Positive surgical margins with radical retropubic prostatectomy: Anatomic site-specific pathologic analysis and impact on prognosis

Urology

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 682-688

  Öbek, Can ^a   Sadek, Samih ^a   Lai, Shenghan ^a   Civantos, Francisco ^a   Rubinowicz, Diego ^a   Soloway, Mark S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANDROGEN; PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DISEASE COURSE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HORMONAL THERAPY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RECURRENT DISEASE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ADENOCARCINOMA; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 17744408950     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00204-6     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Eggleston JC, and Walsh PC: Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: pathological findings in the first 100 cases. J Urol 134: 1146-1148, 1985.
2. Voges GE, McNeal JE, Redwine EA, et al: Morphologic analysis of surgical margins with positive findings in prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Cancer 69: 520-526, 1992.
3. Catalona WJ, and Smith DS: Five year tumor recurrence rates after anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 152: 1837-1842, 1994.
4. Paulson DF: Impact of radical prostatectomy in the management of clinically localized disease. J Urol 152: 1826-1830, 1994.
5. Walsh PC, Partin AW, and Epstein JI: Cancer control and quality of life following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: results at 10 years. J Urol 152: 1831-1836, 1994.
6. Ohori M, Wheeler TM, Kattan MW, et al: Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 154: 1818-1824, 1995.
7. Smith RC, Brendler CB, and Partin AW: Extended follow-up of the influence of whole excision of the neurovascular bundle on prognosis in men with clinically localized prostate cancer (abstract). J Urol 153: 392A, 1995.
8. Epstein JI, Pizov G, and Walsh PC: Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Cancer 71: 3582-3593, 1993.
9. Epstein JI: Evaluation of radical prostatectomy capsular margins of resection. The significance of margins designated as negative, closely approaching and positive. Am J Surg Pathol 14: 626-632, 1990.
10. Stamey TA, Villers AA, McNeal JE, et al: Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: importance of the apical dissection. J Urol 143: 1166-1172, 1990.
11. Richie JP: Management of patients with positive surgical margins following radical prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am 21: 717-723, 1994.
12. Schröder FH, Hermanek P, Denis L, et al: The TNM classification of prostate cancer. Prostate 4: 129-138, 1992.
13. Gomez CA, Soloway MS, Civantos F, et al: Bladder neck preservation and its impact on positive surgical margins during radical prostatectomy. Urology 42: 689-693, 1993.
14. Braslis KG, Petsch M, Lim A, et al: Bladder neck preservation following radical prostatectomy: continence and margins. Eur Urol 28: 202-208, 1995.
15. Shelfo SW, Öbek C, and Soloway MS: Update on bladder neck preservation during radical retropubic prostatectomy: impact on pathologic outcome, anastomotic strictures and continence. Urology 51: 73-78, 1998.
16. True LD: Surgical pathology examination of the prostate gland: practice survey by American Society of Clinical Pathologists. Am J Clin Pathol 102: 572-579, 1994.
17. Hastie TJ, and Tibshirani RT: Generalized additive models. Stat Sci 1: 297-318, 1986.
18. Epstein JI, Partin AW, Sauvageot J, et al: Prediction of progression following radical prostatectomy: a multi-variate analysis of 721 men with long term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol 20: 286-292, 1996.
19. Paulson DF, Stone AR, Walther PJ, et al. Radical prostatectomy: anatomical predictors of success or failure. J Urol 136: 1041-1043, 1986.
20. Stamey TA, Sozen S, and Yemoto CM: Correlation of prostate cancer location, volume and Gleason grade 4/5 with clinical stage Tlc-T2c (abstract). J Urol 157(pt II): 230, 1997.
21. D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, et al: Combined modality staging of prostate carcinoma and its utility in predicting pathologic stage and postoperative prostate specific antigen failure. Urology 49: 23-30, 1997.
22. Partin AW, Borland RN, Epstein JI, et al: Influence of wide excision of the neurovascular bundle(s) on prognosis in men with clinically localized prostate cancer with established capsular penetration.J Urol 150: 142-146, 1993.
23. Walsh PC: Radical retropubic prostatectomy, in Walsh PC, Retik AB, Stamey TA, et al (Eds): Campbell's Urology, 6th ed. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1992, vol 3, pp 2865-2886.
24. Lowe BA, and Lieberman SF: Disease recurrence and progression in untreated pathologic stage T3 prostate cancer: selecting the patient for adjuvant therapy. J Urol 158: 1452-1456, 1997.
25. Watson RB, Civantos F, and Soloway MS: Positive surgical margins with radical prostatectomy: detailed pathological analysis and prognosis. Urology 48: 80-90, 1996.
26. Blute ML, Bostwick DG, Bergstralh EJ, et al: Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy. Urology 50: 733-739, 1997.
27. Arcangeli CG, Smith DS, Catalona WJ, et al: Comparison of surgical margin status for bladder neck sparing vs. traditional radical retropubic prostatectomy (abstract). J Urol 157(suppl): 1526, 1997.
28. Licht MR, Klein EA, Tuason L, et al: Impact of bladder neck preservation during radical prostatectomy on continence and cancer control. Urology 44: 883-887, 1994.
29. Villers A: Extracapsular tumor extension in prostatic cancer: pathways of spread and implications for radical prostatectomy, in Stamey TA (Ed): Monographs in Urology. Montverde, Florida, Medical Directions Publishing, 1994, vol 15, No 4, pp 61-77.