메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 20, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 88-93

Validity of a verbally administered numeric rating scale to measure cancer pain intensity

Author keywords

Measurement; Numeric rating scale; Pain; Simple descriptor scale; Visual analog scale

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER PAIN; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; NURSING; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; RATING SCALE; SELF REPORT; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

EID: 0030906886     PISSN: 0162220X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00002820-199704000-00002     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (359)

References (31)
  • 2
    • 0019460984 scopus 로고
    • Measurement of pain: Patient preference does not confound pain measurement
    • Kremer E, Atkinson, JH, Ingelzi RJ. Measurement of pain: patient preference does not confound pain measurement Pain 1981;10: 241-8.
    • (1981) Pain , vol.10 , pp. 241-248
    • Kremer, E.1    Atkinson, J.H.2    Ingelzi, R.J.3
  • 4
    • 0022911339 scopus 로고
    • Assessing pain among oncology and terminally ill patients: Psychometric considerations
    • Turk DE, Rudy DC. Assessing pain among oncology and terminally ill patients: psychometric considerations. Hospice J 1986;2:61-73.
    • (1986) Hospice J , vol.2 , pp. 61-73
    • De Turk1    Rudy, D.C.2
  • 5
    • 0021260963 scopus 로고
    • Cancer-related pain. II: Assessment with visual analogue scales
    • Ahles TA, Tuckdeschel JC, Blanchard EB. Cancer-related pain. II. Assessment with visual analogue scales. J Psychosom Res 1984;28:121-4.
    • (1984) J Psychosom Res , vol.28 , pp. 121-124
    • Ahles, T.A.1    Tuckdeschel, J.C.2    Blanchard, E.B.3
  • 6
    • 0016646010 scopus 로고
    • Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: A comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale
    • Ohnhaus EE, Adler R. Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: a comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale. Pain 1975;1:379-84.
    • (1975) Pain , vol.1 , pp. 379-384
    • Ohnhaus, E.E.1    Adler, R.2
  • 7
    • 0016291108 scopus 로고
    • Measurement of pain
    • Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet 1974;2:1127-31.
    • (1974) Lancet , vol.2 , pp. 1127-1131
    • Huskisson, E.C.1
  • 8
    • 0018715139 scopus 로고
    • Vertical or horizontal visual analogue scales
    • Scott J, Huskisson EC. Vertical or horizontal visual analogue scales. Ann Rheum Dis 1979;38:560.
    • (1979) Ann Rheum Dis , vol.38 , pp. 560
    • Scott, J.1    Huskisson, E.C.2
  • 9
    • 0017143694 scopus 로고
    • Graphic representation of pain
    • Scott J, Huskisson EC. Graphic representation of pain. Pain 1976; 2:175-84.
    • (1976) Pain , vol.2 , pp. 175-184
    • Scott, J.1    Huskisson, E.C.2
  • 10
    • 0028012690 scopus 로고
    • A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales
    • Price DD, Bush FM, Long S, et al. A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales. Pain 1994;56:217-26.
    • (1994) Pain , vol.56 , pp. 217-226
    • Price, D.D.1    Bush, F.M.2    Long, S.3
  • 11
    • 0026691867 scopus 로고
    • A comparison of the Hopkins Pain Rating Instrument with standard visual analogue and verbal descriptor scales in patients with cancer pain
    • Grossman SA, Sheidler VR, McGuire DB, et al. A comparison of the Hopkins Pain Rating Instrument with standard visual analogue and verbal descriptor scales in patients with cancer pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 1992;7:196-203.
    • (1992) J Pain Symptom Manage , vol.7 , pp. 196-203
    • Grossman, S.A.1    Sheidler, V.R.2    McGuire, D.B.3
  • 12
    • 0016840488 scopus 로고
    • Comparison of fixed interval and visual analogue scales for rating chronic pain
    • Joyce CRB, Zutshi DW, Hrubes V, et al. Comparison of fixed interval and visual analogue scales for rating chronic pain. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1975;8:415-20.
    • (1975) Eur J Clin Pharmacol , vol.8 , pp. 415-420
    • Joyce, C.1    Zutshi, D.W.2    Hrubes, V.3
  • 13
    • 0017192898 scopus 로고
    • The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain
    • Revill SI, Robinson JO, Rosen M, et al. The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia 1976;31:1191-8.
    • (1976) Anaesthesia , vol.31 , pp. 1191-1198
    • Revill, S.I.1    Robinson, J.O.2    Rosen, M.3
  • 14
    • 0022467080 scopus 로고
    • The measurement of clinical pain intensity: A comparison of six methods
    • Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain 1986;27:117-26.
    • (1986) Pain , vol.27 , pp. 117-126
    • Jensen, M.P.1    Karoly, P.2    Braver, S.3
  • 15
    • 0020273463 scopus 로고
    • The quantification of pain: An analysis of words used to describe pain and analgesia in clinical trials
    • Sriwatanakul K, Kelvie W, Lasagna L.The quantification of pain: an analysis of words used to describe pain and analgesia in clinical trials. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1982;32:143-8.
    • (1982) Clin Pharmacol Ther , vol.32 , pp. 143-148
