Multiple object individuation during numerical Stroop

Psychophysiology

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 292-296

  Pagano, Silvia ^a   Mazza, Veronica ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

Author keywords

ERP; Individuation; N2pc; Numerical Stroop

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873282924     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12014     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Cavanagh, P., & He, S. (2011). Attention mechanisms for counting in stabilized and in dynamic displays. In E. M. Brannon and S. Dehaene (Eds.), Space time and number, attention & performance XXIV. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2. Dell'Acqua, R., Pesciarelli, F., Jolicœur, P., Eimer, M., & Peressotti, F. (2007). The interdependence of spatial attention and lexical access as revealed by early asymmetries in occipito-parietal ERP activity. Psychophysiology, 44, 436-443. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00514.x.
3. Eger, E., Sterzer, P., Russ, M. O., Giraud, A.-L., & Kleinschmidt, A. (2003). A supramodal number representation in human intraparietal cortex. Neuron, 37, 719-726. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00036-9.
4. Eimer, M. (1996). The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99, 225-234. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(96)95711-9.
5. Ester, E. F., Drew, T., Klee, D., Vogel, E. K., & Awh, E. (2012). Neural measures reveal a fixed item limit in subitizing. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 7169-7177. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1218-12.2012.
6. Francolini, C. M., & Egeth, H. E. (1980). On the nonautomaticity of "automatic" activation: Evidence of selective seeing. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 331-342. doi: 10.3758/BF03206122.
7. Hickey, C., Di Lollo, V., & McDonald, J. J. (2009). Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 760-775. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21039.
8. Jolicœur, P., Sessa, P., Dell'Acqua, R., & Robitaille, N. (2006). On the control of visual spatial attention: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Psychological Research, 70, 414-424. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0008-4.
9. Kappenman, E. S., & Luck, S. J. (2012). Manipulation of orthogonal neural systems together in electrophysiological recordings: The MONSTER approach to simultaneous assessment of multiple neurocognitive dimensions. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 38, 92-102. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbr147.
10. Kaufman, E. L., Lord, M. W., Reese, T. W., & Volkmann, J. (1949). The discrimination of visual number. American Journal of Psychology, 62, 498-525. doi: 10.2307/1418556.
11. Luck, S. J., Girelli, M., McDermott, M. T., & Ford, M. A. (1997). Bridging the gap between monkey neurophysiology and human perception: An ambiguity resolution theory of visual selective attention. Cognitive Psychology, 33, 64-87. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1997.0660.
12. Mandler, G., & Shebo, B. J. (1982). Subitizing: An analysis of its component processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 1-22. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.111.1.1.
13. Masson, M. E. J. (2011). A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 679-690. doi: 10.3758/s13428-010-0049-5.
14. Mazza, V., & Caramazza, A. (2011). Temporal brain dynamics of multiple object processing: The flexibility of individuation. PloS One, 6, e17453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017453.
15. Mazza, V., Turatto, M., & Caramazza, A. (2009). An electrophysiological assessment of distractor suppression in visual search tasks. Psychophysiology, 46, 771-775. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00814.x.
16. Pagano, S., & Mazza, V. (2012). Individuation of multiple targets during visual enumeration: New insights from electrophysiology. Neuropsychologia, 50, 754-761. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.01.009.
17. Pavese, A., & Umiltà, C. (1998). Symbolic distance between numerosity and identity modulates Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1535-1545. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.5.1535.
18. Piazza, M., Izard, V., Pinel, P., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Tuning curves for approximate numerosity in the human intraparietal sulcus. Neuron, 44, 547-555. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.10.014.
19. Robitaille, N., Marois, R., Todd, J. J., Grimault, S., Cheyne, D., & Jolicœur, P. (2010). Distinguishing between lateralized and nonlateralized brain activity associated with visual short-term memory: fMRI, MEG, and EEG evidence from the same observers. NeuroImage, 53, 1334-1345. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.027.
20. Telling, A. L., Kumar, S., Meyer, A. S., & Humphreys, G. W. (2010). Electrophysiological evidence of semantic interference in visual search. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2212-2225. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21348.
21. Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381, 520-522. doi: 10.1038/381520a0.
22. Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1993). What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: Evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 331-351. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.19.2.331.
23. Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review, 101, 80-102. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.80.
24. Vogel, E. K., & Machizawa, M. G. (2004). Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature, 428, 748-751. doi: 10.1038/nature02447.