TIRfinder: A web tool for mining class II transposons carrying terminal inverted repeats

Evolutionary Bioinformatics

Volumn 2013, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 17-27

  Gambin, Tomasz ^a   Startek, Michał ^b   Wwalczak, Krzysztof ^a   Paszek, Jarosław ^b   Grzebelus, Dariusz ^c   Gambin, Anna ^b,d  

^a WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE IN KRAKOW   (Poland)

^d MOSSAKOWSKI MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTRE   (Poland)

Author keywords

Comparative genomics; Suffix tree; Terminal inverted repeat; Transposon

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; DNA;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS LYRATA; BARREL MEDIC; DNA STRUCTURE; GENE SEQUENCE; INTERNET; INVERTED REPEAT; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; OPEN READING FRAME; PLANT GENOME; RETROPOSON; REVIEW; RICE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; TRANSPOSON;

EID: 84873343262     PISSN: 11769343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4137/EBO.S10619     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. de Koning AP, Gu W, Castoe TA, Batzer MA, Pollock DD. Repetitive elements may comprise over two-thirds of the human genome. PLoS Genet. Dec 2011;7(12):e1002384. Epub Dec 1, 2011.
2. Schnable PS, Ware D, Fulton RS, et al. The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science. Nov 20, 2009;326(5956):1112-5.
3. Kapitonov VV, Jurka J. A universal classification of eukaryotic transposable elements implemented in Repbase. Nat Rev Genet. May 2008;9(5):411-2; author reply 414.
4. Wicker T, Sabot F, Hua-Van A, et al. A unified classification system for eukaryotic transposable elements. Nat Rev Genet. Dec 2007;8(12):973-82.
5. Britten RJ. Transposable element insertions have strongly affected human evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Nov 16, 2010;107(46):19945-8. Epub Nov 1, 2010.
6. Bergman CM, Quesneville H. Discovering and detecting transposable elementsin genome sequences. Brief Bioinform. Nov 2007;8(6):382-92. Epub Oct 10, 2007.
7. Du C, Caronna J, He L, Dooner H. Computational prediction and molecular confirmation of Helitron transposons in the maize genome. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:51.
8. Ellinghaus D, Kurtz S, Willhoeft U. LTRharvest, an efficient and flexible software for de novo detection of LTR retrotransposons. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:18.
9. Kurtz S, Schleiermacher C. REPuter: fast computation of maximal repeats in complete genomes. Bioinformatics. May 1999;15(5):426-7.
10. Bao Z, Eddy SR. Automated de novo identification of Repeat Sequence families in sequenced genomes. Genome Res. 2002;12(8):1269-76.
11. Warburton PE, Giordano J, Cheung F, Gelfand Y, Benson G. Inverted repeat structure of the human genome: the X-chromosome contains a preponderance of large, highly homologous inverted repeats that contain testes genes. Genome Res. Oct 2004;14(10A):1861-9.
12. Yang G, Hall TC. MAK, a computational tool kit for automated MITE analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. Jul 1, 2003;31(13):3659-65.
13. Han Y, Wessler SR. MITE-Hunter: a program for discovering miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements from genomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. Dec 2010;38(22):e199. Epub Sep 29, 2010.
14. Chen Y, Zhou F, Li G, Xu Y. MUST: a system for identification of miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements and applications to Anabaena variabilis and Haloquadratum walsbyi. Gene. May 1, 2009;436(1-2):1-7. Epub Feb 10, 2009.
15. Nicolas J, Durand P, Ranchy G, Tempel S, Valin AS. Suffix-tree analyser (STAN): looking for nucleotidic and peptidic patterns in chromosomes. Bioinformatics. Dec 15, 2005;21(24):4408-10. Epub Oct 13, 2005.
16. Santiago N, Herráiz C, Goñi JR, Messeguer X, Casacuberta JM. Genome-wide analysis of the Emigrant family of MITEs of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Biol Evol. Dec 2002;19(12):2285-93.
17. Cornish-Bowden A. Nomenclature for incompletely specified bases in nucleic acid sequences: recommendations 1984. Nucleic Acids Res. May 10, 1985;13(9):3021-30.
18. Grzebelus D, Lasota S, Gambin T, Kucherov G, Gambin A. Diversity and structure of PIF/Harbinger-like elements in the genome of Medicago truncatula. BMC Genomics. Nov 9, 2007;8:409.
19. Grzebelus D, Gładysz M, Macko-Podgórni A, et al. Population dynamics of miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) in Medicago Gene. Dec 15, 2009;448(2):214-20. Epub Jun 17, 2009.
20. Novák P, Neumann P, Macas J. Graph-based clustering and characterization of repetitive sequences in next-generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics. Jul 15, 2010;11:378.
21. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. Oct 5, 1990;215(3):403-10.
22. Le QH, Wright S, Yu Z, Bureau T. Transposon diversity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jun 20, 2000;97(13):7376-81.
23. Jurka J, Kapitonov VV, Pavlicek A, Klonowski P, Kohany O, Walichiewicz J. Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;110(1-4):462-7.
24. Guermonprez H, Loot C, Casacuberta JM. Different strategies to persist: the pogo-like Lemi1 transposon produces miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements or typical defective elements in different plant genomes. Genetics. Sep 2008;180(1):83-92. Epub Aug 30, 2008.