A collaborative framework to minimise knowledge loss in new product development

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 51, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 2049-2059

  Shankar, Ravi ^a   Mittal, Neha ^b   Rabinowitz, Samuel ^c   Baveja, Alok ^c   Acharia, Sourish ^d  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DELHI   (India)

^b TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Hero Corporate Services Ltd   (India)

Author keywords

automotive industry; collaborative networks; India; knowledge loss; knowledge management; new product development

Indexed keywords

CHANGING DYNAMICS; COLLABORATIVE FRAMEWORK; COLLABORATIVE NETWORK; INDIA; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION; KEY DETERMINANTS; LOSS THROUGHOUT; MANUFACTURING COMPANIES; MULTI-LAYERED; NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; PRODUCT LIFE CYCLES; VALUE CHAINS;

AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY; LIFE CYCLE; LOSS PREVENTION; MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT SCIENCE; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84873437909     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: 1366588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2012.701779     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alhashmi, S, Siddiqi, J, and, Akhgar, B. 2006. Staying competitive by managing organisational knowledge. Engineering Management, 16 (2): 43-45.
2. Arora, R. 2002. Implementing KM-a balanced score card approach. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6 (3): 240
3. Balasubramaniam, R, and, Tiwana, A. 1999. Supporting collaborative process knowledge management in new product development teams. Decision Support Systems, 27 (1-2): 213-235.
4. Becerra-Fernandez, I, González, AJ, and, Sabherwal, R. 2004. Knowledge management: challenges, solutions, and technologies, 1st, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5. Blumentritt, R, and, Johnston, R. 1999. Towards a strategy for knowledge management. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 11 (3): 287-300.
6. Bose, R. 2004. Knowledge management metrics. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 104 (6): 457-468.
7. Cross, R, Borgatti, SP, and, Parker, A. 2002. Making invisible work visible: using social network analysis to support strategic collaboration. California Management Review, 44 (2): 25-46.
8. Chinowsky, P, and, Carrillo, P. 2007. Knowledge management to learning organization connection. Journal of Management in Engineering, 23 (3): 122-130.
9. Damijan, JP. Jaklic, A., and Rojec, M. 2006. Do external knowledge spillovers induce firms innovations-evidence from Slovenia. LICOS Discussion Paper No. 156/2005. Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=881522 [Accessed 4 August 2011]
10. Durst, S. 1. Wilhelm, S. Prometheus, 2011. Knowledge management in practice: insights into a medium-sized enterprise's exposure to knowledge loss. Journal of Knowledge Management, 29,. 23-38
11. Fairchild, AM. 2002. Knowledge management metrics via a balanced scorecard methodology. In: Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2002, 7-10 January 2002, Hawaii's Big Island. IEEE Computer Society. Available from: http://www.computer.org/comp/proceedings/ hicss/2002/1435/08/14350243.pdf [Accessed 30 July 2011]
12. Frappaolo, C. 1999. Establishing an organizational benchmark for knowledge. Delphi Group. Available from: http://kwork.org/Stars/Benchmark.pdf [Accessed 1 August 2011]
13. Hussi, T. 2004. Reconfiguring knowledge management-combining intellectual capital, intangible assets and knowledge creation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8 (2): 36-52.
14. Jia, P, and, Xia, Q. 2008. Knowledge management, collaboration and innovation. In: Proceedings of the Future Information Technology and Management Engineering, FITME 08, 20 November 2008, Washington D.C., USA, IEEE Computer Society: 228-232.
15. Kurawarwala, AA, and, Matsuo, H. 1996. Forecasting and inventory management of short life cycle products. Operations Research, 44 (1): 131-150.
16. Leal, A, and, Roldan, JL. 2001. Benchmarking and knowledge management. OR Insight, 14: 11-22.
17. Liebowitz, J. 2011. What practitioners need to know. KM World, 20 (2): 12-13.
18. Lynn, GS. 1998. New product team learning: developing and profiting from your knowledge capital. California Management Review, 4 (4): 74-93.
19. Mascarenhas, B, Baveja, A, and, Jamil, M. 1998. Dynamics of core competencies in leading multinational companies. California Management Review, 40 (4): 117-132.
20. McAdam, R, and, McCreedy, S. 1996. A critical review of knowledge management models. The Learning Organization, 6 (3): 91-100.
21. McGrath, RG, and, MacMillan, IC. 2009. How to rethink your business during uncertainty. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50 (3): 24-30.
22. Nonaka, Y. 1991. The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, 32 (3): 27-38.
23. Norman, PM. 2004. Knowledge acquisition, knowledge loss, and satisfaction in high technology alliances. Journal of Business Research, 57 (6): 610-619.
24. Parise, S, Cross, R, and, Davenport, TH. 2006. Strategies for preventing a knowledge-loss crisis. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47 (4): 31-38.
25. Rieger, B. Kleber, A., and Von Maur, E., 2000. Metadata-based integration of qualitative and quantitative information resources approaching knowledge management. In: Proceedings of the 8th European Conference of Information Systems, 372-378
26. Su, CT, Chen, YH, and, Sha, DY. 2007. Managing product and customer knowledge in innovative new product development. International Journal of Technology Management, 39 (1-2): 105-130.
27. Volkov, D, and, Garanina, T. 2007. Intangible assets: importance in the knowledge-based economy and the role in value creation of a company. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 5 (4): 539-550.
28. Wells, RMJ. 2008. The product innovation process: are managing information flows and cross-functional collaboration key?. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22 (1): 58-60.
29. Will, AJ. 2011. Motivating knowledge sharing in engineering and construction organizations: the power of social motivations. Journal of Management in Engineering, 27 (2), 193-202
30. Zhena, L, Jianga, Z, and, Songb, HT. 2011. Distributed knowledge sharing for collaborative product development. International Journal of Production Research, 49 (10): 2959-2976.