Portraying the contribution of individual behaviors to team cohesion and performance

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1084-1088

  Parke, Bonny ^a   Orasanu, Judith ^b  

^a SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOR; TEAM MEMBERS;

ERGONOMICS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; PHYSICAL THERAPY; PSYCHOLOGY COMPUTING;

ADHESION;

EID: 84873439157     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1177/1071181312561236     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Bales, R. F. (1953). Equilibrium problem in small groups. In T. Parsons, R. F. Bales & E. A. Shils (Eds.), Working Papers in the Theory of Action (pp. 111-161): Free Press.
2. Bales, R. F., & Cohen, S. P. (1979). SYMLOG: A system for the multiple level observation of groups. NY: The Free Press.
3. Bell, S. T. (2007). Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis. J. Applied Psychology, 92(3), 595-615.
4. Carron, A. V., Colman, M. M., Wheeler, J., & Stevens, D. (2002). Cohesion and performance in sport: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24, 168-188.
5. Clarke, L., & Ritscher, J. B. (2004). Humor as a potential training factor for International Space Station program personnel. Aviaion, Space, & Environmental Medicine, 75, B61.
6. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
7. Couch, A. (1960). Psychological determinants of interpersonal behavior. Harvard University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
8. Eid, J., & Johnsen, B. H. (2002). Acute stress reactions after submarine accidents. Military Medicine, 167(5), 427-431.
9. Emmerich, W. (1968). Personality development and concepts of structure. Child Development, 39, 671-690.
10. Emmerich, W. (1973). Structure and development of personal-social behaviors in economically disadvantaged preschool children. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
11. Entin, E. E., Kerrigan, C., Serfaty, D., & Yound, P. (1998). Development of a search and rescue simulation to study the effects of prolonged isolation on decision making (TR-853). Burlington, MA: Alphatech, Inc.
12. Fine, G. A. (1986). Behavioral change in group space: A reintegration of Lewinian theory in small group research. Advances in Group Processes, 3, 23-50.
13. Fischer, U., McDonnell, L., & Orasanu, J. (2007). Linguistic correlates of team performance: Toward a tool for monitoring team functioning during space missions. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine: Operational Applications of Cognitive Performance Enhancement Technologies, 78(5), II, B86-95.
14. Isenberg, D. J., & Ennis, J. G. (1981). A comparison of derived and imposed dimensions. J. of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(2), 293-305.
15. Jaffe, E. D., & Nebebzahl, I. D. (1990). Group interaction and business game performance. Simulation & Gaming, 21(2), 133-146.
16. Keyton, J., & Springston, J. (1990). Redefining cohesiveness in groups. Small Group Research, 21(2), 234-254.
17. MacCoun, R. J. (1993). Unit cohesion and military performance. In Sexual orientation and U.S. military personnel policy: Policy options and assessment. Santa Monica: National Defense Research Institute, RAND, (pp. 283-331).
18. Moos, R. H., & Humphrey, B. (1974). Group Environment Scale, Form R. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
19. Moreno, J. L. (1960). The Sociometry Reader. NY: The Free Press.
20. Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psych.l Bulletin, 115(2), 210-227.
21. Oliver, L. W., Harman, J., Hoover, E., Hayes, S. M., & Pandhi, N. A. (2000). A quantitative integration of the military cohesion literature. Military Psychology, 11(1), 57-83.
22. Orasanu, J., Fischer, U., Parke, B., McDonnell, L., Kraft, N., & Anderson, B. (2009). Alternative Techniques for Monitoring and Evaluating Team Cohesion. Final Report submitted to the Behavioral Health and Performance Element, NASA Human Research Program. Moffett Field, CA: NASA.
23. Parke, B. (1985). A field adaptation of the SYMLOG adjective rating form suitable for populations including children. International Journal of Small Group Research, 1(1), 89-95.
24. Parke, B., & Houben, H. C. (1985). An objective analysis of group types. International Journal of Small Group Research, 13, 131-149.
25. Parke, B., & Houben, H. C. (1988). Analyses of subgroups and clusterings within groups: Attaining knowledge of the social interaction potential. International Journal of Small Group Research, 4, 143-158.
26. Parke, B., Kanki, B., Nord, K., & Bianchi, A. (2000). Crew climate and performance: Use of group diagrams based on behavioral ratings, Proceedings of the 44th International Ergonomics Association/HFES Congress, 3149-3152. San Diego, CA.
27. Phipps, S., & Mulhern, R. K. (1995). Family cohesion and expressiveness promote resilience to the stress of pediatric bone marrow transplant: A preliminary report. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 16(4), 257-263.
28. Rywick, T. (1987). SYMLOG rating form reliability. International Journal of Small Group Research, 3(1), 119-125.
29. Schaefer, E. S. (1971). Development of hierarchical configurational models for parent behavior and child behavior. In J. P. Hill (Ed.), Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology (Vol. 5). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
30. Schaefer, E. S., Droppleman, L. F., & Kalverboaer, A. F. (1965). Development of a classroom behavior checklist and factor analyses of children's school behavior in the United States and the Netherlands. Bethesda, Maryland: National Institute of Mental Health.
31. Wish, M., D'Andrade, R. G., & Goodnow, J. E. (1980). Dimensions of interpersonal communication: Correspondences between structures for speech acts and bipolar scales. J. Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 848-860.