Using complications associated with postmastectomy radiation and immediate breast reconstruction to improve surgical decision making

Archives of Surgery

Volumn 145, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 873-878

  Christante, Dara ^a   Pommier, SuEllen J ^a   Diggs, Brian S ^b   Samuelson, Bethany T ^b   Truong, AiLien ^a   Marquez, Carol ^a   Hansen, Juliana ^a   Naik, Arpana M ^a   Vetto, John T ^a   Pommier, Rodney F ^a  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AXILLARY LYMPH NODE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST ENDOPROSTHESIS; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FOLLOW UP; FROZEN SECTION; GRAFT INFECTION; GRAFT NECROSIS; HEMATOMA; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; IRRADIATION; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY; TREATMENT PLANNING; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; ADJUVANT THERAPY; ADULT; BREAST AUGMENTATION; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; PATHOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; SMOKING; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; THORAX WALL; TIME; TISSUE EXPANDER;

ADULT; BREAST IMPLANTATION; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RADIOTHERAPY, ADJUVANT; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY; SMOKING; THORACIC WALL; TIME FACTORS; TISSUE EXPANSION DEVICES;

EID: 77957025755     PISSN: 00040010     EISSN: 15383644     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.170     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(25):4082-4088.
2. Sorbero ME, Dick AW, Beckjord EB, Ahrendt G. Diagnostic breast magnetic resonance imaging and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(6):1597-1605.
3. McGuire K, Rosenberg AL, Showalter S, Brill KL, Copit S. Timing of sentinel lymph node biopsy and reconstruction for patients undergoing mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;59(4):359-363. (Pubitemid 47494118)
4. Overgaard M, Jensen MB, Overgaard J, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk postmenopausal breast-cancer patients given adjuvant tamoxifen: Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group DBCG 82c randomised trial. Lancet. 1999; 353(9165):1641-1648.
5. Ragaz J, Olivotto IA, Spinelli JJ, et al. Locoregional radiation therapy in patients with high-risk breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy: 20-year results of the British Columbia randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(2):116-126. (Pubitemid 40277091)
6. Overgaard M, Hansen PS, Overgaard J, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy in highrisk premenopausal women with breast cancer who receive adjuvant chemotherapy: Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group 82b Trial. N Engl J Med. 1997; 337(14):949-955.
7. Pomahac B, Recht A, May JW, Hergrueter CA, Slavin SA. New trends in breast cancer management: is the era of immediate breast reconstruction changing? Ann Surg. 2006;244(2):282-288.
8. Motwani SB, Strom EA, Schechter NR, et al. The impact of immediate breast reconstruction on the technical delivery of postmastectomy radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66(1):76-82.
9. Nahabedian MY, Momen B. The impact of breast reconstruction on the oncologic efficacy of radiation therapy: a retrospective analysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2008; 60(3):244-250.
10. Recht A, Edge SB, Solin LJ, et al; American Society of Clinical Oncology. Postmastectomy radiotherapy: clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(5):1539-1569.
11. Silverstein MJ, Skinner KA, Lomis TJ. Predicting axillary nodal positivity in 2282 patients with breast carcinoma. World J Surg. 2001;25(6):767-772. (Pubitemid 32531925)
12. Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Kim HM, Lowery JC. Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109(7):2265-2274.
13. Chagpar AB, Scoggins CR, Martin RC II, et al; University of Louisville Breast Sentinel Lymph Node Study. Predicting patients at low probability of requiring postmastectomy radiation therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(2):670-677.
14. Tran NV, Chang DW, Gupta A, Kroll SS, Robb GL. Comparison of immediate and delayed free TRAM flap breast reconstruction in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108(1):78-82.
15. Jhaveri JD, Rush SC, Kostroff K, et al. Clinical outcomes of postmastectomy radiation therapy after immediate breast reconstruction. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;72(3):859-865.
16. Kronowitz SJ. Immediate versus delayed reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg. 2007; 34(1):39-50.
17. Fine NA, Hirsch EM. Keeping options open for patients with anticipated postmastectomy chest wall irradiation: immediate tissue expansion followed by reconstruction of choice. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123(1):25-29.
18. Huang CJ, Hou MF, Lin SD, et al. Comparison of local recurrence and distant metastases between breast cancer patients after postmastectomy radiotherapy with and without immediate TRAM flap reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 118(5):1079-1086, discussion 1087-1088.
19. Spear SL, Newman MK, Bedford MS, Schwartz KA, Cohen M, Schwartz JS. A retrospective analysis of outcomes using three common methods for immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(2):340-347.
20. Reavey P, McCarthy CM. Update on breast reconstruction in breast cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008;20(1):61-67.
21. Spear SL, Ducic I, Low M, Cuoco F. The effect of radiation on pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction: outcomes and implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 115(1):84-95. (Pubitemid 40187801)
22. Van Zee KJ, Manasseh DM, Bevilacqua JL, et al. A nomogram for predicting the likelihood of additional nodal metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10(10):1140-1151.
23. Wilke LG, McCall LM, Posther KE, et al. Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy: results from a prospective international cooperative group trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13(4):491-500.
24. Smidt ML, Janssen CM, Barendregt WB, Wobbes T, Strobbe LJ. Sentinel lymph node biopsy performed under local anesthesia is feasible. Am J Surg. 2004; 187(6):684-687.
25. Rivers AK, Griffith KA, Hunt KK, et al. Clinicopathologic features associated with having four or more metastatic axillary nodes in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13(1):36-44.