Overcoming limitations of the ERP method with Residue Iteration Decomposition (RIDE): A demonstration in go/no-go experiments

Psychophysiology

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 253-265

  Ouyang, Guang ^a   Schacht, Annekathrin ^b   Zhou, Changsong ^a   Sommer, Werner ^c  

^a HONG KONG BAPTIST UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^c HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

ERP; ERP subtraction difference waves; Go no go paradigm; No go N2; No go P3

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873324084     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12004     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Azizian, A., Freitas, A. L., Parvaz, M. A., & Squires, N. K. (2006). Beware misleading cues: Perceptual similarity modulates the N2/P3 complex. Psychophysiology, 43, 253-260. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00409.x.
2. Beste, C., Willemssen, R., Saft, C., & Falkenstein, M. (2010). Response inhibition subprocesses and dopaminergic pathways: Basal ganglia disease effects. Neuropsychologia, 48, 366-373. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.023.
3. Bokura, H., Yamaguchi, S., & Kobayashi, S. (2001). Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a go/nogo task. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112, 2224-2232. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00691-5.
4. Bruin, K., & Wijers, A. (2002). Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: A comparative event-related potential study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 1172-1182. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00141-4.
5. Czigler, I., Csibra, G., & Ambró, Á. (1996). Aging, stimulus identification and the effect of probability: An event-related potential study. Biological Psychology, 43, 27-40. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(95)05173-2.
6. Dandekar, S., Privitera, C., Carney, T., & Klein, S. A. (2012). Neural saccadic response estimation during natural viewing. Journal of Neurophysiology, 107, 1776-1790. doi: 10.1152/jn.00237.2011.
7. Dockree, P. M., Kelly, S. P., Robertson, I. H., Reilly, R. B., & Foxe, J. J. (2005). Neurophysiological markers of alert responding during goal-directed behavior: A high-density electrical mapping study. NeuroImage, 27, 587-601. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.044.
8. Donchin, E., Ritter, W., & McCallum, C. (1978). Cognitive psychophysiology: The endogenous components of the ERP. In E. Callaway, P. Tueting, & S. Koslow (Eds.), Brain event-related potentials in man (pp. 349-441). New York: Academic Press.
9. Donders, F. C. (1969). Over de snelheid van psychische processen [On the speed of mental processes] (W. G. Koster, trans.). Acta Psychologica, 30, 412-431 (Originally published 1868).
10. Easdon, C., Izenberg, A., Armilio, M. L., Yu, H., & Alain, C. (2005). Alcohol consumption impairs stimulus- and error-related processing during a go/no-go task. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 873-883. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.09.009.
11. Eimer, M. (1993). Effects of attention and stimulus probability on ERPs in a go/no-go task. Biological Psychology, 35, 123-138. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(93)90009-W.
12. Enriquez-Geppert, S., Konrad, C., Pantev, C., & Huster, R. J. (2010). Conflict and inhibition differentially affect the N200/P300 complex in a combined go/nogo and stop-signal task. NeuroImage, 51, 877-887. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.043.
13. Fabiani, M., Gratton, G., & Federmeier, K. D. (2007). Event-related brain potentials: Methods, theory, and applications. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (3rd ed.) (pp. 85-119). New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., & Hohnsbein, J. (1999). ERP components in go/no-go tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychologica, 101, 267-291. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00008-6.
15. Folstein, J. R., & Van Petten, C. (2008). Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: A review. Psychophysiology, 45, 152-170. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00602.x.
16. Goldstein, A., Spencer, K. M., & Donchin, E. (2002). The influence of stimulus deviance and novelty on the P300 and novelty P3. Psychophysiology, 39, 781-790. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3960781.
17. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1989). A procedure for using multi-electrode information in the analysis of components of the event-related potential: Vector filter. Psychophysiology, 26, 222-232. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1989.tb03160.x.
18. Handy, T. C. (2005). Event-related potentials: A methods handbook. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Hughes, G., Velmans, M., & De Fockert, J. (2009). Unconscious priming of a no-go response. Psychophysiology, 46, 1258-1269. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00873.x.
20. Huster, R., Westerhausen, R., Pantev, C., & Konrad, C. (2010). The role of the cingulate cortex as neural generator of the N200 and P300 in a tactile response inhibition task. Human Brain Mapping, 31, 1260-1271. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20933.
21. Jodo, E., & Kayama, Y. (1992). Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a go/no-go task. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 82, 477-482. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(92)90054-L.
22. Johnson, R., Jr. (1986). A triarchic model of P300 amplitude. Psychophysiology, 23, 367-384. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00649.x.
23. Jonkman, L., Sniedt, F., & Kemner, C. (2007). Source localization of the nogo-N2: A developmental study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 1069-1077. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.01.017.
24. Kiefer, M., Marzinzik, F., Weisbrod, M., Scherg, M., & Spitzer, M. (1998). The time course of brain activations during response inhibition: Evidence from event-related potentials in a go no go task. NeuroReport, 9, 765-770. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199803090-00037.
25. Kirmizi-Alsan, E., Bayraktaroglu, Z., Gurvit, H., Keskin, Y. H., Emre, M., & Demiralp, T. (2006). Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during go/nogo and CPT: Decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention. Brain Research, 1104, 114-128. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.03.010.
