Linguistic correlates of team performance: Toward a tool for monitoring team functioning during space missions

Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine

Volumn 78, Issue 5 II, 2007, Pages

  Fischer, Ute ^a   McDonnell, Lori ^b   Orasanu, Judith ^b  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Task related and social aspects of team communication; Team processes; Team work

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PERFORMANCE; RESCUE PERSONNEL; SPACE; TEAMWORK; UNITED STATES;

AEROSPACE MEDICINE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMMUNICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; RESCUE WORK; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 34248174954     PISSN: 00956562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Bales RF. Interaction process analysis: a method for the study of small groups. Reprint. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 1976.
2. Ball JR, Evans, EH, eds. Safe passage: astronaut care for exploration missions. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
3. Bishop SL. Psychosocial issues in crew selection: finding the right mix of the right stuff. In: Cultural and gender issues in long-duration flights. 12th Man in Space Symposium: The Future of Humans in Space. Washington, D.C.: NASA; Report No. 19980024349; 1997:86-92.
4. Bowers CA, Jentsch F, Salas E, Braun CC. Analyzing communication sequences for team training needs. Hum Factors 1998; 40:672-9.
5. Buehlman KT, Gottman JM, Katz LF. How a couple views their past predicts their future: predicting divorce from an oral history interview. J Fam Psychol 1992; 5:295-318.
6. Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E. Team performance and training in complex environments: recent findings from research. Curr Direct Psychol Sci 1998; 7:83-7.
7. Carrère S, Gottman JM. Predicting divorce among newlyweds from the first three minutes of a marital conflict discussion. Fam Processes 1999; 38:293-301.
8. Clark HH, Schaefer EF. Contributing to discourse. Cognit Sci 1989; 13:259-94.
9. Clarke L, Ritsher JB. Humor as a potential training factor for international space station program personnel. [Abstract]. Aviat Space Environ Med 2004; 75:B61.
10. Costa PT, McCrae RR. Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO-FFI): professional manual. Odessa, FL: PAR, Inc.; 1992.
11. Cushing S. Fatal words: communication clashes and aircraft crashes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1997.
12. Entin EE, Kerrigan C, Serfaty D, Yound P. Development of a search and rescue simulation to study the effects of prolonged isolation on decision making (TR-853). Burlington, MA: ALPHATECH, Inc.; 1998.
13. th Annual Meeting; 2000 July 30-Aug. 4; San Diego, CA. Santa Monica, CA: HFES; 2000.
14. Gottman JM. Specific affect coding system manual (20-code version 4.0). Seattle, WA: University of Washington; 1998.
15. Graham EE. The involvement of a sense of humor in the development of social relationships. Commun Rep 1995; 8:158-69.
16. Grice HP. Logic and conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan JL, eds. Syntax and semantics, volume 3: speech acts. New York: Seminar Press; 1975:225-42.
17. th IAA Human in Space Symposium; 2005 May 22-26; Graz, Austria. Stockholm, Sweden: IAA; 2005.
18. Hart SG, Staveland LE. Development of the NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock PA, Meshkati, N, eds. Human mental workload. Oxford, England: North-Holland; 1988:139-83.
19. Hirokawa RY. Group communication and problem solving effectiveness: an investigation of group phases. Hum Commun Res 1983; 9:291-305.
20. Kanas N, Salnitskiy V, Grund EM, et al. Psychosocial issues in space: results from Shuttle/Mir. Gravit Space Biol Bull 2001; 14:35-45.
21. Kanas N, Weiss DS, Marmar CR. Crew member interactions during a Mir space station simulation. Aviat Space Environ Med 1996; 67:969-75.
22. Kanki BG, Lozito SC, Foushee HC. Communication indices of crew coordination. Aviat Space Environ Med 1989; 60:56-60.
23. Kass R, Kass J. Psycho-social training for man in space. Acta Astronaut 1999; 45:115-8.
24. Keyton J. Relational communication in groups. In: Frey LR, ed. The handbook of group communication theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1999:192-222.
