Soft-tissue mobility of the lower face depending on positional changes and age: A three-dimensional morphometric surface analysis

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 131, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 372-381

  Iblher, Niklas ^a,b   Gladilin, Evgeny ^a,b   Stark, Björn G ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b BonaForma   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; FACE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; FACE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; POSTURE; YOUNG ADULT;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84873303216     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318278d67c     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Markiewicz MR, Bell RB. The use of 3D imaging tools in facial plastic surgery. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2011;19:655-682, ix.
2. Calignano F, Vezzetti E. A morphological methodology for three-dimensional human face soft-tissue landmarks extraction: A preliminary study. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011;35:289-302.
3. Mendelson B, Wong CH. Changes in the facial skeleton with aging: Implications and clinical applications in facial rejuvenation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012;36:753-760.
4. Albert AM, Ricanek K Jr, Patterson E. A review of the literature on the aging adult skull and face: Implications for forensic science research and applications. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;172:1-9. (Pubitemid 47223600)
5. Pessa JE. An algorithm of facial aging: Verification of Lambros's theory by three-dimensional stereolithography, with reference to the pathogenesis of midfacial aging, scleral show, and the lateral suborbital trough deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:479-488; discussion 489-490. (Pubitemid 30640478)
6. Kovacs L, Zimmermann A, Brockmann G, et al. Three-dimensional recording of the human face with a 3D laser scanner. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59:1193-1202. (Pubitemid 44542637)
7. Riphagen JM, van Neck JW, van Adrichem LN. 3D surface imaging in medicine: A review of working principles and implications for imaging the unsedated child. J Craniofac Surg. 2008;19:517-524. (Pubitemid 351521696)
8. Tzou CH, Frey M. Evolution of 3D surface imaging systems in facial plastic surgery. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2011; 19:591-602, vii.
9. Aldridge K, Boyadjiev SA, Capone GT, DeLeon VB, Richtsmeier JT. Precision and error of three-dimensional phenotypic measures acquired from 3dMD photogrammetric images. Am J Med Genet A 2005;138:247-253. (Pubitemid 41384241)
10. Aung SC, Ngim RC, Lee ST. Evaluation of the laser scanner as a surface measuring tool and its accuracy compared with direct facial anthropometric measurements. Br J Plast Surg. 1995;48:551-558.
11. Kusnoto B, Evans CA. Reliability of a 3D surface laser scanner for orthodontic applications. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;122:342-348. (Pubitemid 40432951)
12. Lübbers HT, Medinger L, Kruse A, Grätz KW, Matthews F. Precision and accuracy of the 3dMD photogrammetric system in craniomaxillofacial application. J Craniofac Surg. 2010; 21:763-767.
13. Weinberg SM, Naidoo S, Govier DP, Martin RA, Kane AA, Marazita ML. Anthropometric precision and accuracy of digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: Comparing the Genex and 3dMD imaging systems with one another and with direct anthropometry. J Craniofac Surg. 2006;17: 477-483. (Pubitemid 44314843)
14. Khambay B, Nairn N, Bell A, Miller J, Bowman A, Ayoub AF. Validation and reproducibility of a high-resolution threedimensional facial imaging system. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;46:27-32. (Pubitemid 350266138)
15. Schwenzer-Zimmerer K, Chaitidis D, Berg-Boerner I, et al. Quantitative 3D soft tissue analysis of symmetry prior to and after unilateral cleft lip repair compared with non-cleft persons (performed in Cambodia). J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2008; 36:431-438.
16. Tzou CH, Pona I, Placheta E, et al. Evolution of the 3-dimensional video system for facial motion analysis: Ten years' experiences and recent developments. Ann Plast Surg. 2012; 69:173-185.
17. Iblher N, Stark GB, Penna V. The aging perioral region: Do we really know what is happening. J Nutr Health Aging 2012; 16:581-585.
18. Vannier MW, Pilgram TK, Bhatia G, Brunsden B, Nemecek JR, Young VL. Quantitative three-dimensional assessment of face-lift with an optical facial surface scanner. Ann Plast Surg. 1993;30:204-211. (Pubitemid 23100357)
19. Coleman SR, Grover R. The anatomy of the aging face: Volume loss and changes in 3-dimensional topography. Aesthet Surg J. 2006;26:S4-S9. (Pubitemid 43323628)
20. Friedman O. Changes associated with the aging face. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2005;13:371-380. (Pubitemid 41110310)
21. Kahn DM, Shaw RB. Overview of current thoughts on facial volume and aging. Facial Plast Surg. 2010;26:350-355.
22. Alpert BS, Baker DC, Hamra ST, Owsley JQ, Ramirez O. Identical twin face lifts with differing techniques: A 10-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:1025-1033; discussion 1034-1036.
23. Mazza E, Barbarino GG. 3D mechanical modeling of facial soft tissue for surgery simulation. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2011;19:623-637, viii.
24. Ohshima H, Kinoshita S, Oyobikawa M, et al. Use of Cutometer area parameters in evaluating age-related changes in the skin elasticity of the cheek. Skin Res Technol. Epublished ahead of print May 31, 2012.