Attention Mechanisms for Counting in Stabilized and in Dynamic Displays

Space, Time and Number in the Brain

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 23-35

  Cavanagh, Patrick ^a   He, Sheng ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882839498     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385948-8.00003-7     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. Dehaene S. The Number Sense 1997, Oxford University Press, New York.
2. Jevons W. The power of numerical discrimination. Nature 1871, 3:281-282.
3. Atkinson J., Campbell F.W., Francis M.R. The Magic Number 4±0: a new look at visual numerosity judgements. Perception 1976, 5(3):327-334.
4. Jensen E.M., Reese E.P., Reese T.W. The subitizing and counting of visually presented fields of dots. J. Psychol. 1950, 30:363-392.
5. Kaufman E.L., Lord M.W., Reese T.W., Volkmann J. The discrimination of visual number. Am. J. Psychol. 1949, 62:498-525.
6. Trick L.M., Pylyshyn Z.W. Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychol. Rev. 1994, 101(1):80-102.
7. Klahr D. A production system for counting, subitizing, and adding. Visual Information Processing 1973, 527-546. Academic Press, New York. W.G. Chase (Ed.).
8. Ullman S. Visual routines. Cognition 1984, 18(1-3):97-159.
9. Cavanagh P., Hunt A., Afraz A., Rolfs M. Visual stability based on remapping of attention pointers. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2010, 14:147-153.
10. Simon T.J., Vaishnavi S. Subitizing and counting depend on different attentional mechanisms: evidence from visual enumeration in afterimages. Percept. Psychophys. 1996, 58(6):915-926.
11. Li X., Logan G.D., Zbrodoff N.J. Where do we look when we count? The role of eye movements in enumeration. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2010, 72(2):409-426.
12. Atkinson J., Francis M.R., Campbell F.W. The dependence of the visual numerosity limit on orientation, colour, and grouping in the stimulus. Perception 1976, 5(3):335-342.
13. Van Oeffelen M.P.V., Peter G. Enumeration of dots: an eye movement analysis. Mem. Cognit. 1984, 12(6):607-612.
14. Pylyshyn Z.W., Storm R.W. Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spat. Vis. 1988, 3:179-197.
15. Intriligator J., Cavanagh P. The spatial resolution of visual attention. Cognit. Psychol. 2001, 43:171-216.
16. Cavanagh P. Attention-based motion perception. Science 1992, 257:1563-1565.
17. Watson D.G., Humphreys G.W. Visual marking of moving objects: a role for top-down feature-based inhibition in selection. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1998, 24(3):946-962.
18. Tipper S.P., Jordan H., Weaver B. Scene-based and object-centered inhibition of return: evidence for dual orienting mechanisms. Percept. Psychophys. 1999, 61:50-60.
19. Ogawa H., Takeda Y., Yagi A. Inhibitory tagging on randomly moving objects. Psychol. Sci. 2002, 13:125-129.
20. Pylyshyn Z.W. Some puzzling findings in multiple object tracking (MOT): II. Inhibition of moving nontargets. Vis. cogn. 2006, 14:175-198.
21. Magnussen S., Torjussen T. Sustained visual afterimages. Vision Res. 1974, 14(8):743-744.
22. Wallace B. Prolongation of a visual afterimage with systematic alternation of room illumination. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 1982, 19(6):351-352.
23. Kowler E., Steinman R.M. The role of small saccades in counting. Vision Res. 1977, 17(1):141-146.
24. Trick L.M., Audet D., Dales L. Age differences in enumerating things that move: implications for the development of multiple-object tracking. Mem. Cognit. 2003, 31(8):1229-1237.
25. Ginsburg N. Perceived numerosity, item arrangement, and expectancy. Am. J. Psychol. 1978, 91(2):267-273.
26. Afraz S.R., Kiani R., Vaziri-Pashkam M., Hossein Esteky H. Motion-induced overestimation of the number of items in a display. Perception 2004, 33:915-925.
27. Treue S. Visual attention: the where, what, how and why of saliency. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2003, 13(4):428-432.
28. Treisman A. Features and objects: the fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. Section A 1988, 40:201-237.
29. Rizzolatti G., Riggio L., Dascola I., Umiltá C. Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia 1987, 25:31-40.
30. Awh E., Armstrong K.M., Moore T. Visual and oculomotor selection: links, causes and implications for spatial attention. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2006, 10:124-130.
31. Moore T., Armstrong K.M. Selective gating of visual signals by microstimulation of frontal cortex. Nature 2003, 421:370-373.
32. Muller J.R., Philiastides M.G., Newsome W.T. Microstimulation of the superior colliculus focuses attention without moving the eyes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005, 102:524-529.
33. Cutzu F., Tsotsos J.K. The selective tuning model of attention: psychophysical evidence for a suppressive annulus around an attended item. Vision Res. 2003, 43(2):205-219.
34. Mounts J.R. Evidence for suppressive mechanisms in attentional selection: feature singletons produce inhibitory surrounds. Percept. Psychophys. 2000, 62:969-983.
35. He S., Cavanagh P., Intriligator J. Attentional resolution and the locus of awareness. Nature 1996, 383:334-338.
36. Cavanagh P. Attention routines and the architecture of selection. Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention 2004, 13-28. Guilford Press, New York. M. Posner (Ed.).
37. Toet A., Levi D.M. The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea. Vision Res. 1992, 32(7):1349-1357.
38. Bouma H. Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. Vision Res. 1973, 13:767-782.
39. Alvarez G.A., Franconeri S.L. How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism. J. Vis. 2007, 7(13):1-10.
40. Mandler G., Shebo B.J. Subitizing: an analysis of its component processes. J. Exp. Psychol. General 1982, 111:1-22.