Evaluation of the 7th american joint committee on cancer tnm staging system for prostate cancer in point of classification of bladder neck invasion

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 184-188

  Chung, Mun Su ^a   Lee, Seung Hwan ^b   Lee, Dong Hoon ^b   Chung, Byung Ha ^b  

^a The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Bladder; Neoplasm staging; Prostatectomy; Prostatic neoplasms

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASIAN; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE FREE SURVIVAL; BLADDER METASTASIS; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER GROWTH; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; SEMINAL VESICLE DISEASE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; ODDS RATIO; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; REPUBLIC OF KOREA; TUMOR MARKERS, BIOLOGICAL; URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84873435306     PISSN: 03682811     EISSN: 14653621     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hys196     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009;59:225-49.
2. Kim IS, Na W, Nam JS, et al. Interval from prostate biopsy to robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP): effects on surgical difficulties. Korean J Urol 2011;52:664-8.
3. Beahrs OH, Henson DE, Hutter RVP, Kennedy BJ. American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual for Staging of Cancer, 4th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, 1992.
4. Fleming ID, Cooper JS, Henson DE, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. Philadelphia: Lippincott Raven, 1997.
5. Greene FL, Page DL, Flemming ID, Fritz AG, Balch CM, Haller DG, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th edn. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2002.
6. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual, 7th edn. New York: Springer, 2010.
7. True LD. Surgical pathology examination of the prostate gland. Practice survey by American society of clinical pathologists. Am J Clin Pathol 1994;102:572-9.
8. Obek C, Sadek S, Lai S, Civantos F, Rubinowicz D, Soloway MS. Positive surgical margins with radical retropubic prostatectomy: anatomic site-specific pathologic analysis and impact on prognosis. Urology 1999;54:682-8.
9. Yossepowitch O, Sircar K, Scardino PT, et al. Bladder neck involvement in pathological stage pT4 radical prostatectomy specimens is not an independent prognostic factor. J Urol 2002;168:2011-5.
10. Poulos CK, Koch MO, Eble JN, Daggy JK, Cheng L. Bladder neck invasion is an independent predictor of prostatespecific antigen recurrence. Cancer 2004;101:1563-8.
11. Blute ML, Bostwick DG, Bergstralh EJ, et al. Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy. Urology 1997;50:733-9.
12. Dash A, Sanda MG, Yu M, Taylor JM, Fecko A, Rubin MA. Prostate cancer involving the bladder neck: recurrence-free survival and implications for AJCC staging modification. American Joint Committee on Cancer. Urology 2002;60:276-80.
13. Yossepowitch O, Engelstein D, Konichezky M, Sella A, Livne PM, Baniel J. Bladder neck involvement at radical prostatectomy: positive margins or advanced T4 disease? Urology 2000;56:448-52.
14. Buschemeyer WC, III, Hamilton RJ, Aronson WJ, et al. Is a positive bladder neck margin truly a T4 lesion in the prostate specific antigen era? Results from the SEARCH Database. J Urol 2008;179: 124-9.
15. Van den Ouden D, Bentvelsen FM, Boeve ER, Schröder FH. Positive margins after radical prostatectomy: correlation with local recurrence and distant progression. Br J Urol 1993;72:489-94.
16. Epstein JI, Pizov G, Walsh PC. Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Cancer 1993;71: 3582-93.
17. Sofer M, Hamilton-Nelson KL, Civantos F, Soloway MS. Positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatec tomy: the influence of site and number on progression. J Urol 2002;167:2453-6.
18. Ohori M, Abbas F, Wheeler TM, Kattan MW, Scardino PT, Lerner SP. Pathological features and prognostic significance of prostate cancer in the apical section determined by whole mount histology. J Urol 1999;161:500-4.
19. Eastham JA, Kuroiwa K, Ohori M, et al. Prognostic significance of location of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. Urology 2007;70:965-9.
20. Watson RB, Civantos F, Soloway MS. Positive surgical margins with radical prostatectomy: detailed pathological analysis and prognosis. Urology 1996;48:80-90.
21. Pierorazio PM, Epstein JI, Humphreys E, Han M, Walsh PC, Partin AW. The significance of a positive bladder neck margin after radical prostatectomy: the American Joint Committee on Cancer pathological stage T4 designation is not warranted. J Urol 2010; 183:151-7.