    • Sriwatanakul, K.1    Kelvie, W.2    Lasagna, L.3
  • 17
    • 0020565258 scopus 로고
    • The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain
    • Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckingham B, The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain 1983;17:45-56.
    • (1983) Pain , vol.17 , pp. 45-56
    • Price, D.D.1    McGrath, P.A.2    Rafii, A.3    Buckingham, B.4
  • 18
    • 0002062454 scopus 로고
    • Measurement of clinical pain: A review and integration of research findings
    • Benedetti C, Chapman CR, Moricca G, eds. New York: Raven Press
    • Syrjala KL, Chapman CR. Measurement of clinical pain: a review and integration of research findings. In: Benedetti C, Chapman CR, Moricca G, eds. Advances in pain research and therapy, vol. 7. New York: Raven Press. 1984:71-97.
    • (1984) Advances in Pain Research and Therapy , vol.7 , pp. 71-97
    • Syrjala, K.L.1    Chapman, C.R.2
  • 19
    • 0024465922 scopus 로고
    • Visual analogue scales: Measurement of subjective phenomena
    • Gift AG. Visual analogue scales: measurement of subjective phenomena. Nurs Res 1989;38:286-9.
    • (1989) Nurs Res , vol.38 , pp. 286-289
    • Gift, A.G.1
  • 20
    • 0024336991 scopus 로고
    • The subjective experience of acute pain: An assessment of the utility of 10 indices
    • Jensen MP, Karoly P, O'Riordan EF, et al. The subjective experience of acute pain: an assessment of the utility of 10 indices. Clin J Pain 1989;5:153-9.
    • (1989) Clin J Pain , vol.5 , pp. 153-159
    • Jensen, M.P.1    Karoly, P.2    O'Riordan, E.F.3
  • 21
    • 0027936298 scopus 로고
    • What is the maximum number of levels needed in pain intensity measurement?
    • Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM. What is the maximum number of levels needed in pain intensity measurement? Pain 1994;58:387-92.
    • (1994) Pain , vol.58 , pp. 387-392
    • Jensen, M.P.1    Turner, J.A.2    Romano, J.M.3
  • 22
    • 0029127334 scopus 로고
    • Comparison of patients ratings and examination of nurses responses to pain intensity rating scales
    • Carpenter JS, Brockopp D. Comparison of patients ratings and examination of nurses responses to pain intensity rating scales. Cancer Nurs 1995;18:292-8.
    • (1995) Cancer Nurs , vol.18 , pp. 292-298
    • Carpenter, J.S.1    Brockopp, D.2
  • 23
    • 0023546554 scopus 로고
    • Measurement of pain: A comparison of the visual analogue scale with a nonvisual analogue scale
    • Murphy DF, McDonald A. Power C, et al. Measurement of pain: a comparison of the visual analogue scale with a nonvisual analogue scale. Clin J Pain 1988;3:197-9.
    • (1988) Clin J Pain , vol.3 , pp. 197-199
    • Murphy, D.F.1    McDonald, A.2    Power, C.3
  • 24
    • 0025051047 scopus 로고
    • Cancer pain intensin measurement: Concurrent validity of three tools-finger dynamometer, pain intensity number scale, xisual analogue scale
    • Wilkie D, Lovejoy N, Dodd M, et al. Cancer pain intensin measurement: concurrent validity of three tools-finger dynamometer, pain intensity number scale, xisual analogue scale. Hospice J 1990;6:1-13.
    • (1990) Hospice J , vol.6 , pp. 1-13
    • Wilkie, D.1    Lovejoy, N.2    Dodd, M.3
  • 25
    • 0016725211 scopus 로고
    • The McGill pain questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods
    • Melzak R. The McGill pain questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1975;1:277-99.
    • (1975) Pain , vol.1 , pp. 277-299
    • Melzak, R.1
  • 26
    • 0023687715 scopus 로고
    • Pain measurement in randomized clinical trials: A comparison of two pain scales
    • Machin D, Lewith GT, Wylson S. Pain measurement in randomized clinical trials: a comparison of two pain scales. Clin J Pain 1988;4:161-8.
    • (1988) Clin J Pain , vol.4 , pp. 161-168
    • Machin, D.1    Lewith, G.T.2    Wylson, S.3
  • 27
    • 0021795389 scopus 로고
    • Pain measurement: An overview
    • Chapman CR, Casey KL, Dubner R, et al. Pain measurement: an overview. Pain 1985;22:1-31.
    • (1985) Pain , vol.22 , pp. 1-31
    • Chapman, C.R.1    Casey, K.L.2    Dubner, R.3
  • 28
    • 0001959851 scopus 로고
    • Cancer pain: Principles of assessment and syndromes
    • Wall PD. Melzack R. eds. London: Churchill Livingstone
    • Cherny NI, Portenoy RK. Cancer pain: principles of assessment and syndromes, in: Wall PD. Melzack R. eds. Textbook of pain- 3rd ed. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1994:787-823.
    • (1994) Textbook of Pain- 3rd Ed. , pp. 787-823
    • Cherny, N.I.1    Portenoy, R.K.2
  • 29
    • 0023914638 scopus 로고
    • Assessment of adult cancer pain: Shortcomings of current methods
    • Deschamps M, Band PR, Coldman AJ. Assessment of adult cancer pain: shortcomings of current methods. Pain 1988;32:133-9.
    • (1988) Pain , vol.32 , pp. 133-139
    • Deschamps, M.1    Band, P.R.2    Coldman, A.J.3
  • 31
    • 0021244554 scopus 로고
    • The measurement of clinical pain
    • McGuire DB. the measurement of clinical pain. Nurs Res 1984;33:152-6.
    • (1984) Nurs Res , vol.33 , pp. 152-156
    • McGuire, D.B.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.