., Levelt W.J.M. Neurophysiological manifestations of phonological processing: latency variation of negative ERP component timelocked to phonological mismatch. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1994, 6(3):204-219.
23. Praamstra P., Stegeman D.F. Phonological effects on the auditory N400 event-related brain potential. Cognitive Brain Research 1993, 1(2):73-86.
24. R Development Core Team (2007). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.r-project.org.
25. Seidenberg M.S., Tanenhaus M.K. Orthographic effects in rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1979, 5:546-554.
26. Strik W.K., Fallgatter A.J., Brandeis D., Pascual-Marqui R.D. Three-dimensional tomography of event-related potentials during response inhibition: evidence for phasic frontal lobe activation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1998, 108:406-413.
27. Strimmer K. A unified approach to false discovery rate estimation. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:303.
28. Strimmer K. Fdrtool: A versatile R package for estimating local and tail area-based false discovery rates. Bioinformatics 2008, 24(12):1461-1462.
29. Tanenhaus M.K., Flanigan H.P., Seidenberg M.S. Orthographic and phonological activation in auditory and visual word recognition. Memory and Cognition 1980, 8:513-520.
30. Woodcock R.W., McGrew K., Mather N. Woodcock-Johnson III 2001, Riverside Publishing, Itasca, IL, USA.
31. Yoncheva Y.N., Blau V., Maurer U., McCandliss B.D. Attentional focus during learning impacts N170 responses to an artificial script. Developmental Neuropsychology 2010, 35(4):423-445.
32. Yoncheva Y.N., Zevin J.D., Maurer U., McCandliss B.D. Auditory selective attention to speech modulates activity in the visual word form area. Cerebral Cortex 2010, 20(3):622-632. 10.1093/cercor/bhp129.
33. Ziegler J.C., Ferrand L. Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1998, 5:683-689.