25. Kiekel PA, Cooke NJ, Foltz PW, Shopes MM. Automating measurement of team cognition through analysis of communication data. In: Smith MJ, Salvendy G, Harris D, Koubek RJ, eds. Usability evaluation and interface design: cognitive engineering, intelligent agents and virtual reality. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates; 2001:1382-6.
26. th Annual Meeting; 2002 Sept. 29-Oct. 4; Baltimore, MD. Santa Monica, CA: HFES; 2002.
27. th Annual Meeting; 2004 Sept. 20-24; New Orleans, LA. Santa Monica, CA: HFES; 2004.
28. Krokoff LJ, Gottman JM, Hass SD. Validation of a global couples interaction scoring system. Behav Assess 1989; 11:65-80.
29. Lauche K, Ehbets Müller R, Mbiti K. Understanding and supporting innovation in teams. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Engineering Design; 2001 Aug. 21-23; Glasgow, Scotland. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2001.
30. th International Conference on Naturalistic Decision Making; 2005 June 15-17; Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Delft, The Netherlands: TNO; 2005.
31. Millar FE, Rogers EL. A relational approach to interpersonal communication. In: Miller GR, ed. Explorations in interpersonal communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage 1976; 87-103.
32. Mullen B, Copper C. The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: an integration. Psychol Bull 1994; 115:210-27.
33. NASA. Bioastronautics critical roadmap. Retrieved February 11, 2006, from: http://bioastroroadmap.nasa.gov/User/risk.jsp-?showData=24.
34. Orasanu J. Shared problem models and flight crew performance. In: Johnston N, McDonald N, Fuller R, eds. Aviation psychology in practice. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing; 1994:255-85.
35. th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society; 1992 July 29-Aug 1; Bloomington, IN. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Publishers; 1992.
36. th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 2004 Sept. 20-24; New Orleans, LA. Santa Monica, CA: HFES; 2004.
37. Orasanu J, Tada Y, Kraft N, Fischer U. Physiological monitoring of team and task stress. In: Caldwell JA, Wesensten NJ, eds. Proceedings of SPIE: biomonitoring for physiological and cognitive performance during military operations. Bellingham, WA: The International Society for Optical Engineering; 2005: 182-92.
38. Palinkas LA, Gunderson EKE, Holland AW, et al. Predictors of behavior and performance in extreme environments: the Antarctic space analogue program. Aviat Space Environ Med 2000; 71:619-25.
39. Palmer M. Controlling conversations: turns, topics and interpersonal control. Commun Monogr 1989; 56:1-18.
40. Pennebaker JW, Francis ME, Booth RJ. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC 2001) software and manual. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Publishers; 2003.
41. Pennebaker JW, Mehl MR, Niederhoffer KG. Psychological aspects of natural language use: our words, our selves. Annu Rev Psychol 2003; 54:547-77.
42. Resnick LB, Salmon M, Zeith CM, et al. Reasoning in conversation. Cogn Instruc 1993; 11:347-64.
43. Rogers LE, Farace RV. Analysis of relational communication in dyads: new measurement procedures. Hum Commun Res 1975; 1:222-39.
44. Sandal G, Endresen IM, Vaernes R, Ursin H. Personality and coping strategies during submarine missions. Mil Psychol 1999; 11:381-404.
45. Sandal G, Vaernes R, Ursin H. Interpersonal relations during simulated space missions. Aviat Space Environ Med 1995; 66:617-24.
46. Schegloff EA, Sacks H. Opening up closings. Semiotica 1973; 7:289-327.
47. th Annual Meeting; 1993 Oct. 11-15; Seattle, WA. Santa Monica, CA: HFES; 1993.
48. Sexton JB, Helmreich RL. Analyzing cockpit communication. The link between language, performance, error, and workload. Hum Perf Extrem Environ 2000; 5:63-8.
49. SSB and NRC. A strategy for research in space biology and medicine into the next century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1998.
50. Stuster J, Bachelard C, Suedfeld P. The relative importance of behavioral issues during long-duration ICE missions. Aviat Space Environ Med 2000; 71(9, Suppl.):17A-25A.
51. Watzlawick P, Beavin J, Jackson DD. Pragmatics of human communication: a study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York, NY: Norton & Company; 1967.