26. Kropotov, J. D., & Ponomarev, V. A. (2009). Decomposing N2 NOGO wave of event-related potentials into independent components. NeuroReport, 20, 1592-1596. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283309cbd.
27. Kropotov, J. D., Ponomarev, V. A., Hollup, S., & Mueller, A. (2011). Dissociating action inhibition, conflict monitoring and sensory mismatch into independent components of event related potentials in GO/NOGO task. NeuroImage, 57, 565-575. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.060.
28. Kutas, M., McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1977). Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science, 197, 792-795. doi: 10.1126/science.887923.
29. Lavric, A., Pizzagalli, D. A., & Forstmeier, S. (2004). When 'go'and 'nogo' are equally frequent: ERP components and cortical tomography. European Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 2483-2488. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03683.x.
30. Makeig, S., Bell, A. J., Jung, T. P., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1996). Independent component analysis of electroencephalographic data. In G. Tesauro, D. S. Touretzky, & T. Leen (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 145-151). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Makeig, S., Debener, S., Onton, J., & Delorme, A. (2004). Mining event-related brain dynamics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 204-210. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.03.008.
32. Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T., & Alho, K. (2007). The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2544-2590. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.026.
33. Nakata, H., Inui, K., Wasaka, T., Tamura, Y., Kida, T., & Kakigi, R. (2005). Effects of ISI and stimulus probability on event-related go/nogo potentials after somatosensory stimulation. Experimental Brain Research, 162, 293-299. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-2195-4.
34. Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., Van Den Wildenberg, W., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2003). Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 17-26. doi: 10.3758/CABN.3.1.17.
35. Ocklenburg, S., Gunturkun, O., & Beste, C. (2011). Lateralized neural mechanisms underlying the modulation of response inhibition processes. NeuroImage, 55, 1771-1778. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.035.
36. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4.
37. Ouyang, G., Herzmann, G., Zhou, C., & Sommer, W. (2011). Residue Iteration Decomposition (RIDE): A new method to separate ERP components on the basis of latency variability in single trials. Psychophysiology, 48, 1631-1647. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01269.x.
38. Pivik, R., Broughton, R., Coppola, R., Davidson, R., Fox, N., & Nuwer, M. (1993). Guidelines for the recording and quantitative analysis of electroencephalographic activity in research contexts. Psychophysiology, 30, 547-558. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb02081.x.
39. Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2128-2148. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019.
40. Ritter, W., Simson, R., Vaughan, H. G., Jr., & Macht, M. (1982). Manipulation of event-related potential manifestations of information processing stages. Science, 218, 909-911. doi: 10.1126/science.7134983.
41. Schacht, A., Dimigen, O., & Sommer, W. (2010). Emotions in cognitive conflicts are not aversive but are task specific. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 10, 349-356. doi: 10.3758/CABN.10.3.349.
42. Simons, R. F., Graham, F. K., Miles, M. A., & Chen, X. (2001). On the relationship of P3a and the Novelty-P3. Biological Psychology, 56, 207-218. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0511(01)00078-3.
43. Smith, J. L., Johnstone, S. J., & Barry, R. J. (2007). Response priming in the go/nogo task: The N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 343-355. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.09.027.
44. Smith, J. L., Smith, E. A., Provost, A. L, & Heathcote, A. (2009). Sequence effects support the conflict theory of N2 and P3 in the go/nogo task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 75, 217-226. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.11.002.
45. Takeda, Y., Sato, M., Yamanaka, K., Nozaki, D., & Yamamoto, Y. (2010). A generalized method to estimate waveforms common across trials from EEGs. NeuroImage, 51, 629-641. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.002.
46. Takeda, Y., Yamanaka, K., & Yamamoto, Y. (2008). Temporal decomposition of EEG during a simple reaction time task into stimulus- and response-locked components. NeuroImage, 39, 742-754. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.003.
47. Van Veen, V., & Carter, C. S. (2002). The timing of action-monitoring processes in the anterior cingulate cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 593-602. doi: 10.1162/08989290260045837.
48. Verleger, R. (1997). On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. Psychophysiology, 34, 131-156. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02125.x.
49. Walhovd, K. B., Rosquist, H., & Fjell, A. M. (2008). P300 amplitude age reductions are not caused by latency jitter. Psychophysiology, 45, 545-553. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00661.x.
50. Wild-Wall, N., Oades, R. D., Schmidt-Wessels, M., Christiansen, H., & Falkenstein, M. (2009). Neural activity associated with executive functions in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). International Journal of Psychophysiology, 74, 19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.06.003.
51. Woldorff, M. G. (1993). Distortion of ERP averages due to overlap from temporally adjacent ERPs: Analysis and correction. Psychophysiology, 30, 98-119. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb03209.x.
52. Woody, C. D. (1967). Characterization of an adaptive filter for the analysis of variable latency neuroelectric signals. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 5, 539-554. doi: 10.1007/BF02474247.
53. Zhang, J. (1998). Decomposing stimulus and response component waveforms in ERP. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 80, 49-63. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0270(97)00194-5.
54. Zhang, Q., & Damian, M. (2009). The time course of segment and tone encoding in Chinese spoken production: An event-related potential study. Neuroscience, 163, 252-265. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.06.015.